Pelvipower for Faecal Incontinence

June 1, 2023 updated by: Dr Anthony Hobson, The Functional Gut Clinic

Pilot Study to Determine Clinical Efficacy of Extracorporeal Pelvic Floor Magnetic Neuromuscular Stimulation in Patients With Faecal Incontinence.

Faecal incontinence (FI) is a common condition which drastically reduces patient's quality of life and for which there are few effective treatments. The causes of FI are multiple and include disturbances in neuromuscular function (and structure) of the anal canal, rectum and pelvic floor. Treatment options include antidiarrheals, laxatives, biofeedback, surgery, SNS and PTNS. This study will test the Pelvipower extracorporeal magnetic stimulation device as a treatment for faecal incontinence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

First line treatment with antidiarrheal or laxative therapy can fail, and then it is common practice to employ biofeedback and physiotherapy techniques as second line conservative management strategies with the aim of improving muscle strength, sensory awareness and effective toileting technique, which in turn helps to reduce FI episodes . Whilst these techniques can be effective, a significant proportion of patients remain symptomatic and are then considered for potential surgical treatment.

Surgical treatment of FI can involve improving the structural integrity of the anal sphincter with a repair procedure, or via implantation of an electrical neurostimulator (sacral nerve stimulation - SNS). SNS has been shown to be effective in treating FI, but the procedure is invasive and expensive.

Percutaneous tibial stimulation (PTNS) is an intermediate treatment which involves stimulating the nerves on the top of the foot which project to the same spinal regions as those influenced through SNS. This requires patients to attend an outpatient clinic for up to 12 sessions, each lasting around 30-45 minutes. Stimulation is delivered via needle electrodes which connect to a stimulation device. A course of treatment costs approximately £2000 per patient for 1-year of treatment.

Whilst SNS and PTNS utilise electric neural stimulation, an alternative approach is through the use of magnetic stimulation as a way of activating neural pathways and inducing neuromuscular recovery. The technique is thought to work on the nerves and muscular structures in the anal canal. This technique has been employed in a broad range of disorders. Magnetic stimulation has some advantages as it can be delivered completely non-invasively using different sized magnetic coils placed over the region of interest.

Pelvipower (PonteMed AG, Switzerland) extracorporeal magnetic stimulation device built into a patient friendly chair, incorporating a rapid rate magnetic stimulation system through a stimulation coil. The coil can be used to non-invasively stimulate the nerves and muscles in the pelvic floor that contribute to continence, and it has several potential advantages over existing techniques in terms of cost and convenience, with 6-12 weekly 15 minute sessions currently normal practice. Pelvipower has been used successfully in patients with urinary incontinence, but thus far little research exists in terms of its effect in treating faecal incontinence. However, one study of extracorporeal magnetic stimulation applied via a similar chair apparatus demonstrated increased muscle function in the anal canal, as well as a significant decrease in faecal incontinence. Although faecal incontinence was shown to improve in participants, the study did not include a sham treatment comparison group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the extracorporeal magnetic stimulation on faecal incontinence, using the Pelvipower© chair compared to a sham treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. >18 years of age
  2. Female
  3. Have suffered from faecal incontinence, for >6 months, sufficiently severe enough to warrant intervention . Previous exposure to treatment is not a contraindication to this.
  4. Body Mass Index between 18.9 and 40.0kg/m2 (bounds included)
  5. >6 months post-natal
  6. ≥4 FI episodes during 2 week screening period

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neurological disease which may affect continence (i.e. diabetic neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease etc)
  2. Thromboses
  3. Suffering from or recovering from a serious illness or operation
  4. Faecal incontinence secondary to impaction
  5. Currently using rectal irrigation
  6. Currently undergoing biofeedback therapy
  7. Pregnancy
  8. Pacemaker in situ
  9. Indwelling metal implants
  10. Recent skeletomuscular injury or surgery in the last month
  11. Congenital anorectal disorders such as cloacal defect
  12. Participant has a > grade 2 rectal prolapse
  13. Absence of native rectum due to surgery (anterior resection)
  14. Previous anal/rectal surgery in the past 12 months
  15. Stoma in situ
  16. Chronic bowel diseases with chronic uncontrolled diarrhoea
  17. Unable to discontinue Loperamide during washout period
  18. Severe cardiac arrhythmia
  19. Epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation
A test used to measure the strength of the muscles in the anal canal
An examination of the anal canal (back passage) that allows us to see the muscles involved in passing stool and the tissues that surround these.
A daily diary to assess episodes of faecal incontinence
Questionnaire to assess individual symptoms, general wellbeing and activity in faecal incontinence
Questionnaire to assess the quality of life with faecal incontinence
Questionnaire to assess the severity of faecal incontinence
At 28 days and 3 months post final pelvipower or sham session to assess faecal incontience after study period
A score of incontinence
Experimental: Pelvipower chair
A test used to measure the strength of the muscles in the anal canal
An examination of the anal canal (back passage) that allows us to see the muscles involved in passing stool and the tissues that surround these.
A daily diary to assess episodes of faecal incontinence
Questionnaire to assess individual symptoms, general wellbeing and activity in faecal incontinence
Questionnaire to assess the quality of life with faecal incontinence
Questionnaire to assess the severity of faecal incontinence
At 28 days and 3 months post final pelvipower or sham session to assess faecal incontience after study period
A score of incontinence

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bowel diary - total FI episodes
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
Assessment of change in total faecal incontinence episodes as measured as a reduction by >= 50%
up to 10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bowel diary - passive FI episodes
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
Assessment of change in passive faecal incontinence episodes as measured as a reduction by >= 50%
up to 10 weeks
Bowel diary - urgency FI Episodes
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
Assessment of change in urge faecal incontinence episodes as measured as a reduction by >= 50%
up to 10 weeks
St Mark's incontinence score
Time Frame: up to 5 months
Effect of extracorporeal magnetic stimulation using the Pelvipower chair on FI, assessed using mean change from randomisation visit to post treatment visit FI scores (as measured by St Marks incontinence score) between treatment and sham groups.
up to 5 months
Loperamide use
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
Mean change in loperamide use from randomisation to post- treatment visit between treatment and sham groups, measured using pre-treatment and post-treatment bowel diaries.
up to 10 weeks
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2 (MYMOP2)
Time Frame: up to 5 months
Mean change from randomisation visit to post-treatment visit in questionnaire total score between treatment and sham groups.
up to 5 months
Faecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire (FIQL)
Time Frame: up to 5 months
Mean change from randomisation visit to post treatment visit in FIQOL score between treatment and sham groups.
up to 5 months
Faecal incontinence symptom index (FISI)
Time Frame: up to 5 months
Mean change from randomisation visit to post treatment visit in FISI score between treatment and sham groups.
up to 5 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of anal canal resting tone
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
A) Mean change from randomisation visit to post treatment in mean anal resting pressure between treatment and sham groups. Measured using high resolution anorectal manometry, measured in mmHg.
up to 10 weeks
Assessment of voluntary anal squeeze pressures
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
Mean change from randomisation visit to post treatment in mean voluntary squeeze pressure between treatment and sham groups - using high resolution anorectal manometry, measured in mmHg.
up to 10 weeks
Assessment of rectal sensation
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
C) Mean change from randomisation visit to post treatment in rectal sensation thresholds (first constant sensation volume, urge to defecate volume and maximum tolerable volume) between treatment and sham groups, using balloon sensation testing as part of anorectal manometry. Thresholds measures of vol of air in balloon (ML) when sensations are noted by the participant.
up to 10 weeks
Assessment of anal sensation
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
Mean change from randomisation visit to post treatment in anal sensitivity between treatment and sham groups. Measured using anorectal manometry and specialised anal sensitivity probes.
up to 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anthony Hobson, The Functional Gut Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

June 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FGC-20-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Faecal Incontinence

Clinical Trials on High Resolution Anorectal Manometry

3
Subscribe