The Effects of Smell on Mood and Physical Responses

Psychoneuroimmunology and Mind-Body Medicine: Olfaction, Mood, and Physiological Responses

The purpose of this study is to examine the body's response to relaxing and stimulating fragrances commonly used in aromatherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Despite aromatherapy's popularity, efficacy data are scant, and potential mechanisms are controversial. This randomized controlled trial examined the psychological, autonomic, endocrine, and immune consequences of one purported relaxant odor (lavender), one stimulant odor (lemon), and a no-odor control (water), before and after a stressor (cold pressor); 56 healthy men and women were exposed to each of the odors during three separate visits. To assess the effects of expectancies, participants randomized to the "blind" condition were given no information about the odors they would smell; "primed" individuals were told what odors they would smell during the session, and what changes to expect. Experimenters were blind.

In each case we measured several different aspects of the cellular immune response, as well as skin barrier repair following tape stripping. This design allowed us to examine the ability of the odors to modulate endocrine and immune function, and health-relevant cutaneous responses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University Institute for Biobehavioral Medicine Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 44 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults with a normal sense of smell

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with medication that has immunological or endocrinological consequences
  • Chronic health problems that affect immune or endocrine systems
  • Allergy to perfume or cosmetics
  • Problems with sense of smell
  • Respiratory problems
  • Smoker
  • Current active asthma
  • Use of psychoactive drugs or mood-altering medication
  • History of anxiety disorder, major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorders
  • History of chest pain or ventricular fibrillation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Water
A yellow-tinted cotton ball containing 100 ml of the essential oil or distilled water was taped between the nose and upper lip on top of a piece of surgical tape; use of the barrier tape avoided percutaneous absorption . This method provided continuous and uniform exposure across subjects that would not have been possible with ambient room inhalation, and helped maintain experimenter blindness.
Other Names:
  • Citrus: lemon.
Experimental: Lavender
A yellow-tinted cotton ball containing 100 ml of the essential oil or distilled water was taped between the nose and upper lip on top of a piece of surgical tape; use of the barrier tape avoided percutaneous absorption . This method provided continuous and uniform exposure across subjects that would not have been possible with ambient room inhalation, and helped maintain experimenter blindness.
Other Names:
  • Citrus: lemon.
Experimental: Citrus
A yellow-tinted cotton ball containing 100 ml of the essential oil or distilled water was taped between the nose and upper lip on top of a piece of surgical tape; use of the barrier tape avoided percutaneous absorption . This method provided continuous and uniform exposure across subjects that would not have been possible with ambient room inhalation, and helped maintain experimenter blindness.
Other Names:
  • Citrus: lemon.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cortisol and Catecholamine Production
Time Frame: 3 Visits with at least 2 weeks between each. Average time to complete all visits was 64.46 days (SD 48.4). Cortisol: 9:05, 10:05, 10:55, 11:45, 12:15, 13:00. Nor/Epi: 9:05, 10:05, 10:55, 11:05, 11:45, 12:15
Cortisol, norepinephrine, epinephrine measured before and after physical (cold pressor) stressor, which occurred at 11:00.
3 Visits with at least 2 weeks between each. Average time to complete all visits was 64.46 days (SD 48.4). Cortisol: 9:05, 10:05, 10:55, 11:45, 12:15, 13:00. Nor/Epi: 9:05, 10:05, 10:55, 11:05, 11:45, 12:15
Immune Function
Time Frame: 3 Visits with at least 2 weeks between each. Average time to complete all visits was 64.46 days (SD 48.4). 9:05, 10:05, 11:45
Stimulated Cytokine Production (Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Interleukin-10 (IL-10)) measured before and after cold pressor stressor, which occurred at 11:00.
3 Visits with at least 2 weeks between each. Average time to complete all visits was 64.46 days (SD 48.4). 9:05, 10:05, 11:45
Skin Barrier Repair
Time Frame: 3 Visits with at least 2 weeks between each. Average time to complete all visits was 64.46 days (SD 48.4).10:05, 11:45, 13:15
TEWL (Transepidermal Water Loss, via tape stripping procedure)measured before and after cold pressor stressor (11:00). After obtaining baseline measurements on volar forearm, cellophane tape(3M Scotch-type; St. Paul, MN) was applied repeatedly (6-50 times) to remove superficial layer of cornified skin cells. Tape stripping stopped when TEWL was elevated from the basal level of 5-7 g/h/m2 to at least 20 g/h/m2. The number of strips required to reach TEWL X20 g/m2/h was the measure of barrier. TEWL was measured with a computerized evaporimetry instrument, the DermaLabs (CyberDERM, Media, PA).
3 Visits with at least 2 weeks between each. Average time to complete all visits was 64.46 days (SD 48.4).10:05, 11:45, 13:15
Immune Function: Delayed Hypersensitivity to Candida(DTH)
Time Frame: Day 1 11:45, Day 2 (24h) 11:45, Day 3 (48h) 11:45, Day 4 (72h) 11:45.
DTH memory responses to a common infectious agent provided a measure of T-cell immunity. Nurses inoculated subject's arm with 0.1ml Candida (stock solution diluted 1:20 in saline, Greer Labs, NC) intradermally, after the cold pressor stressor. The wheal diameter (2 dimensions) was self-assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours by participants given detailed instructions and templates for measurement.
Day 1 11:45, Day 2 (24h) 11:45, Day 3 (48h) 11:45, Day 4 (72h) 11:45.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, PhD, Ohio State University Institute for Biobehavioral Medicine Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2004

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2004

First Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2004

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2010

Last Verified

February 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R21AT002122-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Exposure to relaxant and stimulant odors

3
Subscribe