Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of Zinforo (Ceftaroline) in Critical Care Patients With Early-onset Pneumonia and Normal or Augmented Renal Clearance (CEFTAREA)

March 7, 2019 updated by: Poitiers University Hospital

Pneumonia is the most frequent infection in critically ill patients and remains a significant challenge to intensivists world-wide due to persisting high mortality and morbidity. Compelling evidence suggests that appropriate antibiotic therapy remains the most important intervention to improve patients' outcome, including the administration of a suitable molecule at an optimized dosage regimen. A vast array of pathophysiological changes can occur in critically ill patients that can complicate antibiotic dosing. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the antibiotics used for the management of critically ill patients is essential for selecting the antibiotic dosing regimens, which will optimize patient outcomes. Changes in volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL) of antibiotics have been noted in these patients, which may affect the antibiotic concentration at the target site. It follows that the pharmacodynamic parameters that determine antibiotic efficacy, which can vary between antibiotic classes, may also be affected. Optimization of these parameters is necessary to maximize the rate of response through patient recovery and minimized antibiotic resistance.

In a multicenter observational study in critically ill patients with normal plasma renal indices at admission, about 65% of patients manifested augmented creatinine clearance on at least one occasion in the first seven study days. Augmented creatinine clearance may significantly impact drug pharmacokinetics for a variety of renally eliminated pharmaceuticals (such as low-molecular weight heparins, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, and β-lactams), leading to subtherapeutic concentrations and potentially adverse clinical outcomes. Currently little data exist that describe the consequences of augmented creatinine clearance on antibiotics PK.

Ceftaroline (600 mg bid) is a cephalosporin with expanded gram-positive activity, including MRSA and penicillin-resistant streptococcus, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 29, 2010 for the treatment of acute bacterial SSSIs and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Ceftaroline showed also good activity against some of the common gram-negative respiratory pathogens (eg, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Neisseria meningitidis, and Pasteurella multocida). However, it does not display clinically relevant activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, or Acinetobacter baumannii. Ceftaroline also lacks activity against gram-negative organisms with extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Importantly, because ceftaroline appears to induce AmpC β-lactamases despite MIC values in susceptible range, ittheoretically should be avoided in gram-negative bacteria known to harbor inducible AmpC β-lactamases (eg, Serratia, Proteus, Citrobacter, Morganella, Enterobacter, Providencia, and P. aeruginosa). In patients, ceftaroline is given as a prodrug, ceftaroline fosamil. After intravenous administration, the prodrug is rapidly transformed by plasma phosphatase enzymes to its bioactive metabolite. The pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline has been evaluated in single and multiple dose studies in healthy volunteers, in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment and in healthy elderly subjects. The volume of distribution is equal to 20.3 L, which corresponds to extracellular fluid volume. The protein binding is low (20%). The main route of elimination is via renal excretion, with a clearance estimated to160 mL/min close to the creatinine clearance. The elimination half-live is 2.6 h in adults with normal renal function. Unfortunately, no PK study has been performed in infected critically ill patients with augmented creatinine clearance. The best PK-PD index predicting drug efficacy is %Time>CMI. A bacteriostatic effect is achieved when free drug concentrations exceed the MIC for 30 to 40% of the dose administration interval (30 to 40%T>MIC). Near maximum organism kill is achieved at 50 to 60%T>MIC (30%T>MIC for Staphylococcus aureus).

This project aims to characterize ceftaroline PK in patients with early-onset pneumonia and augmented creatinine clearance. The choice of ceftaroline is justified by its spectrum suitable for micro-organisms commonly encountered in early onset pneumonia, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Secondary main objective is to predict the probably of reaching PK-PD targets using Monte Carlo simulations under various scenario in order to identify optimal ceftaroline administration schemes in critical care patients with various degrees of renal impairment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Poitiers, France
        • CHU Poitiers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized in ICU
  • Under mechanical ventilation
  • Developing early-onset (during the seven days following hospital admission) pneumonia caused by Gram positive and/or Gram negative bacteria.
  • Having an augmented or normal renal clearance defined by a directly measured creatinine clearance, using MD-RD:

    • normal clearance: between 80 and 130 mL/min/1.73m²
    • augmented clearance: more than or equal to 130 mL/min/1.73m²

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having one or more risk factors of multi drug resistant bacteria:

    • antibiotic treatment in last 3 months
    • high level resistance in the unit
    • immunosuppression
    • one or more pneumonia risks factors, whose one hospitalization of more than 48 hours in past 90 days,
    • living in medical care house,
    • chronic hemodialysis,
    • home based wound care
    • resistant bacteria in the family environment
  • Morbidly obese subjects (BMI>40 kg/m²)
  • Septic shock
  • Ceftaroline administered in past 14 days before inclusion
  • Diuretic treatment
  • Suspicion or confirmation pneumonia ceftaroline-resistant bacteria
  • Known hypersensitivity due to Ceftaroline or cephalosporin antibiotics
  • Known hypersensitivity due to Gentamicin or aminoglycosides antibiotics
  • Hypersensitivity due beta lactamin antibiotics
  • Anemia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Ceftaroline
Patients receive Ceftaroline 600mg BID

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Minimum plasma concentration of Ceftaroline
Time Frame: Day 6
Day 6
Maximum plasma concentration of Ceftaroline
Time Frame: Day 6
Day 6
Volume of distribution of Ceftaroline in plasma
Time Frame: Day 6
Day 6
Clearance of Ceftaroline in plasma
Time Frame: Day 6
Day 6
Elimination half life of Ceftaroline in plasma
Time Frame: Day 6
Day 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetic measures outcomes to obtain the dosing regimens through the monte carlo simulation.
Time Frame: Day 6
in at least 90% of simulated subjects for minimal inhibitory concentration from 0.008 to 32 mg/L
Day 6
Clinical efficacy during Ceftaroline treatment and two weeks after end of it
Time Frame: Day 28
Patients will be considered to have clinical failure if they will have no response to the study drug on the basis of ongoing signs and symptoms of infection. Otherwise, patients will be considered to have clinical success
Day 28
Safety evaluation by adverse events and serious adverse events collection
Time Frame: One month following the last administration
One month following the last administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Ceftaroline

3
Subscribe