Clinical Performance of Various Bilayer Biomimetic Resin Composite Strategies
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Tanta
-
Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
- Restorative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Proper oral hygiene
- Availability for follow-up periods
Exclusion Criteria:
- Endodontically treated or non-vital teeth
- Parafunctional habits such as tooth clenching or grinding
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EverX Posterior composite
Short fiber-reinforced composite
|
All patients received four various bilayer biomimetic restorations in four groups (n = 40) as follows: Group I: short fiber reinforced composite (everX Posterior); ); Group II: long fiber reinforced composite (Ribbond Inc., USA); Group III: glass ionomer restorative materials (Riva SDI); and Group IV: flowable composite (G-aenial universal).
|
|
Experimental: Ribbond
Long fiber-reinforced composite
|
All patients received four various bilayer biomimetic restorations in four groups (n = 40) as follows: Group I: short fiber reinforced composite (everX Posterior); ); Group II: long fiber reinforced composite (Ribbond Inc., USA); Group III: glass ionomer restorative materials (Riva SDI); and Group IV: flowable composite (G-aenial universal).
|
|
Experimental: Riva SDI
glass ionomer restorative material
|
All patients received four various bilayer biomimetic restorations in four groups (n = 40) as follows: Group I: short fiber reinforced composite (everX Posterior); ); Group II: long fiber reinforced composite (Ribbond Inc., USA); Group III: glass ionomer restorative materials (Riva SDI); and Group IV: flowable composite (G-aenial universal).
|
|
Experimental: G-aenial universal Flo
flowable composite
|
All patients received four various bilayer biomimetic restorations in four groups (n = 40) as follows: Group I: short fiber reinforced composite (everX Posterior); ); Group II: long fiber reinforced composite (Ribbond Inc., USA); Group III: glass ionomer restorative materials (Riva SDI); and Group IV: flowable composite (G-aenial universal).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The primary outcomes are: surface luster, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, fracture, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity.
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Clinical assessment was carried out according to the World Dental Federation (FDI) by two calibrated evaluators at baseline and at 6, 9, 12, and 18 months.
All of the restorations were ranked according to how well they met the criteria: clinically excellent or very satisfactory, clinically satisfactory, clinically satisfactory, or clinically inadequate.
Clinical success was defined as a score of 1, 2, or 3, and failure was indicated by scores of 4 or 5.
A powerful light source was used to conduct the visual inspection of the parameters.
A magnifying dental loupe was utilized for this purpose.
The Friedman test was conducted to evaluate intragroup comparisons of the same restoration outcomes through different follow-up periods.
The Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to assess intergroup comparisons between different restorations during the same follow-up period.
|
18 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tanner J, Tolvanen M, Garoushi S, Sailynoja E. Clinical Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth - Results of 2.5 Year Follow-up. Open Dent J. 2018 Jun 29;12:476-485. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010476. eCollection 2018.
- ElAziz RH, Mohammed MM, Gomaa HA. Clinical Performance of Short-fiber-reinforced Resin Composite Restorations vs Resin Composite Onlay Restorations in Complex Cavities of Molars (Randomized Clinical Trial). J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):296-303.
- Metwaly AA, Elzoghby AF, Abd ElAziz RH. Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial). BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8.
- Mohamed MH, Abouauf EA, Mosallam RS. Clinical performance of class II MOD fiber reinforced resin composite restorations: an 18-month randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05521-5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- biomimetic resin composite
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Composites Resins
-
NCT06299150Completed
-
NCT06884813Recruiting
-
NCT06884787Recruiting
-
NCT03936855CompletedComposite Resins
-
NCT05644860Active, not recruitingNanotechnology, Dental Materials, Composites
-
NCT02043873CompletedReplacement | Repair | Composites Restorations
-
NCT04600297RecruitingDental Prosthesis | Composite Resins
-
NCT07415317CompletedComposite Resins | Posterior Teeth
-
NCT02744703CompletedComposite Resins | Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors
Clinical Trials on short fiber reinforced composite , long fiber reinforced composite, light cure glass, flowable composite
-
NCT07535086Active, not recruiting
-
NCT01314729UnknownHealth of Periodontium
-
NCT04720638RecruitingCaries Class II | Decay, Dental
-
NCT06803537Active, not recruitingOcclusal Caries | Proximal Caries
-
NCT03283280CompletedDental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
-
NCT03515265CompletedDental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
-
NCT03264105UnknownRetention Rate of Flowable Composite in Demenerlized Pits and Fissure
-
NCT03242291UnknownMarginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber Reinforced Flowable Composite
-
NCT04019145Completed
-
NCT05902975Active, not recruiting