Neurofilament Light Chain And Voice Acoustic Analyses In Dementia Diagnosis (NAVAIDD)

May 29, 2025 updated by: Amy Brodtmann, Monash University

A Blood Test for Dementia? A Cohort Study to Assess the Diagnostic Utility of Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain Protein in All-cause Dementia

This cohort study aims to determine if a blood test can aid with diagnosing dementia in anyone presenting with cognitive complaints to a single healthcare network. The investigators will measure levels of a brain protein, Neurofilament light chain (Nfl), and assess changes in language using speech tests.

Participants will have a single blood test and speech test, and will be followed up at 12-months to complete questionnaires and cognitive scales over the phone. The speech test will also be completed again at 12-months.

Individuals at risk of a Fronto-temporal dementia syndrome will be eligible to complete optional genetic testing involving an 'at home' saliva sample.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Problem: There is no "gold-standard test" to detect all forms of dementia. People can present with subtle changes that are missed on standard cognitive screening tests, which are not designed for people whose first language is not English or from diverse cultural and educational backgrounds. State-of-the art brain imaging is only available to Australians living in large urban centres, further entrenching health care inequities. The lack of validated diagnostic tests and pathways causes diagnostic delays, increases patient and caregiver stress. Therapies are on the horizon for many forms of dementia - not only Alzheimer's disease - meaning that the lack of identification of simple dementia diagnostic biomarkers represents a critical knowledge gap.

Mission: New technologies now allow us to test abnormal brain protein levels in a routine peripheral blood test, record a voice sample to analyse its acoustics and reveal brain disease, and perform "mail-out" genetic tests using a simple saliva sample. The levels of a brain derived blood protein, neurofilament light chain (NfL), will be estimated and natural language processing and acoustic analysis will be measured in all patients presenting with cognitive complaints to a single healthcare network servicing 1 million ethnically and culturally diverse Australians. Researchers will investigate the utility of early genetic testing for those at high risk of a genetic cause for their disease. They will use these data to develop diagnostic pathways, leveraging existing collaborations to develop future screening programs. Early to mid-career researchers will be supported to translate new technologies into clinical practice in the shortest practicable time-frame.

Significance: Accessible and cost effective tests will inform new pathways to dementia diagnosis. This will transform the dementia landscape, shortening time to diagnosis, increasing diagnostic certainty, and allowing more Australians access to appropriate care, education, and future therapies.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • Victoria
      • Box Hill, Victoria, Australia, 3128
      • Wantirna, Victoria, Australia, 3152
        • Recruiting
        • Wantirna Health
        • Contact:
          • Sarah Shue

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study cohort will include any individual of all ages, ethnicities, identities and genders. This is to ensure that the findings are generalisable to other national healthcare networks and to provide maximum information on the utility of using blood-biomarker estimation in real-world clinical settings

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients presenting to Eastern Health services with a cognitive complaint or potential neurodegenerative disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prognosis <12 months
  • No cognitive complaint
  • Patients not involved within the single healthcare network

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline NfL level
Time Frame: Day 0
Plasma Nfl (pg/ml), estimated using Quanterix SIMOA HD-X
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in speech processing
Time Frame: Day 0 and 12-months
Staff and/or self administered using Redenlab software and analysed by speech pathologist for acoustic measures of timing (e.g., pause length (seconds) in reading and monologue tasks), vocal control (e.g., fundamental frequency (hertz) and loudness variation (decibel) from vowel and monologue), and vocal quality (e.g., dysphonia measures derived from sustained vowel).
Day 0 and 12-months
Change in language processing
Time Frame: Day 0 and at 12-months
Recorded by a member of the research team using Redenlab software and assessed by a speech therapist using Natural Language Processing techniques.
Day 0 and at 12-months
Change in Direct Magnitude Estimation
Time Frame: Day 0 and at 12-months
Perceptual rating of speech using Redenlab software; measuring intelligibility (i.e ability to be understood) and naturalness (deviation from healthy norm) of speech. Assessed by a speech therapist on a scale from 0 to 100; 0 indicates none of the speech is intelligible/natural, 100 indicates all the speech is intelligible/natural.
Day 0 and at 12-months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: Day 0 and at 12-months
Functional screen; assessed by member of the research team based on clinical notes. Assessed as change from baseline. Scores ranging from 0-5, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Day 0 and at 12-months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment score
Time Frame: At 12-months
Cognitive screen; staff administered via telephone. Scores include overall MoCA score (0-22) and Memory Index Score (0-15), greater scores indicate greater cognition.
At 12-months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score
Time Frame: At 12-months
Mood screen; staff administered via telephone. Scores include a total depression score (0-21) and total anxiety score (0-21); grouped according to normal (0-7), Borderline abnormal (8-10) and Abnormal (11-21).
At 12-months
Clinical Global Impression score
Time Frame: At 12-months
Global rating of improvement/change; staff administered via telephone. Scored on a 7 point scale, scores closer to 0 indicative of greater improvement and scores closer to 7 representing much worse).
At 12-months
WHO Disability Assessment 12-item telephone interview score
Time Frame: At 12-months
Functional screen, staff administered via telephone. Scored as an overall percentage (%) disability, higher scores indicating less function.
At 12-months
WHO Disability Assessment 36-item self report score
Time Frame: At 12-months
Functional screen, self administered. Scored as an overall percentage (%) disability, higher scores indicating less function.
At 12-months
DNA sample for testing known pathogenic dementia mutations
Time Frame: Anytime before 12-months
Self-administered saliva sample; Testing using Invitae Fronto-temporal dementia and AD panel: C9orf72, CHCHD10, CHMP2B, DCTN1, FUS, GRN, HNRNPA2B1, MAPT, SQSTM1, TARDBP, TBK1, TREM2, UBQLN2, VCP
Anytime before 12-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Monash University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Melbourne
Wake Forest University
Invitae Corporation
Eastern Health
Deakin University
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Redenlab

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Prof. Amy Brodtmann, MBBS, FRACP, PhD, FANZAN, Monash University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • E21-006-72840

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurodegenerative Diseases

Clinical Trials on Venepuncture

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings