Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
A Two-year Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of a CAD/CAM Composite to a Polymer-infiltrated Ceramic Restorations
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Dakahliya
-
Al Mansurah, Dakahliya, Egypt, 35516
- Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The presence of two molars with compound proximal carious lesions or defective restorations involving two surfaces (occluso-mesial or occluso-distal cavities) corresponding to Black's Class II, with a severity score of 4 or 5 according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS)
- The buccolingual width of lesions should exceed two-thirds of the intercuspal distance.
- The teeth were required to be vital and free from any periapical radiolucency.
- The teeth were required to be in normal alignment, in contact with sound adjacent teeth, and have antagonist teeth present in normal occlusion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The presence of uncontrolled systemic disease, pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Patients with extremely poor oral hygiene, active periodontal disease, or those involving in orthodontic treatment or periodontal surgery.
- Patients with wear facets and parafunctional habits as clinching and bruxism.
- Hypersensitive, endodontically treated, non-vital or cracked teeth.
- Teeth with proximal cavities involving more than two surfaces, those that exhibited pulp exposure during caries excavation and required direct pulp capping, or those with missing cusps necessitating cusp capping.
- Teeth without proximal contact, missing neighbouring or opposing teeth
- Patients with known unavailability to attend recall visits, or with known allergy to any component of the study materials.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Resin nano-ceramic
Resin-matrix ceramic CAD/CAM blocks for indirect restorations.
Restorations were designed, milled, finished, and cemented on the assigned contralateral site according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Each patient received this material on one side of the mouth; side allocation was randomized.
|
Inlay cavity preparations were performed, and RMC restorations were designed, milled, finished, and cemented on the assigned contralateral site according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Each patient received one material on one side of the mouth and the other on the contralateral side.
Side allocation was randomized.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Polymer-infiltrated ceramics
Resin-matrix ceramic CAD/CAM blocks for indirect restorations.
Restorations were designed, milled, finished, and cemented on the assigned contralateral site according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Each patient received this material on one side of the mouth; side allocation was randomized.
|
Inlay cavity preparations were performed, and RMC restorations were designed, milled, finished, and cemented on the assigned contralateral site according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Each patient received one material on one side of the mouth and the other on the contralateral side.
Side allocation was randomized.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Esthetic, functional and biological properties for each CAD/CAM restorative material
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Esthetic, functional and biological properties were assessed using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria.
Each criterion was rated on a five-point scale, where a score of 1 indicated clinically excellent or very good performance, score 2 indicated clinically good, score 3 indicated a clinically satisfactory, score 4 indicated clinically unsatisfactory, and score 5 indicated clinically poor performance requiring repair or replacement.
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Radiographic examination
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Each material was examined radiographically and radiographs were assessed and rated following World Dental Federation (FDI) five-point scale, where a score of 1 indicated clinically excellent or very good performance, score 2 indicated clinically good, score 3 indicated a clinically satisfactory, score 4 indicated clinically unsatisfactory, and score 5 indicated clinically poor performance requiring repair or replacement.
|
2 years
|
|
Periodontal response and adjacent mucosa
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Periodontal responce and adjacent mucosa were assessed using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria.
Each criterion was rated on a five-point scale, where a score of 1 indicated clinically excellent or very good performance, score 2 indicated clinically good, score 3 indicated a clinically satisfactory, score 4 indicated clinically unsatisfactory, and score 5 indicated clinically poor performance requiring repair or replacement.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hanan Fathy, Assistant Lecturer, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt
- Study Director: Hamdi Hamama, Clinical Professor, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura Universtity, Egypt
- Study Director: Jukka P Matinlinna, Clinical Professor, School of Medical Science, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
- Study Chair: Salah H Mahmoud, Clinical Professor, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura Universtity, Egypt
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- J0022055023CD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Restoration Failure
-
NCT06603116CompletedDental Restoration Failure
-
NCT06273410CompletedDental Restoration Failure
-
NCT07375706CompletedDental Restoration Failure
-
NCT05380973Completed
-
NCT03859284UnknownDental Restoration Failure
-
NCT03608306Unknown
-
NCT02119195CompletedDental Restoration Failure
-
NCT05499494Not yet recruitingDental Restoration Failure
-
NCT06441032Enrolling by invitation