Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) - An Online Intervention Following TBI (TOPS)

An Online Intervention for Families Following Adolescent TBI - Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS)

The purpose of this study is to learn if using the World Wide Web to train teens and their families in problem-solving, communication skills, and stress management strategies can help them to cope better following traumatic brain injury (TBI). To answer this question, we will look at changes from before the intervention to after the intervention on questionnaire measures of problem-solving skills, communication, social competence, adjustment, and family stress and burden. We hypothesize that families receiving the TOPS intervention will have better parent-child communication and problem-solving skills at follow-up than those receiving the IRC intervention. Additionally, families receiving the TOPS intervention will have lower levels of parental distress, fewer child behavior problems and better child functioning than those receiving the IRC intervention. Lastly, treatment effects will be moderated by SES and life stresses, such that families with greater social disadvantage will benefit more from the TOPS intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) creates significant stress for families resulting in increased burden, anxiety and depression among family members. Both pre- and post-injury family functioning have been linked to child outcomes, suggesting that improvements in family adaptation may result in fewer social and behavioral sequelae in the injured child. Despite this evidence, the development and evaluation of family interventions following TBI are extremely rare.

Children with TBI are often treated at urban trauma centers then discharged to distant home communities where psychosocial follow-up is limited and/or difficult to access. Increasingly, the World Wide Web is being used to meet the mental and other health needs of individuals who have difficulty accessing care through traditional routes. Given the lack of specialized care and follow-up for TBI in many communities, the Web may provide an invaluable tool for linking families with state-of-the-art psychosocial care by reducing potential physical and psychological barriers (e.g., distance, stigma).

Building on previous intervention research of the PI, this study targets the adolescent population between the ages of 12-18. By identifying the unique concerns and issues of this population following brain injury, Teen Online Problem Solving seeks to improve family and teen adaptation, thereby reducing social and behavioral sequelae.

Comparison(s): Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) intervention with online curriculum and sequential videoconference therapy sessions in addition to usual care, compared to Internet Resource Comparison with online access to resources in addition to usual care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • between 11 and 18 years of age
  • moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
  • overnight hospital stay
  • injury occurred within the last 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • younger than 11 and older than 18 years of age
  • injury occurred more than 12 months ago
  • teen does not live with parents or guardian
  • English not spoken in the home
  • injury is a result of child abuse as documented by medical record
  • child or parent has history of hospitalization for a psychiatric problem
  • documentation that the injury is a result of child abuse
  • child suffered a non-blunt injury (e.g. projectile wounds, stroke, drowning, or other form of asphyxiation)
  • child ever diagnosed with moderate or severe mental retardation, Autism, or a significant developmental disability (child must be able to talk)
  • plans for the child to leave home during the coming 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Teen Online Problem Solving
The TOPS program has 10 sessions that provide training in stress management, problem solving, communication, and social skills to all enrolled families, while the remaining 6 sessions address content related to the stressors and burdens of individual families. Each self-guided online session includes real adolescents talking about how TBI affected them, content regarding the skill, video clips showing adolescents and/or families modeling the skill, and exercises giving the family an opportunity to practice the skill. After the completion of the self-guided web pages, the family will meet with the therapist via videoconference; the therapist will review the exercises and help the family implement the problem-solving process with a problem or goal identified by the family.
We will test the following hypotheses: 1) Children with TBI receiving TOPS will have fewer behavior problems, greater social competence, and better functioning than those receiving IRC at both post-treatment and at a 6-month follow-up assessment. 2) Caregivers of children receiving TOPS will report less depression and psychological distress, less parent-child conflict, and better family functioning than those receiving IRC at both post-treatment and at a 6-month follow-up assessment. 3) Social resources will moderate treatment efficacy, such that children with limited social and economic resources will show greater improvements in the more comprehensive TOPS intervention. We hypothesize better teen problem solving and communication skills, fewer teen emotional/behavioral problems, less parental burden and distress, and less parent-teen conflict at follow-up among the TOPS group compared to the IRC group.
Other Names:
  • TOPS
  • IRC
Experimental: Internet Resources Comparison
Families in the IRC group will also receive a computer, printer, and high-speed internet access if they do not currently have these. Additionally, IRC families receive access to a home page of brain injury resources and links (identical to those given on the TOPS and TOPS-TO homepage) but will not be able to access specific session content. This will enable us to equate the groups with respect to access to the information and resources available on the Web.
We will test the following hypotheses: 1) Children with TBI receiving TOPS will have fewer behavior problems, greater social competence, and better functioning than those receiving IRC at both post-treatment and at a 6-month follow-up assessment. 2) Caregivers of children receiving TOPS will report less depression and psychological distress, less parent-child conflict, and better family functioning than those receiving IRC at both post-treatment and at a 6-month follow-up assessment. 3) Social resources will moderate treatment efficacy, such that children with limited social and economic resources will show greater improvements in the more comprehensive TOPS intervention. We hypothesize better teen problem solving and communication skills, fewer teen emotional/behavioral problems, less parental burden and distress, and less parent-teen conflict at follow-up among the TOPS group compared to the IRC group.
Other Names:
  • TOPS
  • IRC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Parent Report Measures
Time Frame: 4 years
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Teen Self-Report Measures
Time Frame: 4 years
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 28, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Craniocerebral Trauma

Clinical Trials on Teen Online Problem Solving

3
Subscribe