Effect Of Magnetic Therapy In Bladder Dysfunction And Quality Of Life In Paraplegic Patients

March 4, 2024 updated by: Moataz Mohamed Talaat El Semary, Cairo University

Effect of Magnetic Therapy in Bladder Dysfunction and Quality of Life in Paraplegic Patients

Each study subject will undergo baseline urodynamic testing (UDS) at the beginning of the study to confirm the diagnosis of a neurogenic bladder with DSD and establish baseline bladder functions. The study will be divided into two phases: a Treatment phase (16 weeks) and a Follow-up phase (6 weeks). During the treatment phase, each subject will undergo once/week magnetic spinal cord stimulation (MSCS) at 1Hz (low) frequency (40-60% intensity) over the lumbar spine. Once each subject entered the treatment phase of the study and will receive weekly lumbar spinal cord magnetic stimulation for a total of 16 weeks. This 16-week period of MSCS constituted bladder rehabilitation. Each subject will receive non-video urodynamic testing once every four weeks during the treatment phase to monitor progress and ensure that bladder function will not further impaired. After the initial four-week stimulation period, each subject will be asked to attempt volitional urination for 5-10minutes prior to bladder catheterization. the subjects will instruct to keep the environment quiet, relax and focus on voiding

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Forty male Paraplegic patients will be recruited.…from outpatients' clinics and their ages from 20 to 35 years and the inclusion criteria for the study will be a stable American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AISA) A/B, motor complete spinal cord injury between spinal levels T6-T12 present for greater than 1 year, and a documented history of neurogenic bladder requiring intermittent catheterization. Each subject will require to have at least three prior urodynamic studies to confirm the diagnosis of neurogenic bladder with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD), which was diagnosed with urodynamic study in which a rise in detrusor pressure and concomitant needle EMG activity and rise in urethral pressure were demonstrated Patients with a history of autonomic dysreflexia were excluded from the study. Any patient who will be ventilator dependent, abusing drugs, have musculoskeletal dysfunction (i.e., unstable fractures), cardiopulmonary diseases, active infections or ongoing depression requiring treatment, or have previous exposure to and use of spinal cord stimulation will be excluded from the study. Patients with a history of bladder Botox injection or bladder/sphincter surgeries will be excluded

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

IInclusion Criteria:

  • Male Participants ages 20 to 35 years
  • Participants will be a stable American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AISA) A/B.
  • Motor incomplete spinal cord injury between spinal levels T6-T12.
  • Participants present for more than 1 year.
  • Each participant will require at least three prior urodynamic studies to confirm the diagnosis of neurogenic bladder with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD), which was diagnosed with urodynamic study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of autonomic dysreflexia.
  • Any patient who will be ventilator dependent, abusing drugs, have musculoskeletal dysfunction (i.e., unstable fractures).
  • Any patient who will have cardiopulmonary diseases, active infections or ongoing depression requiring treatment, or have previous exposure to and use of spinal cord stimulation.
  • Patients with a history of bladder Botox injection or bladder/sphincter surgeries.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Magnetic therapy group
receive magnetic therapy plus pelvic floor exercises.
Device: magnetic therapy
Kegel exercises
Other Names:
  • pelvic floor exercises
No Intervention: Pelvic floor exercises group
pelvic floor exercises only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bladder Volume at first desire to void in Milliliters.
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
one of bladder functions using urodynamic testing
Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
Detrusor pressure At Qmax in Centimeters of water
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
one of bladder functions using urodynamic testing
Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
Maximum flow rate in milliliters per second
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
one of bladder functions using urodynamic testing
Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
Amplitude per time in millivolts
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
EMG Measurement during contraction of pelvic floor muscles
Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
Upper centile amplitude in millivolts
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
EMG Measurement during contraction of pelvic floor muscles
Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
Qualiveen short version 8 questions from 1 to 4 (worse if high score)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)
Qualiveen questionnaire short form of quality of life
Baseline, pre-intervention then Peri procedurally after 8 weeks and finally "immediately after the intervention (16 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 21, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P.T.REC/012/004741

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings