Evaluating Coronally Advanced Flap With Platelet-rich Fibrin Membrane and Chorion Membrane for Gingival Recession
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane and Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Human Gingival Recession
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Uttar Pradesh
-
Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Department of Periodontics and implantology , Institute of Dental sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18-35 years
- In good general health
- Isolated Miller's Class I or II gingival recession ≥ 2 mm
- ≥ 1 mm keratinised tissue apical to root exposure
- Identifiable CEJ (cementoenamel junction)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor oral hygiene after Phase I therapy
- Smoking or alcohol use
- Occlusal disharmony
- Parafunctional habits
- Non-vital or endodontically treated teeth
- Caries, restorations, or crowns at the CEJ
- Frenum pull at the attached gingiva
- Previous surgery in the area
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental site A: patient were treated with coronally advanced flap and PRF
Twenty five sites in each of 25 patient were treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane;
|
Description: After achieving adequate anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine (1:80,000 adrenaline), an intrasulcular incision was made on the buccal aspect of the involved teeth.
Two horizontal incisions were placed from the mesial and distal angles to the papillae at the CEJ, without involving adjacent gingival margins.
From their ends, two bevelled, slightly divergent oblique incisions were extended beyond the mucogingival junction, creating a trapezoidal flap.
A full-thickness flap was raised up to the MGJ, followed by split-thickness dissection apically, with periosteal release to allow passive coronal mobilization.
Adequate mobilization was defined as the flap margin reaching passively coronal to the CEJ.
The coronal papilla soft tissue was de-epithelialized to prepare connective tissue beds for suturing of the coronally advanced flap.
At the recipient site, the prepared PRF membrane was placed over the denuded root surfaces.
|
|
Experimental: Experimental site B: patient were treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) and CM
Twenty five sites in each of other 25 patient were treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) and chorion membrane (CM)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recession depth (RD)
Time Frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
|
Measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical extension of the gingival margin
|
Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
|
|
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
|
Measured between mesial and distal papillae across the buccal surface at the CEJ level
|
Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
|
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits:
|
Measured from the CEJ to the bottom of the gingival sulcus;
|
Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits:
|
|
Width of keratinized gingiva (WKG)
Time Frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
|
Measured from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ)
|
Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
|
|
Assessment of gingival biotype
Time Frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
|
Evaluated based on the transparency of the probe through the gingival margin while probing the sulcus at the midfacial aspect of teeth
|
Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Shatyajit Naik, MDS, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chambrone L, Chambrone D, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects? J Dent. 2008 Sep;36(9):659-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
- Bertl K, Spineli LM, Mohandis K, Stavropoulos A. Root coverage stability: A systematic overview of controlled clinical trials with at least 5 years of follow-up. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Oct;7(5):692-710. doi: 10.1002/cre2.395. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IDS/ETHCC/14/08
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.