Risk-adapted, Proteomic-guided Systemic Therapy for Previously Untreated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

August 21, 2026 updated by: University of California, Davis
This is a phase 2, pragmatic, 1:1 randomized, open-label study that evaluates risk-adapted, proteomic-guided systemic therapy to improve 12-month progression free survival (PFS) among patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomized to an intervention arm or a standard of care (SOC) arm. Participants in the intervention arm will undergo pretreatment assessment with PROphet Clinical Benefit (CB) and the Cancer and Aging Research Group Toxicity Tool (CARG-TT); data from the assessments will be used to select systemic therapy, which can be any SOC treatment that incorporates a Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) antibody with or without chemotherapy and/or with or without Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4) antibody. Participants in the SOC arm will undergo SOC biomarker assessment and subsequent selection of SOC systemic therapy. The primary endpoint is 12-month progression free survival (PFS). The findings will be stratified according to participant performance status and tumor PD-L1 score. The hypothesis is that risk-adapted, proteomic-guided systemic therapy will improve PFS among patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC compared to SOC systemic therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
56

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Chico, California, United States, 95926
        • Recruiting
        • Enloe Health Regional Cancer Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ranjan Pathak, MD
        • Contact:
      • Marysville, California, United States, 95901
        • Recruiting
        • Rideout Cancer Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hoa Nguyen, MD
        • Contact:
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Recruiting
        • University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Surbhi Singhal, MD
      • Truckee, California, United States, 96161
        • Recruiting
        • Tahoe Forest Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thomas Semrad, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer that is metastatic or unresectable (stage IIIC or IV), deemed appropriate to receive standard of care immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy given with palliative intent.
  • Age ≥18 years at the time of consent.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥50%).
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Stated ability and willingness to adhere to all protocol requirements while on study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tumor with known sensitizing alteration in ALK, EGFR, HER2, MET exon 14, NTRK, RET, or ROS1.
  • Medical comorbidities precluding immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy per treating investgator's discretion.
  • Previous systemic therapy for metastatic Stage IIIC or IV NSCLC. Patients who previously completed systemic therapy for early stage or locally advanced NSCLC ≥ 80 days prior to trial registration are eligible for inclusion.
  • Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the participant's safety or compliance while on study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Systemic immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy informed by PROphet CB and CARG-TT
Drug: Systemic (ICI)-based therapy informed by the PROphet CB assay and the CARG-TT assessment.
Pretreatment assessment with PROphet CB and CARG-TT, which will be used to determine which first-line systemic treatment participants in the intervention arm receive. Systemic treatment will be pre-determined by the trial, according to the results from PROphet CB and CARG-TT.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Standard of care (SOC) biomarker assessment and subsequent selection of SOC systemic therapy.
Drug: Standard of Care
Standard of care (SOC) biomarker testing followed by first-line treatment with either anti-PD(L)1 Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or anti-PD(L)1 ICI + chemotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary objective is to evaluate 12-month progression free survival (PFS) of systemic therapy informed by PROphet CB and CARG-TT (intervention arm) versus standard of care systemic therapy
Time Frame: Up to 12 months.
Progression free survival (PFS) at 12 months, defined as progression assessed per investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 or death due to any cause at 12 months (± 28 days) from start of treatment.
Up to 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate treatment-related adverse events of systemic therapy informed by PROphet CB and CARG-TT (intervention arm) versus standard of care systemic therapy.
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
  • Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events from chemotherapy classified and graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v5.0
  • Grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors classified and graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0
  • Number of dose delays, dose reductions, and/or dose discontinuations for treatment-related adverse event
  • Initiation and dose of systemic steroids for possible immune-related adverse event
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
To evaluate time to treatment discontinuation of systemic therapy informed by PROphet CB and CARG-TT (intervention arm) versus standard of care systemic therapy
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Time from the start of treatment to the date of treatment discontinuation or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first
Up to 12 months
To evaluate overall PFS of systemic therapy informed by PROphet CB and CARG-TT (intervention arm) versus standard of care systemic therapy.
Time Frame: Up to 60 months.
Overall progression free survival (PFS) defined as the time from the start of treatment to the first date of the progression (any progression assessed per investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Up to 60 months.
To evaluate overall survival (OS) among participants treated with systemic therapy informed by PROphet CB and CARG-TT (intervention arm) versus standard of care systemic therapy.
Time Frame: Up to 60 months.
Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from the start of treatment to death due to any cause or 60 months, whichever occurs first.
Up to 60 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, Davis

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Surbhi Singhal, MD, University of California, Davis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2036

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2036

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UCDCC323
  • NCI-2026-00133 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings