Photographic Library of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Subjects Treated With Infliximab (Study P05047) (PHODYPSO)

July 15, 2015 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Atlas of the Evolution of Psoriasis Lesions Under Remicade® : A Dynamic Standardized Photographic Library of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Subjects Treated With Infliximab

This is a national, multi-center, observational, prospective photographic atlas study in subjects who are treated with infliximab for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in daily clinic according to local country regulations and reimbursement.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects will enter this study using a non-probability sampling method.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

133

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participation to the observational study will be proposed to Dermatology departments by the medical department of the sponsor. Subjects with moderate-to-severe psoriasis initiating infliximab in accordance with the terms of the European label will be asked to participate.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, age >=18 with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
  • Patient for whom the physician has decided to initiate psoriasis treatment with infliximab in accordance with the terms of the European labeling.
  • Patient must demonstrate his/her willingness to participate in the observational study by signing a written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to understand and answer a self administered questionnaire.
  • No specific non-inclusion criteria will be applied to eligible patients.
  • Contradiction and/or Precaution listed in the Summary of Product Characteristics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Infliximab
Subjects with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who are treated with infliximab in daily clinics according to local country regulations and reimbursements.
According to local country regulations.
Other Names:
  • Remicade
  • SCH 215596

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static Photographic Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score as Assessed by Two Dermatologists
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Digital pictures of each participant's whole body were taken at each visit. Static PGA was assessed by two dermatologists on the basis of these pictures at a single point in time. The mean of the two readings from the dermatologists was used. Static PGA score ranged from 0 (no psoriasis) to 5 (extreme psoriasis). The higher the number, the more severe the psoriasis was.
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Dynamic Photographic PGA Score as Assessed by Two Dermatologists
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 6)
The dynamic PGA score resulted from the comparison of two sets of pictures/visits. The dynamic PGA was scored twice, at the middle and at the end of the observation period (comparison between picture sets of Week 0 (Visit 1) and Week 14 (Visit 4) visits and comparison between picture sets of Week 0 (Visit 1) and Week 30 (Visit 6) visits. Dynamic PGA was assessed by two dermatologists and the mean of the two readings was used. Clinical improvement was measured with a 10 centimeter (cm)-visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no improvement) to 10 (disappearance of lesions).
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static PGA Score as Assessed by the Investigator
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Static PGA was assessed at each visit by the investigator. Static PGA score ranged from 0 (no psoriasis) to 5 (extreme psoriasis). The higher the number, the more severe the psoriasis was.
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Dynamic PGA Score as Assessed by the Investigator
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 6)
The dynamic PGA was scored twice, at the middle and at the end of the observation period. Clinical improvement from Baseline (Visit 1) was evaluated with a 10 cm-VAS ranging from 0 (no improvement) to 10 (disappearance of lesions) at the Week 14 (Visit 4) and Week 30 (Visit 6) visits.
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved With Psoriasis
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5),Week 30 (Visit 6)
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5),Week 30 (Visit 6)
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
PASI ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 72 (very marked symptoms) and assessed 3 clinical signs within each area (head, arms, trunk, and legs): erythema (redness), induration (thickness), and desquamation (scaling).
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
The nail was divided with imaginary horizontal and longitudinal lines into quadrants. Each nail was given a score for nail bed psoriasis (0-4) and nail matrix psoriasis (0-4) depending on the presence of any of the features of nail psoriasis in that quadrant. Each nail was evaluated, and the sum of all the nails was the total NAPSI score. The sum of the scores from all nails ranged from 0 (no psoriasis) to 80 (psoriasis present in all 4 quadrants of all 10 nails).
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Static PGA Score as Assessed by the Participant
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Participants assessed their psoriasis at Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), and Week 30 (Visit 6) according to the Static PGA score, which ranged from 0 (no psoriasis) to 5 (extreme psoriasis). The higher the number, the more severe the psoriasis was.
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Dynamic PGA Score as Assessed by the Participant
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 6)
The dynamic PGA was scored twice, at the middle and at the end of the observation period. Clinical improvement from Baseline (Visit 1) was evaluated with a 10 cm-VAS ranging from 0 (no improvement) to 10 (disappearance of lesions) at the Week 14 (Visit 4) and Week 30 (Visit 6) visits.
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
DLQI ranged from 0 (no effect on participant's life) to 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life) and was computed by summing the score (each ranging from 0 to 3) of each of a 10-item questionnaire.
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Number of Participants With Satisfactory Health Status
Time Frame: Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)
Participant's opinion on his/her health status, as assessed by the following question: "Think about all the ways your psoriasis is affecting you, do you consider that your current status is satisfactory? (Yes/No)"
Week 0 (Visit 1), Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 14 (Visit 4), Week 22 (Visit 5), Week 30 (Visit 6)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on Infliximab

Subscribe