Safety And Efficacy Of Celecoxib Versus Sodium Diclofenac In The Treatment Of Acute Low Back Pain

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Of The Safety, Tolerability And Efficacy Of Celecoxib 200 Mg Twice A Day (With A 400 Mg Attack Dose) Versus Sodium Diclofenac 75 Mg Twice A Day In Subjects With Acute Low Back Pain

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of celecoxib versus sodium diclofenac in subjects with acute low back pain

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

244

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BA
      • Salvador, BA, Brazil, 40420-000
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • GO
      • Goiânia, GO, Brazil, 74075-020
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Goiânia, GO, Brazil, 74043-110
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Goiânia, GO, Brazil, 74605-050
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • PR
      • Londrina, PR, Brazil, 86010-010
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • RJ
      • Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 21215-020
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 21941-590
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04039-004
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 08270-070
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Acute low back pain that falls into 1st or 2nd class of 'Quebec Task Force' classification of moderate to severe intensity (>50 mm in the VAS)
  • Acute low back pain onset <72 hours prior to study inclusion and >6 weeks after the last acute low back pain episode

Exclusion criteria:

  • Scoliosis or known history of inflammatory arthritis, chronic pain, metastasis, Paget's disease, or any other disease that cause pain
  • Low back pain from major trauma or visceral disorder
  • Esophageal ulcers, gastric or duodenal ulcers or bleeding within 30 days prior to being administered study drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: A
75 mg oral capsule twice daily for 7 days
EXPERIMENTAL: B
400 mg oral capsule followed by 200 mg oral capsule with the evening meal (>=4 hours from first dose) on Day 1 then 200 mg oral capsule twice daily for 6 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in patient-rated visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity assessment
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subject's quality of life, as measured by the SF-36 Health Survey
Time Frame: Day 7
Day 7
Physical examination
Time Frame: Days 3 and 7
Days 3 and 7
Pain relief score
Time Frame: Days 3 and 7
Days 3 and 7
Vital signs
Time Frame: Days 3 and 7
Days 3 and 7
Adverse events
Time Frame: Days 3 and 7
Days 3 and 7
Change from baseline in VAS pain intensity assessment
Time Frame: Day 7
Day 7
Categorical pain intensity score
Time Frame: Days 3 and 7
Days 3 and 7
Subject's global assessment score
Time Frame: Days 3 and 7
Days 3 and 7
Subject's functional ability, as measured by the "Roland Morris" Questionnaire about low back pain and disability
Time Frame: Day 7
Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2003

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 21, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Diclofenac

3
Subscribe