- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00633152
Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline Versus Linezolid in Subjects With Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
February 2, 2017 updated by: Forest Laboratories
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intramuscular Ceftaroline Versus Intravenous Linezolid in Adult Subjects With Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections in adults.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections in adults.
The primary focus is bacterial infection.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
150
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Buena Park, California, United States, 96020
- Investigational Site
-
Long Beach, California, United States, 90813
- Investigational Site
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90015
- Investigational Site
-
Rolling Hills Estate, California, United States, 90274
- Investigational Site
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92114
- Investigational Site
-
-
Florida
-
Atlantis, Florida, United States, 33462
- Investigational Site
-
-
Georgia
-
Columbus, Georgia, United States, 31904
- Investigational Site
-
Savannah, Georgia, United States, 31405
- Investigational Site
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55422
- Investigational Site
-
-
Montana
-
Butte, Montana, United States, 59701
- Investigational Site
-
-
New Jersey
-
Somers Point, New Jersey, United States, 08244
- Investigational Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43215
- Investigational Site
-
Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43608
- Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI)
- Require initial hospitalization, or treatment in an emergency room or urgent care setting
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any ß-lactam, ceftaroline, linezolid, aztreonam, or to their components
- Concomitant use of adrenergic or serotonergic agent
- Uncomplicated skin and skin structure infection
- Concomitant therapy with any drug known to exhibit a contraindicated drug-drug interaction
- More than 24 hours of treatment with an antimicrobial within 96 hours before randomization
- Known or suspected endocarditis, osteomyelitis, or septic arthritis
- Severely impaired renal function
- Evidence of significant hepatic, hematologic, or immunologic disease
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ceftaroline
Intramuscular every 12 hours
|
600 mg injected every 12 hours for at least 5 but not more than 14 days
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: linezolid plus optional aztreonam
Intravenous every 12 hours
|
600 mg parenteral infused over 60 minutes for a minimum of 5 days and a maximum of 14 days
Other Names:
1000 mg infused over 60 minutes every 24 hours may be started with linezolid or added later (up to 72 hours after the first dose of linezolid) for subjects with a gram-negative infection indicated.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
|
The coprimary efficacy outcome measures were the per-subject clinical cure rate at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) and (Modified-Intent-to-Treat) MITT Populations.
Subjects were considered clinically cured at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit if they had total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary.
|
Test of Cure Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
|
|
Clinical Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit (8 to 15 Days after end of therapy)
|
The coprimary efficacy outcome measures were the per-subject clinical cure rate at the TOC Visit in the CE and MITT Populations.
Subjects were considered clinically cured at the TOC Visit if they had total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary.
|
Test of Cure Visit (8 to 15 Days after end of therapy)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Cure Rate at the TOC Visit in the cMITT Population
Time Frame: TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
|
Evaluate per-subject the clinical response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinical Modified Intent-to-treat (cMITT) Population.
|
TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
|
|
Clinical Response at the End-of-Therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT, cMITT and CE Populations.
Time Frame: End-of-therapy (EOT) visit
|
Evaluate per-subject the clinical response at the End-of-therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT, cMITT and CE populations.
|
End-of-therapy (EOT) visit
|
|
The Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit in the mMITT and ME Populations.
Time Frame: TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
|
Evaluate per-subject the microbiological response at the TOC Visit in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-treat (mMITT) and Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) populations.
|
TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
|
|
Clinical and Microbiological Response by Pathogen at the TOC Visit in the mMITT and ME Populations
Time Frame: TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
|
Evaluate the clinical and microbiological response by pathogen at the TOC Visit in the mMITT and ME populations.
|
TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
|
|
Clinical Relapse at the Late Follow-up Visit
Time Frame: Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit (21 to 35 days after end of therapy)
|
Evaluate Clinical relapse rate at Late Follow-up (LFU) (21 to 45 days after the final dose of study drug)in those subjects clinically cured at the TOC visit.
|
Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit (21 to 35 days after end of therapy)
|
|
The Microbiological Reinfection or Recurrence at the Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit
Time Frame: LFU Visit (21 to 35 days after end of therapy)
|
Evaluate per-subject reinfection or recurrence rate at the LFU Visit in those subjects who had a favorable microbiological outcome (eradication or presumed eradication) at the TOC Visit.
|
LFU Visit (21 to 35 days after end of therapy)
|
|
The Safety of Ceftaroline Fosamil
Time Frame: First dose of study drug through LFU Visit or 30 days after the last dose of study drug
|
Evaluate safety of Ceftaroline fosamil IM in adults with complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI)
|
First dose of study drug through LFU Visit or 30 days after the last dose of study drug
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Medical Monitor Cerexa, Forest Laboratories
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 3, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
March 11, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 14, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 2, 2017
Last Verified
February 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
- Abscess
- bacterial infection
- Wound infection
- linezolid
- Gram-negative bacterial infection
- ceftaroline
- Cellulitis
- clinical response
- complicated skin and skin structure infections
- microbiological response
- Deeper soft tissue
- Significant surgical intervention
- Gram-positive bacterial infection
- cephalosporin
- broad-spectrum activity
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Skin Diseases
- Disease Attributes
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
- Skin Diseases, Infectious
- Infections
- Communicable Diseases
- Bacterial Infections
- Skin Diseases, Bacterial
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Protein Synthesis Inhibitors
- Linezolid
- Ceftaroline fosamil
- Aztreonam
- Cephalosporins
Other Study ID Numbers
- P903-19
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bacterial Infection
-
University Hospital, ToursActive, not recruitingInfection, Bacterial | Hemodialysis Catheter InfectionFrance
-
NovartisNovartis VaccinesCompletedBacterial Infection | Streptococcal Infection | Gram-positive Bacterial InfectionBelgium, Canada
-
Clinical Hospital Centre ZagrebRecruiting
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
Karius, Inc.RecruitingInfection | Infections, Bacterial | Parasitic Disease | Infection Viral | Infections, FungalUnited States
-
Kirby InstituteNot yet recruitingInvasive Fungal Infections | Infection, Bacterial | Infection, Fungal | Injection Site Infection | Infection, Soft Tissue | Invasive Bacterial Infection
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesançonUnknownAntibiotic Resistant Infection | Resistant Infection | Beta Lactam Resistant Bacterial Infection | Bacterial Resistance
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUnknown
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...RecruitingBacterial InfectionUnited States
-
University of DuhokRecruitingInfection, BacterialIraq
Clinical Trials on ceftaroline
-
Forest LaboratoriesCompleted
-
Basim AsmarForest LaboratoriesUnknownVentriculoperitoneal Shunt | Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsUnited States
-
Baylor College of MedicineAllerganCompletedCeftaroline for Treatment of Hematogenously Acquired Staphylococcus Aureus Osteomyelitis in ChildrenOsteomyelitis | Bone Infection | Hematogenously Acquired Staphylococcus Aureus OsteomyelitisUnited States
-
Poitiers University HospitalCompleted
-
Albany Medical CollegeForest Laboratories; Albany College of Pharmacy and Health SciencesCompletedCommunity Acquired Bacterial PneumoniaUnited States
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingInfection During Renal Replacement TherapyAustria
-
PfizerCompleted
-
Orlando Health, Inc.Forest LaboratoriesWithdrawnOsteomyelitis | Joint InfectionsUnited States
-
PfizerForest LaboratoriesCompleted
-
Olayemi Osiyemi MDForest LaboratoriesUnknown