The Effectiveness of Dialectical Behavioral Group Psychotherapy Compared to Supportive Individual Psychotherapy In Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Study on Therapeutic Alliance, Depression, Cognitive Function, Impulsivity, Suicide Risk, BDNF Levels, NFkB Levels, SOD Levels (DBT BPD)

March 4, 2026 updated by: Natalia Dewi Wardani, MD
In the context of therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder, our department had conduct a study titled "The Effectiveness of Dialectical Behavioral Group Psychotherapy Compared to Supportive Individual Psychotherapy in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Study of Therapeutic Alliance, Depression, Cognitive Function, Impulsivity, Suicide Risk, BDNF Levels, NFkB Levels, SOD Levels."

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder provided weekly for 13 weeks. Patients have given a logbooks. Researchers monitored patients weekly by telephone and monitor them during outpatient visits in the second, fourth, sixth, eighth, and twelfth weeks. Blood samples were taken before and 13 weeks after treatment. During the study, patients were advised not to consume any medications or herbal remedies outside of those prescribed by the doctor and recorded in the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Indonesia
    • Central Java
      • Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50275
        • Medical Faculty Diponegoro University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-60 years old
  • Diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V Axis II Disorders (SCID-II)
  • Junior high school education or higher
  • Patients willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking immunosuppressive drugs since one week before the study.
  • Based on interviews or medical records, there is no history of post-stroke, epilepsy, or diabetes mellitus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: DBT group psychotherapy
13 weeks, one session per week. Each week, 2-hour dialectical therapy group session for 5 patients per group.
Behavioral: DBT group psychotherapy
13 weeks, one session per week. Each week, one 2-hour dialectical therapy group session for 5 patients in a group.
Active Comparator: Suportive psychotherapy
13 weeks, one session per week. Each week, one 30-minute session of individual supportive psychotherapy.
Behavioral: Supportive Psychotherapy
13 weeks, one session per week. Each week, one 30-minute session of individual supportive psychotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
impulsivity with Barrat Impulsiveness Scale (BIS11)
Time Frame: 13 weeks
Barrat Impulsiveness Scale (BIS11) score, interval, Higher scores indicate greater impulsivity, with 30-51 indicating low, 52-71 average, and 72+ high impulsivity.
13 weeks
Suicide Risk with Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS)
Time Frame: 13 weeks
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) score, interval, Any "Yes" answer to behavior or ideation requires further clinical assessment.
13 weeks
Therapeutic Alliances with California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS)
Time Frame: 13 weeks
California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS) score. A higher CALPAS (California Psychotherapy Alliance Scale) score indicates a stronger, more positive therapeutic alliance between a patient and their therapist. The California Psychotherapy Alliance Scale (CALPAS) uses a 7-point Likert scale for its 24 items, ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 7 ("very much so"). Minimum score 24 and maximum score 168.
13 weeks
Depression with GRID Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID HAM-D)
Time Frame: 13 weeks

GRID Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID HAM-D) score, interval, higher total scores indicating greater severity of depression.

Minimum Score: 0 (No depression) Maximum Score: 52 (Severe depression)
13 weeks
cognitive function with Montreal Cognitive Assesment versi Indonesia (MoCA-Ina)
Time Frame: 13 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assesment Indonesian version (MoCA-Ina) score, interval. A 30-point screening tool validated to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Indonesia, with a score of 26 or higher considered normal.
13 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NFkB Levels in ng/ml
Time Frame: 13 weeks
ratio scale, nanogram/mililiter
13 weeks
BDNF level in pg/ml
Time Frame: 13 weeks
BDNF level in picogram/mililiter, ratio scale
13 weeks
SOD levels in ng/ml
Time Frame: 13 weeks
ratio scale, nanogram/mililiter
13 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Natalia Dewi Wardani, MD

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Faculty of Medicine University of Diponegoro, Indonesia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: M.I. Widiastuti MIW Widiastuti, Prof. dr.PAK(K), Sp.S(K), M.Sc, Medical Faculty Diponegoro University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 5, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 976/EC/KEPK-RSDK/2021
  • 247/UN7.5.4/HK/2022 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Medical Faculty Diponegoro University Grant 2022)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. The dataset involves sensitive information from minors regarding mental health, and sharing it publicly would compromise participant confidentiality as per the ethical approval obtained.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings