Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Treatment of Insomnia with Subjective Cognitive Decline

November 26, 2024 updated by: Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Treatment of Insomnia with Subjective Cognitive Decline: a Randomized Controlled Trail

Insomnia is the most common form of sleep disorder, and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in patients with insomnia may be an ultra-early manifestation of AD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising tool for the treatment of insomnia by modulating neural excitability and inducing plasticity. However, there is a lack of studies on rTMS treatment of cognitive impairment associated with insomnia. The efficacy and safety of rTMS for cognitive impairment in insomnia patients with SCD will be assessed by a randomized controlled trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Aged 30-80 years old; (2) Diagnostic criteria for insomnia: DSM-V and ICSD-3; (3) Subjective cognitive decline. (4) Regular use of non-benzodiazepines for insomnia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Refuse participants; (2) Presence of cognitive dysfunction; (3) Combined with other diseases other than central nervous system non-neurodegenerative diseases; (4) Use drugs that may affect cognition, degree of awakening and sleep quality due to other diseases; (5) Contraindications to rTMS treatment: (6) Severe complications and immune diseases; (7) Inability to cooperate; (8) Pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: rTMS
Device: rTMS
Stimulation coil Cool-B65 A CO, located right lingual gyrus, stimulation frequency 1Hz, stimulation intensity 80% of motor threshold, number of stimuli 3 pulses/train, train interval 1s, 500 trains in total, 1500 total stimulation pulses, total stimulation time 20 min, treatment application once a day, continuous application for two weeks, 5 days a week.
Sham Comparator: sham rTMS
Device: Sham Comparator
Stimulation coil Cool-B65 P CO, located right lingual gyrus, stimulation frequency 1Hz, stimulation intensity 80% of motor threshold, number of stimuli 3 pulses/train, train interval 1s, 500 trains in total, 1500 total stimulation pulses, total stimulation time 20 min, treatment application once a day, continuous application for two weeks, 5 days a week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline SCD-Q9 to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
9-item Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q9)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline MMSE to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline MoCA scores to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline CDR to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline RAVLT to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline HAMA to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Human Anti-Murine Antibodies (HAMA)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline HAMD to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline NPI to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline CDS to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Coding Digit Symbol subtest (CDS)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline DDS to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Direct Digit Span subtest (DDS)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline inflammatory factors and neuropathological markers to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Aβ, tau, GFAP, α-Synuclein, NFL, VEGF, AQP4, RNA sequencing, pre.Caspase1, cl.Caspase1, pre.IL-1β, cl.IL-1β, IL-18, GSDMD, ASC, NLRP1, Iba-1, GFAP, NeuN, CD86, CD206, iNOS, Arg1, TLR4, TLR2, MyD88, NFκB, tau, p-NFκB, NLRP3, β-actin, ect.
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline PAF to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
The alpha-peak frequency (PAF) is the frequency with the highest power within the alpha-band.
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline structural imaging indicators to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
The intra-cellular compartment (Vic) of the Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) model represents diffusion within the axons and cells.And NODDI models the dispersion of axonal fibers with the use of an Orientation Dispersion Index (ODI).
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline adverse events to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Headache, tinnitus, pure tone hearing disorder, ect.
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline TMS-EEG to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • rTMS-insomnia

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings