Stress, Distress Intolerance, and Drug Dependence

July 8, 2019 updated by: Michael Otto, Boston University Charles River Campus
This study is designed to evaluate the relative efficacy of a novel treatment (CBT-IC) versus a standard individual drug-counseling treatment. The novel treatment emphasizes exposure to emotional cues for drug use as part of a comprehensive, yet brief, treatment strategy. These treatments are delivered to opiate-dependent, often poly-substance dependent, individuals in a comprehensive methadone maintenance program who have failed to respond adequately to current treatments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study study is designed to test further the efficacy of Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Interoceptive Cues (CBT-IC - a treatment with a central focus on enhancing a patient's tolerance to the myriad forms of distress-sadness, boredom, anxiety, withdrawal sensations, etc.-that are linked to the stressful lives of drug-dependent individuals, and breaking the link between these emotional cues and drug-related attempts to avoid emotional distress) for intervening with chronically-stressed and treatment-resistant opiate-dependent outpatients. Features of this study of particular relevance to to RFA DA-04-001 include: (1) a focus on opiate-dependent patients undergoing chronic stress; (2) a model for the way in which chronic stress translates into chronic drug use; (2) a focus on the way in which stress-related symptoms serve as trigger for drug use; (3) a focus on both mediators and moderators of treatment that will inform treatment-matching efforts, including a focus on gender differences and emotional avoidance/distress intolerance; and (4) the examination of treatment outcome in a Stage II treatment trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

133

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Bay Cove Treatment Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Habit Management Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The primary selection criteria include women and men between the ages of 18 and 65 who:

    1. Meet DSM-IV criteria for opiate dependence,
    2. Maintain a stable dose of methadone for two weeks prior to recruitment and,
    3. a) fail to achieve "take-home" status for methadone dosing during at least the first four months of methadone treatment, b) test positive on at least two toxicology screens for illicit drugs during the month prior to recruitment c) have never achieved two consecutive toxicology screens free of illicit substances since entering the current treatment episode.
    4. Meet study criteria for chronic stress

      1. unemployment criteria, and
      2. affective disorder criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Patients with significantly unstable or uncontrolled medical illness which may interfere with participation in treatment (e.g., patients likely to require hospitalization during the study period).

    (2) Patients with a psychotic or organic mental disorder according to DSM-IV criteria.

    (3) Patients receiving medication affecting methadone metabolism (e.g. rifampin).

    (4) Patients with uncontrolled bipolar disorder as evidenced by meeting current criteria for mania or hypomania or meeting criteria for rapid cycling in the last year (as indicated by structured questioning of all patients meeting criteria for bipolar disorder).

    (5) Patients unable to complete the informed consent or unable to understand study procedures in the informed consent process.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
12 weekly sessions and 3 booster sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy
Other Names:
  • CBT
Active Comparator: 2
Individual Counseling
12 weekly sessions and 3 booster sessions of individual counseling
Other Names:
  • ICT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Positive Toxicology Swabs for Illicit Substances
Time Frame: Weekly assessments with summation over three time periods: baseline, treatment, and eight weeks of follow-up.
The primary outcome assessment for this study was the percentage of oral toxicology swabs that were positive of illicit substances. Participants completed these swabs at each assessment point, as well as at each study therapy session. Toxicology swabs were supervised by study staff and used oral specimen collection to screen for opiates, methadone, cocaine, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, THC, and barbiturates.
Weekly assessments with summation over three time periods: baseline, treatment, and eight weeks of follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Addiction Severity Index (ASI) Drug Composite Index
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid Treatment, Treatment Endpoint, Follow-up Evaluation 1, Follow-up Evaluation 2
The composite score for drug use is determined by answers to 13 questions on the ASI: A/390 + B/390 + C/390 + D/390 + E/390 + F/390 + G/390 +H/390 + I/390 + J/390 + K/390 + L/52 + M/52. A single score is provided, with possible scores ranging from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicate greater drug use.
Baseline, Mid Treatment, Treatment Endpoint, Follow-up Evaluation 1, Follow-up Evaluation 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael W. Otto, Ph.D., Boston University
  • Principal Investigator: Mark H. Pollack, M.D., Rush University
  • Principal Investigator: Steven A. Safren, Ph.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

February 2, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01DA017904 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Dependence

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Subscribe