Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Pregabalin Compared To Placebo For Treatment Of Post-Surgical Pain From Hysterectomy

A Multiple Dose, Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Pregabalin Compared To Placebo In The Treatment Of Patients With Post-Surgical Pain From Hysterectomy

To assess the efficacy of pregabalin compared to placebo on pain following hysterectomy , measured using subject reported assessments of pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

501

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3J4
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H 5N4
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Praha 5, Czechia, 150 06
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Parktown, South Africa, 2193
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Gauteng
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, 1829
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Krugersdorp, Gauteng, South Africa, 1752
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa, 0157
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • KZN
      • Ladysmith, KZN, South Africa, 3370
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • KwaZulu Natal
      • Newcastle, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, 2940
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7500
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Cadiz, Spain, 11009
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28031
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Lund, Sweden, 221 85
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Orebro, Sweden, 701 85
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 182 88
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Bangkok
      • Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Chiang Mai
      • Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Khon Kaen
      • Muang, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L8 7SS
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Livingstone, United Kingdom, EH54 6PP
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Leicestershire
      • Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Scotland
      • Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36608
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85308
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85023
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85020
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85027
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • California
      • Glendale, California, United States, 91206
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136-1096
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77024
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77054
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject will have elective total abdominal hysterectomy using a transverse incision with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The total hysterectomy may, however, be cervix-sparing.
  • The subject is expected to remain at the hospital (or intermediate care facility) for a minimum of 2 days following surgery.
  • The subject's preoperative health is graded as the American Society of Anesthesiologist P1 to P2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects having vaginal hysterectomy (whether laparoscopically assisted or not)
  • Subjects having additional procedures (such as those involving the bladder) at the same time as the total abdominal hysterectomy
  • The use of nerve block, spinal anesthesia or epidural anesthesia for post-surgical pain control
  • Subjects who have been using any opioid medications 2 weeks or more continuously within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
  • The subject has taken any NSAID or any analgesic other than acetaminophen within 3 days prior to surgery or is unwilling to abstain from NSAIDs or other analgesics, except as specified in the protocol, during the study. (Subjects taking <325 mg per day of aspirin at a stable dose for at least 30 days before the first dose of study medication will be allowed to continue their aspirin regimen for the duration of the study).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
150 mg/day double blind (divided doses)
300 mg/day double blind (divided doses)
Experimental: 2
150 mg/day double blind (divided doses)
300 mg/day double blind (divided doses)
Placebo Comparator: 3
matched placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Worst Pain Using the Modified Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-sf)
Time Frame: Day 2 (24 hours post surgery [PS])

Modified Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-sf): participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Least Square (LS) Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.

Day 2 (24 hours post surgery [PS])

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Current Pain - Pain With Movement Caused by Sitting
Time Frame: Day 1 (day of surgery), up to 7 days PS, Discharge, 2 and 4 weeks PS
Participant sat upright from supine position, followed by 120 second (sec) rest period, during which participant asked to rate pain with movement. Assessment performed 3 times each day of hospital stay, with 1 daily assessment at 24 (+/- 2) hour interval from end of surgery. Current pain reported on 11 point Likert scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Day 1 (day of surgery), up to 7 days PS, Discharge, 2 and 4 weeks PS
Current Pain - Pain With Movement Caused by Peak Expiratory (PEF) Test
Time Frame: Day 1, up to 7 days PS, 2 and 4 weeks PS
Current pain with movement caused by peak expiratory flow (PEF) test as reported by participant on 11 point Likert scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Assessment performed 3 times each day of hospital stay, with 1 daily assessment at 24 (+/- 2) hour interval from end of surgery. PEF test performed 3 times, with 120sec rest periods in between. At beginning of each rest period, participant asked to rate pain caused by forced expiration. LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Day 1, up to 7 days PS, 2 and 4 weeks PS
Area Under the Curve (AUC) Pain - Pain With Movement Caused by Sitting
Time Frame: 48 +/- 4 hours PS
Time-normalized AUC of pain with movement caused by sitting reported by participants. Participant sat upright from supine position, followed by a 120sec rest period, during which the participant asked to rate pain with movement. Assessment performed 3 times each day of hospital stay, with 1 daily assessment at 24 (+/- 2) hour interval from end of surgery. Current pain reported on 11 point Likert scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
48 +/- 4 hours PS
Area Under the Curve (AUC) Pain - Pain With Movement Caused by Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Test
Time Frame: 48 +/- 4 hours PS
Time-normalized AUC of pain reported by participants with movement caused by PEF test. Pain reported by participant on 11 point Likert scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). PEF test performed 3 times, with 120sec rest periods in between. At beginning of each rest period, participant asked to rate pain caused by forced expiration. LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
48 +/- 4 hours PS
Current Pain at Rest
Time Frame: 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 hours PS
Pain reported by participants at rest (numeric rating scale (NRS) - Current Pain) on an 11 point Likert scale 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain). Pain at rest during the hospital stay was assessed just before each Pain with Movement assessment. Assessment performed 3 times each day of hospital stay, with 1 of daily assessments at 24 (+/- 2 ) hour intervals from end of surgery. LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 hours PS
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Pain at Rest During the First Two Days of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: 48 +/- 4 hours PS
Time-normalized AUC of pain reported by participants on 11 point Likert scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
48 +/- 4 hours PS
Total Cumulative Dose of Opioids Following Surgery
Time Frame: 24, 48 Hours PS, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Total cumulative dose was calculated as milligram (mg) of morphine equivalent and included opioids administered by any route. LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
24, 48 Hours PS, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Integrated Analgesic Score
Time Frame: 0-24, 24-48, 48-72 hours PS
The integrated analgesic score (a combination of opioid use and either worst pain, or pain at rest, or pain caused by sitting, or pain caused by forced expiration as defined by Silverman et al 1993) was the sum of percent differences from mean rank for pain and opioids and ranged from -200 to 200 where lower values represent improvement. LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
0-24, 24-48, 48-72 hours PS
Non-opioid Rescue Medication - Paracetamol
Time Frame: 24, 48, 72 hours PS, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Week 1, 2, 3, 4 PS,
The amounts of non-opioid rescue medications, paracetamol, used by the participants during the study, including anti-emetic medications.
24, 48, 72 hours PS, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Week 1, 2, 3, 4 PS,
Anxiety Before and After Surgery
Time Frame: Surgery day before first dose and 1 hour after first dose, Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 PS and Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Participant anxiety reported on Visual Anxiety Scale (VAS), 0 (not at all anxious) to 100 (extremely anxious). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata
Surgery day before first dose and 1 hour after first dose, Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 PS and Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Non-opioid Rescue Medication - Ibuprofen
Time Frame: 24, 48, 72 hours PS, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Week 1, 2, 3, 4 PS
The amounts of non-opioid rescue medications, ibuprofen, used by the participants during the study, including anti-emetic medications.
24, 48, 72 hours PS, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Week 1, 2, 3, 4 PS
Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Expiratory Flow
Time Frame: Baseline, every 8 hours (up to 232 hours) PS, and Discharge (Day 3-7 PS flexible)
Change from baseline= PEF at x hours minus PEF at baseline; possible values ranged from 0-900 liters/minute (higher values indicated better lung function). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Baseline, every 8 hours (up to 232 hours) PS, and Discharge (Day 3-7 PS flexible)
Timed Up-and-Go (TUG)
Time Frame: Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 PS and Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Functional mobility test performed once a day at 24 hour intervals from surgery after the pain with movement assessment. LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 PS and Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Average Daily Pain
Time Frame: Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, PS; week 2, 3, 4 PS
Post-discharge average pain as measured in daily participant diaries NRS an 11 point Likert scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, PS; week 2, 3, 4 PS
Worst Daily Pain
Time Frame: Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 7, 14, 28 PS
Post-discharge worst pain as measured in daily participant diaries NRS an 11 point Likert scale that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). LS Means from ANOVA model with terms of treatment, pooled center, salpingo-oophorectomy strata and baseline worst pain score.
Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 7, 14, 28 PS
Sleep Interference
Time Frame: Daily post hospital discharge ( Day 2-7 PS), Week 2, 3, 4 PS
Sleep interference post surgery measured daily in participant diaries; NRS of how pain interfered with sleep during the last 24 hours, ranged from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Daily post hospital discharge ( Day 2-7 PS), Week 2, 3, 4 PS
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (m-BPI-sf): Pain Interference Index Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 7, 14, 28 PS
m-BPI-sf: participant-rated 11 point Likert rating scale ranging from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) with functional activities (general activity, mood, walking ability, relations with other people, sleep, normal work, and enjoyment of life) in past 24 hours. LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Baseline, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 7, 14, 28 PS
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (m-BPI-sf): Pain Severity Index Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 7, 14, 28 PS

m-BPI-sf: participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible). Pain severity index is the mean of item scores 2, 3, and 4 (pain right now, worst pain, and average pain level).

LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.

Baseline, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 7, 14, 28 PS
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Surgery Day
Time Frame: Day 1
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 1
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Day 1 PS
Time Frame: Day 1 PS
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 1 PS
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Day 2 PS
Time Frame: Day 2 PS
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 2 PS
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Day 3 PS
Time Frame: Day 3 PS
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 3 PS
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Day 4 PS
Time Frame: Day 4 PS
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 4 PS
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Day 5 PS
Time Frame: Day 5 PS
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 5 PS
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Discharge
Time Frame: Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Day 7 PS
Time Frame: Day 7 PS
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 7 PS
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Day 14 PS
Time Frame: Day 14 PS
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 14 PS
Participant Satisfaction With Study Medication - Day 28 PS
Time Frame: Day 28 PS
Participant satisfaction with study medication using the Global Evaluation of Study Medication questionaire. Participants overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication was recorded by the participant by answering the following question: How would you rate the study medication you received for pain? Excellent 4; Good 3; Fair 2; Poor 1.
Day 28 PS
Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS): Satisfaction With Current Pain Medication
Time Frame: Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 28 PS
Satisfaction with current pain medication ranged from 0 (worst possible response) to100 (best possible response). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 28 PS
Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS): Impact of Current Pain Medication
Time Frame: Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 28 PS
Impact of current pain medication response scale: 0 (worst possible response) to 100 (best possible response). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 28 PS
Quality of Life Using EuroQol (EQ-5D) Health State Profile
Time Frame: Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS) and day 28 PS
Participant rated questionnaire assessed current health for 6 domains: mobility/self-care/ usual activities/pain/discomfort/anxiety and depression. Scoring developed by EuroQol Group assigned a utility value for each domain in the profile. Scores ranged from 1 better health (no problems) to 3 worst health (eg, "confined to bed"). Score transformed and resulted in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score=better health state. Health profile scores estimated using Dolan computational algorithms 1997 and 2001. LS Means adjusted for treatment/pooled center/salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS) and day 28 PS
Time to Meet Hospital Discharge Criteria
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Day 7 PS
Mean time from end of surgery to meet protocol defined hospital discharge criteria: participant no longer received parental opioids, was able to dress and mobilize without assistance, and had normal intake of food and fluids.
Day 1 up to Day 7 PS
Time to Actual Discharge
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Day 7 PS
Mean time from end of surgery to actual hospital discharge. Participant was expected to remain at the hospital for a minimum of 2 days following surgery.
Day 1 up to Day 7 PS
Incidence of Chronic Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 3 and 6 Months PS
Chronic post-operative pain as a result of abdominal hysterectomy as reported by participants on PS questionaire of pain within last 24 hours in area affected by surgery.
3 and 6 Months PS
Total Clinically Meaningful Event (CME) Score
Time Frame: Surgery Day, Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 PS, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 7, 14, 28 PS
Total CME score calculated by summing the number of Clinically Meaningful Events (CMEs) across symptoms. CME for each symptom will be defined using the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS) a participant rated scale of symptoms within the last 24 hours. Total CME score could range from 0 to 9. LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Surgery Day, Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 PS, Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS), Day 7, 14, 28 PS

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Wound Healing Complications - Discharge
Time Frame: Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Pre-specified adverse events of wound healing complications based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) wound healing complications included: superficial incisional SSI, deep incisional SSI, organ/space SSI or non-infections wound healing complication.
Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Percentage of Participants With Wound Healing Complications - Day 7 PS
Time Frame: Day 7 PS
Pre-specified adverse events of wound healing complications based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) wound healing complications included: superficial incisional SSI, deep incisional SSI, organ/space SSI or non-infections wound healing complication.
Day 7 PS
Percentage of Participants With Wound Healing Complications - Day 14 PS
Time Frame: Day 14 PS
Pre-specified adverse events of wound healing complications based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) wound healing complications included: superficial incisional SSI, deep incisional SSI, organ/space SSI or non-infections wound healing complication.
Day 14 PS
Percentage of Participants With Wound Healing Complications - Day 28 PS
Time Frame: Day 28 PS
Pre-specified adverse events of wound healing complications based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) wound healing complications included: superficial incisional SSI, deep incisional SSI, organ/space SSI or non-infections wound healing complication.
Day 28 PS
Percentage of Participants With Wound Healing Complications - End of Treatment
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Day 28 PS
Pre-specified adverse events of wound healing complications based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) wound healing complications included: superficial incisional SSI, deep incisional SSI, organ/space SSI or non-infections wound healing complication.
Day 1 up to Day 28 PS
Incision Length Correlated With Worst Pain
Time Frame: Day 1
Incision length (cm) correlated with worst pain. Worst pain ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center, salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Day 1
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Time Frame: Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)
Pain characteristics in participants who reported pain (mBPI-sf, NPSI); NPSI a participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain, burning spontaneous pain, pressing spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dysesthesia at discharge. NPSI Total Score ranged from 0 to 0.5; NPSI subscales pain ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). LS Means adjusted for treatment, pooled center and salpingo-oophorectomy strata.
Discharge (day 3 up to day 7 PS)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

May 3, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on pregabalin (Lyrica)

3
Subscribe