Evaluation of Clinical Impact of the Type of Cardioplegia Used in the Patient Undergoing Major Cardiac Surgery.

March 13, 2025 updated by: Lourdes Montero Cruces

Evaluation of Clinical Impact of the Type of Cardioplegia Used in the Patient Undergoing Major Cardiac Surgery with Extracorporeal Circulation. CARDIO-HEART Clinical Trial.

Phase IV clinical trial of a single-blind, prospective and longitudinal randomized intervention comparing patients undergoing major cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation who are administered Custodiol crystalloid cardioplegia versus Buckberg blood cardioplegia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Myocardial protection by administering cardioplegia is a fundamental concept during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It is a multifactorial strategy, in which cardioplegia is the most important. To date, there is no standardized consensus on the use of cardioplegia in different cardiac surgery procedures, and the best strategy continues to be debated given the wide range available. The choice of the type of cardioplegia should be made on an individual basis, taking into account the surgical procedure and clinical context. The need for a single dose of cardioplegia could favor the use of Custodiol crystaloid cardioplegia in complex cardiac surgeries that require longer extracorporeal circulation time. Both cardioplegia are safe and effective and widely used globally; however, the information provided in the literature is limited, with most of the information coming from retrospective studies.The objective of the present study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Custodiol crystalloid cardioplegia versus Buckberg blood cardioplegia in patients undergoing major cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation with prolonged aortic clamping times.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years of age.
  • Patients with cardiac pathology and indication for major cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation and aortic clamping.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy.
  2. Aortic arch procedures.
  3. Procedures in which hypothermia <28ºC is expected during the intervention.
  4. Minimally invasive procedures "Port Access".
  5. Active endocarditis.
  6. Emerging procedures.
  7. Isolated aortic valve replacements.
  8. Decision of the main surgeon not to participate in the study due to other clinical criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Buckberg
Patients who will be administered Buckberg blood cardioplegia.
Drug: Buckberg Cardi-Braun
Patients undergoing major cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation who are administered Buckberg blood cardioplegia.
Other Names:
  • Buckberg Cardi-Braun cardioplegia solution. ATC: B05X A16.
Experimental: Custodiol
Patients who will be administered Custodiol crystalloid cardioplegia.
Drug: Custodiol Htk Soln
Patients undergoing major cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation who are administered Custodiol crystalloid cardioplegia.
Other Names:
  • Custodiol HTK solution. ACT: K944866

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the composite event
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of the composite event of death, perioperative AMI, low cardiac postoperative output with need for ionotropics, and AKIN-III acute kidney failure
90 days after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in the incidence of elevation of Troponin
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of the elevation of Troponin I US at 12 and 24 hours after the procedure.
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the 90-day mortality rate
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of 90-day postoperative mortality
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the incidence of low cardiac postoperative output
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of low cardiac postoperative output event with need for ionotropic drugs in the first 24 hours.
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the incidence of acute kidney failure event
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of AKIN-III acute kidney failure event
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of perioperative AMI incidence
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the incidence of major bleeding event
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of major bleeding event or life-threatening or disabling hemorrhage.
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the incidence of the need of transfusion
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of the need for transfusion of blood products (absolute number) in the first 48 hours.
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of the need for prolonged mechanical ventilation for >24h.
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the incidence of neurological complications
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of type 1 and type 2 neurological complications.
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
90 days after the intervention
Differences in the overall survival rate at 90 days.
Time Frame: 90 days after the intervention
Comparison of overall survival at 90 days.
90 days after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lourdes Montero Cruces

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lourdes Montero Cruces, Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 24/238-EC_M

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings