GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis Versus Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) to Revise AV Grafts in Hemodialysis (REVISE)

October 14, 2014 updated by: W.L.Gore & Associates

GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis Versus Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) to Revise Arteriovenous Grafts at the Venous Anastomosis in Hemodialysis Patients

The objective of the study is to establish efficacy and safety of the GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with PROPATEN Bioactive Surface when used to revise arteriovenous (AV) prosthetic grafts at the venous anastomosis in the maintenance or re-establishment of vascular access for hemodialysis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary effectiveness hypothesis is to demonstrate that the GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with PROPATEN Bioactive Surface will extend the period of target lesion primary patency as compared to PTA.

The primary safety hypothesis is to demonstrate that the proportion of subjects remaining free from major device, procedure, and treatment site-related adverse events through 30 days post-procedure in the GORE® VIABAHN® Device group is not inferior to that of the PTA group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

293

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249
    • California
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93710
      • Inglewood, California, United States, 90301
      • Oceanside, California, United States, 92056
      • Riverside, California, United States, 92501
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92120
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92115
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
    • Georgia
      • Albany, Georgia, United States, 31707-1908
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612-3833
    • Iowa
      • Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50309
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21239
    • Minnesota
      • New Brighton, Minnesota, United States, 55112
      • St. Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55101
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45212
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267-0585
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45406
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29421
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
    • Texas
      • Beaumont, Texas, United States, 77701
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
      • Winchester, Virginia, United States, 22601
    • Washington
      • Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98004
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodialysis patient with a dysfunctional or thrombosed forearm or upper arm prosthetic vascular access graft.
  • The target lesion starts less than or equal to 30 mm from the venous anastomosis.
  • The target lesion has > 50% stenosis as measured per protocol.
  • The patient has a maximum of one secondary stenosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The age of the hemodialysis access graft is less than or equal to 30 days old from the date of the study procedure.
  • The patient has undergone an intervention (surgical or percutaneous) of the vascular access circuit less than or equal to 30 days from the date of the study procedure.
  • The secondary lesion is an occlusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: VIABAHN Treatment Group
Use of GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with PROPATEN Bioactive Surface to revise arteriovenous (AV) prosthetic grafts at the venous anastomosis in the maintenance or re-establishment of vascular access for hemodialysis as compared to Comparator Arm
Deployment of investigational stent graft at the venous anastomosis
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: PTA Treatment Group
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) in arteriovenous (AV) prosthetic grafts at the venous anastomosis in the maintenance or re-establishment of vascular access for hemodialysis as compared to Experimental Arm
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty at the venous anastomosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target Lesion Primary Patency at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval of uninterrupted patency from initial study treatment to the next access thrombosis or intervention performed on the target lesion.

Six-month estimate of target lesion primary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

6 months
Target Lesion Primary Patency at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 Months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval of uninterrupted patency from initial study treatment to the next access thrombosis or intervention performed on the target lesion.

Twelve-month estimate of target lesion primary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

12 Months
Target Lesion Primary Patency at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 Months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval of uninterrupted patency from initial study treatment to the next access thrombosis or intervention performed on the target lesion.

P-Value calculated from 24-month data cohort after study completion.

24 Months
Freedom From Major Device, Procedure and Treatment Site-related Adverse Adverse Events Through 30 Days Post-procedure
Time Frame: 30 days
The primary safety endpoint is freedom from major device, procedure and treatment site-related adverse events through 30 days.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assisted Primary Patency at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to occlusion (thrombosis) of the vascular access circuit.

Six-month estimate of assisted primary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

6 months
Assisted Primary Patency at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to occlusion (thrombosis) of the vascular access circuit.

Twelve-month estimate of assisted primary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

12 months
Assisted Primary Patency at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to occlusion (thrombosis) of the vascular access circuit.

Twenty-four-month estimate of assisted primary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

24 months
Access Secondary Patency at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to abandonment of the vascular access circuit.

Six-month estimate of secondary access patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

6 months
Access Secondary Patency [12 Months] Units Percentage of Subjects
Time Frame: 12 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to abandonment of the vascular access circuit.

Twelve-month estimate of secondary access secondary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

12 months
Access Secondary Patency [24 Months] Units Percentage of Subjects
Time Frame: 24 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to abandonment of the vascular access circuit.

24-month estimate of secondary access secondary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

24 months
Circuit Primary Patency
Time Frame: 6 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to the next access thrombosis or intervention performed within the vascular access circuit.

P-Value calculated from 24-month data cohort. Six-month estimate of circuit primary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

6 months
Circuit Primary Patency [12 Months] Units Percentage of Subjects
Time Frame: 12months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to abandonment of the vascular access circuit.

Twelve-month estimate of secondary access secondary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

12months
Circuit Primary Patency [24 Months] Units Percentage of Subjects
Time Frame: 24 months

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the time interval from initial study treatment to abandonment of the vascular access circuit.

Twelve-month estimate of secondary access secondary patency derived from Kaplan-Meier curve.

24 months
Clinical Success
Time Frame: Following Index Procedure
The resumption of normal dialysis for at least one session following study treatment (Index Procedure).
Following Index Procedure
Anatomic Success
Time Frame: Index Procedure
Less than 30 percent residual stenosis following study treatment (Index Procedure).
Index Procedure
Procedural Success
Time Frame: Following Index Procedure
Participants were considered to have Procedural Success if they achieved both anatomic success and clinical success.
Following Index Procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tom Vesely, MD, Vascular Access Center; Frontenac, MO

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 19, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AVR 06-01
  • G070069 (OTHER: FDA (IDE))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Failure

Clinical Trials on GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with PROPATEN Bioactive Surface

Subscribe