Telerehabilitation Based Motor Imagery and Action Observation Training in Multiple Sclerosis
Effect of Telerehabilitation-Based Motor Imagery and Action Observation Training on Balance and Functional Mobility in Multiple Sclerosis: Randomized Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Busra CANDIRI
- Phone Number: +9005073780717
- Email: candiri_17@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: dilan demirtas karaoba
- Email: dilandemirtas92@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Battalgazi
-
Malatya, Battalgazi, Turkey (Türkiye), 44280
- Inonu University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being diagnosed with mulltiple sclerosis according to the McDonald criteria
- Expanded Disability Status Scale<5.5,
- Being between the ages of 18-65,
- Mini mental test score>24,
- Have a phone that can adapt to participating in a video call
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having another additional neurological disease that may cause balance and coordination disorders,
- having received physical therapy and regularly engaged in sports in the last 6 months
- Having an attack in the last 3 months
- Refusal to participate in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental group
Individuals will receive standard rehabilitation and telerehabilitation-based motor imagery and action observation therapy.
|
The program consists of a joint treatment in which lower extremity strengthening and balance exercises are carried out synchronously.
The program will include a total of 5 minutes of warm-up, 5 minutes of cool-down and 30 minutes of exercises related to the program.
The difficulty of the program will increase by changing the number of exercises and increasing the weight in strengthening exercises.
Progress in balance and coordination exercises will vary by changing the ground, increasing the standing time, and keeping the eyes open and closed.
In the experimental group, in addition to traditional telerehabilitation, action observation and motor imagery of 4 exercises will be performed in each session.
A video will be prepared for 4 exercises.
Then, the participant will perform 2 minutes of action observation of each movement, followed by 1 minute of motor imagery.
In addition to the traditional telerehabilitation program, a 12-minute combination of action observation and motor imagery will be performed in each session.
Exercises will be changed every two weeks, gradually increasing the difficulty.
|
|
Experimental: Control group
Individuals will receive standard rehabilitation.
|
The program consists of a joint treatment in which lower extremity strengthening and balance exercises are carried out synchronously.
The program will include a total of 5 minutes of warm-up, 5 minutes of cool-down and 30 minutes of exercises related to the program.
The difficulty of the program will increase by changing the number of exercises and increasing the weight in strengthening exercises.
Progress in balance and coordination exercises will vary by changing the ground, increasing the standing time, and keeping the eyes open and closed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Berg Balance Scale consists of a total of 14 items.
Evaluation for each stage is made between 0-4.
Higher score indicates better functional balance performance
|
Baseline
|
|
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline
|
Berg Balance Scale consists of a total of 14 items.
Evaluation for each stage is made between 0-4.
Higher score indicates better functional balance performance
|
6 weeks after baseline
|
|
Muscle strength and functional mobility
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The participant will be asked to sit and stand up from a standard chair between 42-45 cm, with hands crossed on the chest, without support, 5 times.
The time will be stopped when the participant completes the last sitting.
It will be recorded in seconds.
|
Baseline
|
|
Muscle strength and functional mobility
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline
|
The participant will be asked to sit and stand up from a standard chair between 42-45 cm, with hands crossed on the chest, without support, 5 times.
The time will be stopped when the participant completes the last sitting.
It will be recorded in seconds.
|
6 weeks after baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
This scale consists of a total of 9 items and is scored between 0-7.
>4 points indicate fatigue
|
Baseline
|
|
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline
|
This scale consists of a total of 9 items and is scored between 0-7.
>4 points indicate fatigue
|
6 weeks after baseline
|
|
Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQoL) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The scale consists of 31 questions in 9 dimensions (subscales).
The index score is calculated as the average of these subscale scores.
All 9 dimensions and the index score are linearly transformed and standardized on a scale from 0 to 100; where 0 indicates the worst possible level of quality of life and 100 indicates the best level.
|
Baseline
|
|
Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQoL) questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline
|
The scale consists of 31 questions in 9 dimensions (subscales).
The index score is calculated as the average of these subscale scores.
All 9 dimensions and the index score are linearly transformed and standardized on a scale from 0 to 100; where 0 indicates the worst possible level of quality of life and 100 indicates the best level.
|
6 weeks after baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Burcu talu, Inonu University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025/7369
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.