- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00660413
Comparison of Acceleromyography (AMG) and Mechanomyography (MMG) for Establishing Potency of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
April 15, 2008 updated by: Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Comparison of Acceleromyography and Mechanomyography for Establishing Potency of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, A Randomized Controlled Study
The purpose of this study was to compare two methods for neuromuscular monitoring, acceleromyography and mechanomyography for establishing the dose-response relationship and the potency of a neuromuscular blocking agent using rocuronium as an example.
We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference between potencies estimated using acceleromyography and mechanomyography.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
40
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Østerbro
-
Copenhagen, Østerbro, Denmark, 2100
- Rigshospitalet
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I-III
- Ideal weight +/-20%
- Both arms available for neuromuscular monitoring
- Surgery in supine position
- Participated surgery time more than 30 min
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant and breast-feeding women
- Patients with known illness or use of medications known to influence the neuromuscular transmission
- Known significant renal or hepatic dysfunction
- Allergy to medications used in the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: AMG
Acceleromygraphy monitoring
|
Randomization of AMG to dominant or non-dominant arm.
MMG at contralateral arm.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: MMG
Mechanomyography monitoring
|
Randomization of AMG to dominant or non-dominant arm.
MMG at contralateral arm.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
---|
Comparison of ED50 with the two methods
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
---|
Comparison of ED95 with the two methods
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Casper Claudius, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2008
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 15, 2008
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
April 17, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
April 17, 2008
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 15, 2008
Last Verified
April 1, 2008
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- AMG-MMG D-R
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Blockade
-
Hospital Federal de BonsucessoUnknownNeuromuscular Blockade | Magnesium Sulfate | Rocuronium | Deep Neuromuscular BlockadeBrazil
-
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,...CompletedNeuromuscular Blockade | Neuromuscular MonitoringItaly
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselUnknownNeuromuscular Blockade | Neuromuscular MonitoringBelgium
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceNot yet recruitingComparison of the TOFscan and the TetraGraph During Recovery of Neuromuscular Function (DECURAR-EMG)Neuromuscular BlockadeFrance
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity of Pittsburgh; The Cooper Health SystemRecruitingNeuromuscular BlockadeUnited States
-
Leiden University Medical CenterMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedNeuromuscular BlockadeNetherlands
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompleted
-
Poitiers University HospitalEnrolling by invitationNeuromuscular BlockadeFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dinant Godinne...CompletedNeuromuscular BlockadeBelgium
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedNeuromuscular BlockadeKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on TOF-Watch SX (Acceleromyography)
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dinant Godinne...CompletedNeuromuscular BlockadeBelgium
-
NorthShore University HealthSystemUnknownNeuromuscular BlockadeUnited States
-
Christoph CzarnetzkiHôpital du ValaisTerminatedNeuromuscular BlockadeSwitzerland
-
Christoph CzarnetzkiCompletedNeuromuscular BlockadeSwitzerland
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedMuscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedNeuromuscular BlockadeDenmark
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedObservation of Neuromuscular Block
-
Xinmin WuMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedResidual CurarizationChina
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedNeuromuscular BlockadeUnited States
-
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,...CompletedNeuromuscular Blockade | Neuromuscular MonitoringItaly