Safety and Efficacy Study of Fx-1006A in Patients With Familial Amyloidosis

November 16, 2012 updated by: Pfizer

Safety and Efficacy of Orally Administered Fx-1006A in Patients With Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy (FAP): A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study

This study will examine whether Fx-1006A is effective in halting the progression of Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy (FAP).

Deposition of TTR amyloid is associated with a variety of human diseases. Deposition of amyloid fibrils of variant TTR (primarily V30M) in peripheral nerve tissue produces the condition called FAP.

The prevention of the formation of amyloid by stabilization of the TTR native state should constitute an effective therapy for amyloid diseases. Therapeutic intervention with a TTR stabilizer drug, such as Fx-1006A, is hypothesized to stop progression of the disease in FAP patients. FAP is a uniformly fatal disease and Fx-1006A is intended to halt the relentless neurological deterioration FAP patients experience.

This Phase 2/3 study will enroll early to mid-stage FAP patients in order to interrupt and stabilize the disease at a point in time where progression of motor and autonomic dysfunction can be maximally effected. Male and female patients with FAP with documented V30M TTR mutation will receive Fx-1006A or placebo once daily for a period of eighteen (18) months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Deposition of TTR amyloid is associated with a variety of human diseases. Deposition of amyloid fibrils of variant TTR (primarily V30M) in peripheral nerve tissue produces the condition called FAP.

The prevention of the formation of amyloid by stabilization of the TTR native state should constitute an effective therapy for amyloid diseases. Therapeutic intervention with a TTR stabilizer drug, such as Fx-1006A, is hypothesized to stop progression of the disease in FAP patients. FAP is a uniformly fatal disease and Fx-1006A is intended to halt the relentless neurological deterioration FAP patients experience.

This Phase 2/3 study will enroll early to mid-stage FAP patients in order to interrupt and stabilize the disease at a point in time where progression of motor and autonomic dysfunction can be maximally effected. Male and female patients with FAP with documented V30M TTR mutation will receive Fx-1006A or placebo once daily for a period of eighteen (18) months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Buenos Aires Province
      • Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina, C1428AQK
        • FLENI-Hepatology and Organ Transplant Dept.
    • Southeast
      • Rio de Janeiro, Southeast, Brazil, Cep 21945-560
        • Hospital Universitário Prof. Clementino Fraga Filho-UFRJ
    • Ile de France
      • Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Ile de France, France, 94275
        • CHU de Bicêtre
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Munster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 48149
        • Universitatsklinikum Munster, Transplant Hepatology
    • Lisbon
      • Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, 1649-035
        • Serviço de Neurologia-Hospital de Santa Maria
    • Norte
      • Porto, Norte, Portugal, 4099-001
        • Unidade Clinica de Paramiloidose-Hospital Santo Antonio
    • Catalunya
      • Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
    • Vasterbotten County
      • Umea, Vasterbotten County, Sweden, SE-901 85
        • Umeå University Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
        • Kings College Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • MGH Neuropathy Laboratory

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Amyloid documented by biopsy.
  2. Documented V30M TTR mutation.
  3. Peripheral and/or autonomic neuropathy with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥50.
  4. Patient is 18-75 years old.
  5. If female, patient is post-menopausal, surgically sterilized, or willing to use an acceptable method of birth control. If male with a female partner of childbearing potential, willing to use an acceptable method of birth control for the duration of the study. For both females and males, birth control must be used for at least 3 months after the last dose of study medication.
  6. Patient is, in the opinion of the investigator, willing and able to comply with the study medication regimen and all other study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
  2. Primary amyloidosis.
  3. If female, patient is pregnant or breast feeding.
  4. Prior liver transplantation.
  5. No recordable sensory threshold for vibration perception in both feet, as measured by CASE IV.
  6. Positive results for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV), and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  7. Renal insufficiency or liver function test abnormalities.
  8. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification ≥III.
  9. Other causes of sensorimotor neuropathy (B12 deficiency, Diabetes Mellitus, HIV treated with retroviral medications, thyroid disorders, alcohol abuse, and chronic inflammatory diseases).
  10. Co-morbidity anticipated to limit survival to less than 18 months.
  11. Patient received an investigational drug/device and/or participated in another clinical investigational study within 60 days before Baseline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1.
Fx-1006A
Fx-1006A 20mg or matched placebo once daily (at the same time each day) for a period of 18 Months
Placebo Comparator: 2.
Placebo
Fx-1006A 20mg or matched placebo once daily (at the same time each day) for a period of 18 Months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 18
Time Frame: Month 18
Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to less than[<] 2) in NIS-LL score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
Month 18
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 18
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 18
Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
Baseline, Month 18

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) Score at Month 6, 12 and 18
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left and right limbs. Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) are scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) were scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 6 and 12
Time Frame: Month 6, 12
Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to <2) in NIS-LL score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
Month 6, 12
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12
Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
Baseline, Month 6, 12
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Domain Scores at Month 6, 12 and 18
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Norfolk QOL-DN:35-item participant-rated questionnaire to assess impact of DN on QOL; Item 1-7:scored as 1=symptom present, 0=symptom absent. Item 8-35: scored on 5-point Likert scale: 0=no problem, 4=severe problem (except item 32: -2=much better, 0=about same, 2=much worse). Norfolk QOL-DN summarized in 5 domains(score range):physical functioning/large fiber neuropathy(-2 to 58), activities of daily living(ADLs) (0 to 20), symptoms(0 to 32), small fiber neuropathy(0 to 16), autonomic neuropathy(0 to 12); higher score=greater impairment, for each. Total score=-2 to138(higher score=worse QOL).
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Change From Baseline in Summated 7 Score for Large Nerve Fiber Function at Month 6, 12 and 18
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Summated 7 score: composite score included five Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) attributes (peroneal nerve distal motor latency, peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity, tibial nerve distal motor latency, and sural nerve sensory nerve action potential amplitude) along with Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) obtained in great toes, and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) value. Score was determined through reference to normal values for age, sex and height. Total score range= -26 to 26, where higher score=worse nerve function.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Change From Baseline in Summated 3 Score for Small Nerve Fiber Function at Month 6, 12 and 18
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviates Score (NTSFnds) included cooling threshold for the lower limbs, heat pain threshold for the lower limbs and HRDB. Total score range= -11.2 to 11.2, where higher score=worse nerve function.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Change From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Month 6, 12 and 18
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared. mBMI was calculated by multiplying BMI by serum albumin levels to compensate for edema formation associated with malnutrition. A progressive decline in mBMI indicated worsening of disease severity.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Transthyretin (TTR) Tetramer
Time Frame: Week 8, Month 6, 12, 18
TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI.
Week 8, Month 6, 12, 18

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jeff Packman, FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

Clinical Trials on Fx-1006A

3
Subscribe