Reducing Sex-Related HIV Risk Behaviors in Patients Receiving Treatment for Opioid Dependence (Project RED)

April 1, 2020 updated by: Yale University
The major goal is to determine in patients entering buprenorphine treatment, the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors, their physician's screening of these behaviors and to evaluate the impact of risk reduction counseling.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The profile of opioid dependence is changing in the United States. According to the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 3.7 million Americans had used heroin at least once in their lifetime and over half a million individuals had used heroin within the past year. Approximately 323,000 individuals met criteria for past-year heroin abuse or dependence. While these figures are concerning, the increasing prevalence of prescription opioid abuse and dependence is also worrisome. In 2006 12.6 million reported non-medical use of prescription opioids. Of these, 1.6 million met criteria for prescription opioid abuse or dependence. Sex-related HIV risk behaviors are prevalent amongst opioid dependent individuals with one study reporting unprotected intercourse within the prior 30 days in 75% of patients. Given that 79-85% of U.S. HIV/AIDS cases are secondary to sexual transmission, as non-injecting drug use increases, the relative contribution of sex-related HIV risk behaviors will increase as well. While drug treatment with methadone, and more recently buprenorphine (BUP), a new medication effective for the treatment of opioid dependence that can be prescribed by office-based physicians, has been shown to decrease drug-related HIV risk behaviors, my prior research demonstrates that BUP does not appear to impact as significantly on sex-related HIV risk behaviors. While the process of HIV risk behavior change begins with risk assessment, studies have shown that physicians, in general, frequently do not address risky behaviors with their patients. The current literature is lacking, however, with regards to the prevalence of specific high-risk sexual behaviors in patients enrolled in BUP treatment. Interventions specifically targeted at counseling for sex-related HIV risk behaviors delivered to patients receiving BUP treatment have not been refined. The proposed research will evaluate the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors in patients enrolled in office-based BUP treatment and the patients' perception of their providers' screening for these behaviors (Phase 1). These results will inform the conduct of a subsequent randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a sex-related HIV risk reduction counseling intervention (Phase 2).

Phase 1. We hypothesize that sex-related HIV risk behaviors are prevalent in opioid dependent patients enrolled in BUP treatment and that patients will report that their providers fail to screen for these behaviors. The specific aims are to determine in patients entering BUP treatment: 1) the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors, and 2) by patient report, their provider's screening of these behaviors.

Phase 2. We hypothesize that in opioid dependent patients receiving office-based BUP, Enhanced Sexual Risk Management (ESRM) will be more effective in increasing specific safe sex practices compared with standard physician counseling, Standard Sexual Risk Management (SSRM) and that it will demonstrate cost-effectiveness overall when compared to SSRM. The specific aims of this randomized clinical trial are 1) to determine the efficacy of ESRM compared to SSRM, in individuals enrolled in BUP treatment and 2) To compare the cost-effectiveness of ESRM versus SSRM in individuals enrolled in BUP treatment. These interventions will be adapted from existing effective interventions evaluated in two recently conducted multi-site randomized clinical trials, the CDC-funded Project RESPECT and the NIMH-funded Project Light.20, 21

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
        • Yale-New Haven Hospital
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
        • Methadone Research Unit, The APT Foundation, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for current opioid dependence
  • HIV risk behaviors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current dependence on benzodiazepines or sedatives
  • current suicide or homicide risk
  • current psychotic disorder or untreated major depression
  • inability to read or understand English
  • unstable medical problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Enhanced Sexual Risk Management (ESRM): Patients assigned to ESRM will attend 4 individual gender-specific interactive counseling sessions, once weekly over a four-week period. They will attend 2 sessions (20 minutes, weeks 2 and 3) followed by 2 sessions (40 minutes, weeks 4 and 5) that will be gender-specific to the patient and gender-matched with the study physicians (one female and one male) who will be trained in HIV testing and risk counseling. Sessions will include skill-building in condom use, safer sex negotiation, self-control of triggers and coping skills, didactic materials, and distribution of written material and address self-perception of risk, barriers to risk reduction, and negotiation of a risk-reduction plan.
management of sexual risk
Active Comparator: 2
Standard Sexual Risk Management (SSRM): In SSRM, patients will attend two 10-minute gender non-specific individual educational sessions about HIV/AIDS provided by one of the study physicians who will be trained in HIV testing and risk counseling. Session 1 will coincide with the physician visit at the time of randomization. The patient will receive pre-test counseling at this time and undergo HIV antibody testing. Session 2 will take place 7 days later when the patient returns to receive their HIV test results and post-test counseling. In addition, subjects will receive didactic prevention messages about HIV relevant to their reported risks and will be asked if they have questions regarding this information.
management of sexual risk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
proportion of condom use during acts of sexual intercourse
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
number of unprotected vaginal/anal intercourse acts
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
number of sexual partners
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
recent diagnosis of an STD
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
buprenorphine treatment retention
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
abstinence from illicit drug use
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
health status
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
patient and physician satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lynn E Sullivan, MD, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

October 23, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Enhanced Sexual Risk Management

3
Subscribe