Dragon Ambient eXperience (DAX) Copilot Evaluation (DAX)
Dragon Ambient eXperience (DAX) Express Pilot Evaluation
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201
- Atrium Health Navicent
-
Rome, Georgia, United States, 30165
- Atrium Health Floyd
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
- Atrium Health
-
Laurinburg, North Carolina, United States, 28352
- Scotland Health Care System
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- clinicians specializing in family medicine, internal medicine, and general pediatrics (including physicians and advanced practice providers [APPs])
- (intervention group) showed interests in participating in Dragon Ambient eXperience (DAX) Copilot
- (control group) clinicians who opted out from Dragon Ambient eXperience (DAX) Copilot in vendor's baseline survey
- (control group) clinicians who worked in the same clinic/region as the intervention group
Exclusion Criteria:
- preceptors
- inactive DAX participants (i.e., had DAX license but never activate it)
- have the same first use and last use DAX date
- missing demographics
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Intervention - Dragon Ambient eXperience (DAX)
Clinicians interacted with DAX Copilot
|
The tool (DAX) listens to the conversation between a clinician and patient/caregiver during their visit, provides transcriptions between different speakers for the clinician to review, edit, and included in the final EHR notes.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: No Intervention - Control group
Clinicians with standard care
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total EHR time
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Total time on EHR (during and outside of clinic sessions) per 8 hour of patient scheduled time.
|
Month 10
|
|
Work outside of work
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Time on EHR outside of scheduled patient hours per 8 hour of patient scheduled time.
|
Month 10
|
|
Time on encounter note documentation
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Hours on documentation (note writing) per 8 hour of scheduled patient time
|
Month 10
|
|
Completed appointment rate
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Total completed visits over scheduled visits
|
Month 10
|
|
Same day closure rate
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Number of visits closed on the same day over total scheduled visits
|
Month 10
|
|
Note length
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Length of note in EPIC for each visit
|
Month 10
|
|
Gross revenue per visit
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Total charged amount in each day over total completed visits on the same day
|
Month 10
|
|
wRVU per visit
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Total work relative value units (wRVU) in each day over total completed visits on the same day
|
Month 10
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Provider satisfaction
Time Frame: Month 4
|
REDCap survey to clinicians in both groups (intervention and control) and assess their satisfaction of the new tool.
|
Month 4
|
|
Provider interview
Time Frame: Month 1
|
12 semi-structured interview on clinicians in the intervention group.
Each interview was facilitated using an interview guide with a semi-structured list of questions to help guide the conversation and answer the learning objectives.
|
Month 1
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Patient satisfaction on the visit - patient satisfaction surveys are collected as part of routine care, which will be accessed through Medallia.
Scores range between 0 (worst) to 10 (best) with one decimal point.
|
Month 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tsai-Ling Liu, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Principal Investigator: Timothy C Hetherington, MS, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Study Chair: Jeffrey A. Cleveland, MD, FAAP, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00098063
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.