Safety and Efficacy Study of Isolagen TherapyTM in Treatment of Interdental Papillary Insufficiency

March 19, 2021 updated by: Castle Creek Biosciences, LLC.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and the treatment effect of Isolagen TherapyTM in subjects with maxillary lesions who were treated in a previous study (IT-G-002, no NCT identification number)

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77063
        • Perio-Health Professionals, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be 18-70 years of age
  • Subject was treated in IT-G-002 (no NCT identification number)
  • Subject has maxillary interproximal recession defects
  • Natural teeth must be present on both sides of each area to be treated
  • Negative pregnancy test and use of acceptable birth control (females of childbearing age)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who participated in other clinical trials within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Interproximal spaces including root grooves or furcations must not be involved
  • Subjects with poor oral hygiene
  • Subjects with a systemic condition, which would preclude periodontal treatment
  • Subjects with acute infectious lesions in the treatment areas
  • Subjects with open interproximal contact at study sites
  • Subjects who must receive prophylactic antibiotics before dental procedures
  • Subjects on chronic antibiotic or steroidal therapy
  • Subjects with interproximal probing depths > 3 mm around study lesions
  • Subjects who smoke
  • Subjects taking medications associated with the development of drug induced gingival hyperplasia
  • Subjects with radiographic evidence of pathology
  • Subjects with tooth mobility exceeding a score of 1
  • Subjects with parafunctional habits and not wearing bite guard
  • Subjects with interproximal spaces associated with teeth without an adequate zone of keratinized tissue
  • Subjects where the etiology of the interproximal papillary recession has not been controlled
  • Subjects who have received a crown or pontic on one or both teeth involved in the interproximal space to be treated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active
  1. Collection of biopsy from palate
  2. Papillary priming procedure
  3. Seven injection treatments to target sites
  4. Performance of study assessments (investigator and subject)
Other Names:
  • LAVIV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Responders Based on the Average Investigator Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatment
A patient was considered a responder in this outcome measure if the average Investigator's GORS score for all treatment areas was greater than 0. On the GORS, a score of -2 (much worsening from baseline) was the worst and +2 (great improvement from baseline) was the best.
Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatment
Number of Responders Based on the Average Patient Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatment
A patient was considered a responder in this outcome measure if the average patient's GORS score for all treatment areas was greater than 0. On the GORS, a score of -2 (much worsening from baseline) was the worst and +2 (great improvement from baseline) was the best.
Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IT-G-003

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Interdental Papillary Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Autologous Human Fibroblasts (azficel-T)

Subscribe