Evaluating the Efficacy of Pulsating Electromagnetic Field Therapy by CRAD ULCER X-01 for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Evaluating the Efficacy of Pulsating Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using the CRAD ULCER X-01 Device: A Randomised Parallel-Group Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Khairul Anwar Zarkasi, MBBS, MMedSc., PhD
- Phone Number: +60178870689
- Email: khairul.anwar@upnm.edu.my
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Muhammad Jasfizal Jasni, MD, MS
- Phone Number: +60132587459
- Email: jasfizal@upnm.edu.my
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 57000
- Recruiting
- Tuanku Mizan Armed Forces Hospital
-
Contact:
- Muhammad Azwan Ibrahim Dr
- Phone Number: +601132970402
- Email: azwan.ibrahim6189@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provision of written consent by subjects.
- Subject of either sex.
- At least 18 years of age.
- Known diabetes mellitus.
- Diagnosed with chronic DFU Grade I-III and Stage A according to the University of Texas Classification as recommended in the Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Foot (2nd Edition).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability or unwillingness to provide written consent.
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol as determined by the investigator.
- Other medical conditions which, in the investigator's judgement, may be associated with increased risk to the subject or may interfere with study assessments or outcomes.
- Participation in another clinical trial and/or recipient of investigational therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening visit.
- Patients who have metal implants in any part of the body.
- Patients with a pacemaker.
- History of malignancies.
- Presence of chronic kidney disease co-morbidity.
- Presence of severe peripheral artery disease, assessed when the ankle-brachial index (ABI) is <0.40.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
Wound dressing only without PEMF
|
|
|
Experimental: Treatment 1
PEMF 1 hour & wound dressing
|
The intervention in this study is PEMF therapy using CRAD ULCER X-01, which will be given to chronic DFU patients alongside wound dressing.
The device projects high-voltage, high-frequency, and low-current electrical stimulation to the DFU wounds.
The device operates in a stationary state at the lower end of the hospital bed of patients who are being treated.
This is because it depends solely on the wall socket power source (100/220/240V-AC, 50/60 HZ input Supply).
The position of the machine would be adjusted and locked using the adapted roller stand in the proximity of the patient's foot.
The elevation of the device would then be adjusted through the adapted mechanical arm, allowing the air channel to face the patient's foot while having a gap of 10-15 cm in between the patient's wound and the air beam (non-contact).
|
|
Experimental: Treatment 2
PEMF 2 hours & wound dressing
|
The intervention in this study is PEMF therapy using CRAD ULCER X-01, which will be given to chronic DFU patients alongside wound dressing.
The device projects high-voltage, high-frequency, and low-current electrical stimulation to the DFU wounds.
The device operates in a stationary state at the lower end of the hospital bed of patients who are being treated.
This is because it depends solely on the wall socket power source (100/220/240V-AC, 50/60 HZ input Supply).
The position of the machine would be adjusted and locked using the adapted roller stand in the proximity of the patient's foot.
The elevation of the device would then be adjusted through the adapted mechanical arm, allowing the air channel to face the patient's foot while having a gap of 10-15 cm in between the patient's wound and the air beam (non-contact).
|
|
Experimental: Treatment 3
PEMF 3 hours & wound dressing
|
The intervention in this study is PEMF therapy using CRAD ULCER X-01, which will be given to chronic DFU patients alongside wound dressing.
The device projects high-voltage, high-frequency, and low-current electrical stimulation to the DFU wounds.
The device operates in a stationary state at the lower end of the hospital bed of patients who are being treated.
This is because it depends solely on the wall socket power source (100/220/240V-AC, 50/60 HZ input Supply).
The position of the machine would be adjusted and locked using the adapted roller stand in the proximity of the patient's foot.
The elevation of the device would then be adjusted through the adapted mechanical arm, allowing the air channel to face the patient's foot while having a gap of 10-15 cm in between the patient's wound and the air beam (non-contact).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of wound healing
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Changes in wound size over the study duration
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tissue histology
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Appearance of wound tissue under haematoxylin and eosin staining.
|
3 months
|
|
Tissue immunohistology
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) in the wound tissue.
|
3 months
|
|
Oxidative stress marker
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Levels of superoxide dismutase or other oxidative stress biomarkers in the serum
|
3 months
|
|
Inflammatory marker
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) or other inflammatory biomarkers in the serum
|
3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Glycated haemoglobin
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Levels of HbA1c in the blood
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ministry of Health Malaysia (2018). Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Diabetic Foot, 2nd Edition. Putrajaya, Malaysia.
- Sidhu AS, Harbuzova V. Emerging technologies for the management of diabetic foot ulceration: a review. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2024 Nov 12;5:1440209. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1440209. eCollection 2024.
- Keyan Z, Liqian Z, Xinzhong X, Juehua J, Chungui X. Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Improved Peripheral Nerve Regeneration After Delayed Repair of One Month. Bioelectromagnetics. 2023 Oct-Dec;44(7-8):133-143. doi: 10.1002/bem.22443. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
- Avendano-Coy J, Lopez-Munoz P, Serrano-Munoz D, Comino-Suarez N, Avendano-Lopez C, Martin-Espinosa N. Electrical microcurrent stimulation therapy for wound healing: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Tissue Viability. 2022 May;31(2):268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
- Tentolouris, A., Eleftheriadou, I., Samakidou, G., & Tentolouris, N. (2025). Developments in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (Review). World Academy of Sciences Journal, 7, 46.
- Rabbani M, Rahman E, Powner MB, Triantis IF. Making Sense of Electrical Stimulation: A Meta-analysis for Wound Healing. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Feb;52(2):153-177. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03371-2. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
- Cheah YJ, Buyong MR, Mohd Yunus MH. Wound Healing with Electrical Stimulation Technologies: A Review. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Nov 1;13(21):3790. doi: 10.3390/polym13213790.
- Haesler, E. (2024). Electrical stimulation therapy for wound healing: a WHAM evidence summary. Wound Practice and Research, 32(3), 163-168.
- Abd El Rasheed, N. A. (2017). Pulsed electromagnetic fields versus laser therapy on enhancing recovery of diabetic foot ulcer: A single blind randomized controlled trial. Biomedical Research, 28(19), 8509-8514.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Metabolic Diseases
- Glucose Metabolism Disorders
- Diabetic Angiopathies
- Diabetes Complications
- Skin Diseases
- Skin Ulcer
- Leg Ulcer
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Foot Ulcer
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
- Inflammation
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Diabetic Foot
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 31/2025
- PKAT/JKEP/76-44 (Other Identifier: Armed Forces Health Services, Malaysian Armed Forces)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.