Presentation of Lumbar Disc and Reduction of Symptoms (POLDAROS)

June 8, 2015 updated by: St George's, University of London

Reduction in Leg and Back Pain Following Lumbar Microdiscetomy in Those Shown the Removed Disc Fragments After the Operation: a Double Blind Randomized Control Trial.

The trial aims to assess the hypothesis that presentation of the disc material to the patient following a lumbar microdiscectomy would positively influence the improvement in their leg and back symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Objective. The trial aims to assess the hypothesis that presentation of removed material to the patient following a lumbar microdiscectomy would positively influence the improvement in their radiculopathic and degenerative symptoms.

Design. Data will be collected prospectively. Patient allocation to treatment groups will be by simple randomization using a computer generated sequence of random numbers. Trial participants will be blinded as to the trial hypothesis and investigators blinded to patient allocation.

Setting. Patients will all be treated in a single secondary care unit.

Participants. All adult patients undergoing a planned lumbar microdiscectomy for radiculopathy due to a prolapsed intervertebral disc over a six month period will be considered for entry into the trial. Exclusion criteria: inability to give verbal consent, age less than 18, previous spinal surgery, emergency discectomies, patients having spinal fusions and those with no radiculopathic symptoms.

Intervention. Patients allocated to the experimental arm will be given the removed disc fragments to keep once they have recovered from anaesthesia. Those in the control arm will not be shown disc fragments (best available treatment).

Main outcome measure. The degree of improvement in radiculopathic and degenerative symptoms reported by the patient at 2-3 months after surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 0RE
        • St George's Hospital, University of London

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients undergoing a planned lumbar microdiscectomy for radiculopathy due to a prolapsed intervertebral disc

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to give verbal consent, age less than 18, previous spinal surgery, emergency discectomies, patients having spinal fusions and those with no radiculopathic symptoms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
EXPERIMENTAL: experimental
Participants are given their disc fragments following their operation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subjective experience of radiculopathic pain by the patient following surgery
Time Frame: 2-4 months
2-4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subjective experience of low back pain by the patient following surgery
Time Frame: 2-4 months
2-4 months
Subjective experience of lower limb motor weakness by the patient following surgery
Time Frame: 2-4 months
2-4 months
Subjective experience of paraesthesia by the patient following surgery
Time Frame: 2-4 months
2-4 months
Maximum walking distance
Time Frame: 2-4 months
2-4 months
Altered pattern of use of analgesia
Time Frame: 2-4 months
2-4 months
Subjective experience of numbness by the patient following surgery
Time Frame: 2-4 months
2-4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marios C Papadopoulos, DLitt, St George's, University of London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 27, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radiculopathy

Clinical Trials on Presentation of excised intervertebral disc fragments

Subscribe