EPIC :Anal Incontinence After Delivery. Secondary Prevention With Caesarean Section. (EPIC)

December 14, 2016 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Anal Incontinence After Delivery. Secondary Prevention With Caesarean Section.

Anal incontinence is frequent and treatment is difficult. One of the most important reasons is traumatic delivery. 10 % of women develop anal incontinence after first delivery. This incidence is higher after second vaginal delivery, particularly if the first delivery caused break in the anal sphincter. One possibility to avoid anal incontinence is the caesarean section. So, do the investigators have to recommend caesarean section for second delivery if the first was traumatic? But caesarean section had a morbidity. Actually, the choice between the delivery modalities is very subjective.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Anal incontinence is frequent and treatment is difficult. One of the most important reasons is traumatic delivery. 10 % of women develop anal incontinence after first delivery. This incidence is higher after second vaginal delivery, particularly if the first delivery caused break in the anal sphincter. One possibility to avoid anal incontinence is the caesarean section.

So, do the investigators have to recommend caesarean section for second delivery if the first was traumatic? But caesarean section had a morbidity. Actually, the choice between the delivery modalities is very subjective. It seems to be very useful to compare, in randomized controlled study, global morbidity of caesarean section and vaginal delivery for second delivery if the first had to be traumatic after forceps with anal sphincter rupture diagnosed with anal endosonography. In start of study, all women were included, for randomisation ("section cesarean prophylactic" versus "vaginal delivery") if an anal sphincter rupture is diagnosed with anal endosonography before second delivery. . Currently, in case of refusal randomisation, women are proposed to participate to the ancillary study (cohort study).

The primary endpoint is comparison of median incontinence score of VAISEY in the two arms after 6 months. The secondary endpoints are urinary incontinence, quality of life and global morbidity between the two arms after second delivery. The investigators estimated, needing 123 women in each arm.

Hospital investigators are: BICHAT Claude Bernard (Pr LUTON), Armand Trousseau (Pr BENIFLA), Jean VERDIER (Pr CARBILLON), BEAUJON (Pr LUTON), Louis MOURIER (Pr MANDELBROT), Versailles (Dr PANEL). Inclusion will be for 6 years and 9 months. Women will be included during the last trimester and evaluation will be perform on 8 weeks, 6 and 12 month after delivery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

554

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Hôpital Bichat

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • More than 18 years old
  • Having health insurance
  • Second pregnancy
  • Inclusion in the third trimester
  • First delivery was traumatic
  • No anal incontinence
  • Accept to participate, sign the informed consent
  • Prior medical examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Monitoring impossible
  • Woman who have an anal operation
  • Caesarean section
  • First delivery with anal break stage 4
  • Indication of a scheduled caesarean section not for proctologic reason
  • Patient physically, mentally or legally incompetent to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
caesarean section
Procedure: caesarean section
caesarean section for second delivery if the first had to be traumatic after forceps with anal sphincter rupture diagnosed with anal endosonography.
Active Comparator: 2
vaginal delivery
Procedure: vaginal delivery
vaginal delivery for second delivery if the first had to be traumatic after forceps with anal sphincter rupture diagnosed with anal endosonography.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary endpoint is comparison of median incontinence score of VAIZEY in the two arms after 6 months.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incontinence scores in the two arms after 6/8 weeks and 6 month, transitional anal incontinence after delivery urinary incontinence 6 and 12 month after the delivery, sexual score(IFSI)global morbidity between the two arms after anal endoscopy
Time Frame: 6 month and 12 month
6 month and 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurent ABRAMOWITZ, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P060246

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fecal Incontinence

Clinical Trials on caesarean section

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Hong Kong

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe