Divalproex Sodium vs. Placebo in Childhood/Adolescent Autism

October 16, 2024 updated by: Montefiore Medical Center
The study is designed to assess the efficacy of treatment with divalproex sodium (DS) vs. placebo in childhood/adolescent autism fulfilling DSM-IV and Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI) criteria. Currently, there are no FDA-approved treatments for this disorder, although behavioral and educational therapies and a variety of medications may play a role in the management of some autistic symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study compares divalproex sodium and placebo in the treatment of autistic disorder. Twenty six child or adolescent outpatients, with age ranges from 5-17, will be randomized into a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel treatment study. During the 12 weeks, patients will be monitored by the treating psychiatrist and assessed by an independent evaluator (IE). The IE will perform study assessments while remaining blind to medication regimens (including possible tapering) as well as any side effects. Study assessments will be administered at designated time points

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Meets DSM-IV, ADI, and ADOS criteria for autistic disorder

Age 5-17.

Outpatients

Parent/legal guardian signing informed consent, and assent documented for patient with demonstrated capacity to provide it.

Sexually active females of childbearing potential must use an acceptable method of birth control (oral contraceptive medications [the administration of which must be supervised by a parent or guardian], IUD, depot medication or tubal ligation) and have a negative serum pregnancy test prior to entry into the study.

Subject scores at least "4" (moderately ill) on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale for Autistic Disorder (CGI-AD).

Subject meets the following criteria at pre-study diagnostic assessment and baseline assessment: OAS-M 13 or ABC-Irritability Subscale 18 (raw scores).

Subjects with history of seizures, who have been seizure-free for 6 months on a stable dose of anticonvulsant medication other than divalproex sodium or related formulations (e.g., depakene). Non-medicated subjects with a history of seizures who have been seizure-free for 6 months. Subjects with abnormal EEG but no clinical seizures.

State exclusion criteria for enrollment in study:

Subjects who are pregnant or nursing mothers. Sexually active women of childbearing potential who are not using adequate birth control measures (detailed above in inclusion criteria).

Subjects with overall adaptive behavior scores below the age of two years on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Rating Scale.

Subjects with active or unstable epilepsy.

Subjects with any of the following past or present mental disorders: schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or organic mental disorders.

Subjects who are a serious suicidal risk.

Subjects with clinically significant or unstable medical illness that would contraindicate participation in the study, including hematopoietic or cardiovascular disease, pancreatitis, liver toxicity, and polycystic ovary syndrome.

Subjects reporting history of encephalitis, phenylketonuria, tuberous sclerosis, fragile X syndrome, anoxia during birth, pica, neurofibromatosis, hypomelanosis of Ito, hypothyroidism, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and maternal rubella.

Patients with history of the following:

gastrointestinal, liver, or kidney, or other known conditions which will presently interfere presently with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs; cerebrovascular disease or brain trauma; clinically significant unstable endocrine disorder, such as hypo- or hyperthyroidism; recent history or presence of any form of malignancy

Treatment within the previous 30 days with any drug known to a well-defined potential for toxicity to a major organ

Subjects with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory tests or physical exam.

Subjects likely to require ECT or any other psychotropic medication during the study, unless otherwise permitted.

Subjects unable to tolerate taper from psychoactive medication if necessary.

Subjects with a history of hypersensitivity or severe side effects associated with the use of divalproex sodium, or other an ineffective prior therapeutic trial of divalproex sodium (serum levels within range of 50-100 ug/ml for 6 weeks).

Subjects who have received any of the following interventions within the prescribed period before starting treatment:

investigational drugs within the previous 30 days; depot neuroleptic medication; psychotropic drugs not permitted for concurrent use in the study within the previous seven days; fluoxetine within the previous five weeks.

Subjects who have begun any new alternative non-medication treatments, such as diet, vitamins, and psychosocial therapy, within the previous three months.

Subjects with any organic or systemic disease or patients who require a therapeutic intervention, not otherwise specified, which would confound the evaluation of the safety of the study medication.

Subjects who reside in a remote geographical area who do not have regular access to transportation to the clinical facility.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects in this arm will receive a placebo comparative to the study drug divalproex sodium.
Placebo comparator.
Experimental: Divalproex Sodium
Subjects will receive the study drug, divalproex sodium.
Study drug.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Reporting Improvement on the Clinical Global Impression
Time Frame: Baseline to end of study (week 15)
The CGI-I is a 7-point improvement scale. Ratings of 1 or 2 (responders) indicate a substantial reduction in symptoms. A rating of 3 (minimally improved) on the CGI is defined as a slight symptomatic improvement that is not deemed clinically significant; patients with such an improvement were not considered responders. Two versions of this test were used, one focused on irritability (primary outcome measure) and a general version CGI-I-autism focused on all symptoms including core symptom domains. The CGI-I irritability took into consideration the scores from the ABC-Irritability subscale, the OAS-M aggression and irritability subscales and information from open-ended questioning related to the degree of interference, nature, and range of behavioral problems at school and at home
Baseline to end of study (week 15)
Change in Aberrant Behaviors as Measured by the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and End of Study (week 15)
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist is designed to objectively identify five behavior sub scales through observation by the primary caregiver: irritability, lethargy, stereotypy, hyperactivity, and inappropriate speech. The ABC was filled out by parents on a scale from 0-3 for each category. (0 being not a problem, 3 being severe problem). Scores from all sub scales were added (scoring 0-45 for Irritability subscale, 0-48 for Lethargy subscale, 0-21 for stereotypy scale, 0-48 for hyperactivity sub-scale, and 0-12 for inappropriate speech sub-scale) to obtain an overall score with a an overall scoring range of 0-174. Higher scores were indicative of worsening symptoms.
Baseline and End of Study (week 15)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Hollander, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimated)

September 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe