Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL)+ Drugs Versus Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) Alone For Secondary Prophylaxis (Secondary)

October 3, 2008 updated by: Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital

Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Plus Propranolol And Isosorbide Mononitrate Versus Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Alone For Secondary Prophylaxis Of Variceal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Both endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and propranolol are valuable methods for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Addition of ISMN to propranolol improves the efficacy of drug therapy. It is hypothesized that a combination of EVL and portal pressure reducing drugs should significantly be better than EVL alone.

Patients and Methods: Patients with history of variceal bleed were randomized to EVL plus drugs (propranolol and ISMN) or EVL alone. EVL was repeated every 3-4 weeks until variceal eradication. Propranolol dose was adjusted to reduce the resting heart rate to 55 bpm. Dose of ISMN was 40 mg/d. Primary end points were rebleed or death. Secondary end points included complications of portal hypertension and the development of serious adverse effects to therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

177

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110002
        • Department of Gastroenterology, G B Pant Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting to G B Pant Hospital, New Delhi, with history of hematemesis and/or melena and proven to have esophageal varices as the bleeding source on upper GI endoscopy were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of undergoing endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST), EVL, or cyanoacrylate injection;
  • A history of surgery for portal hypertension;
  • Coexisting malignancy;
  • Severe cardiopulmonary or renal disease;
  • A history of severe side-effects or contraindications to beta-blockers like bronchial asthma, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, prostatic hypertrophy, arterial hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg), bradycardia (basal heart rate <55 beats per minute), or complete heart block; and
  • Refusal to give consent to participate in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: EVL + Drugs
Patients randomized to the EVL plus drugs therapy received EVL plus beta-blocker (propranolol) and nitrate (ISMN).
Treatment was started with propranolol at a dose of 40 mg twice a day. The heart rate and blood pressure were checked after 12 to 24 hours. The dose of propranolol was increased at increments of 20 to 40 mg per day until the patient achieved a heart rate of 55 bpm, or a maximum dose of 320 mg/day was achieved.ISMN was added at a dose of 10 mg twice a day. The dose was escalated at increments of 10-20 mg/day till a maximum dose of 40 mg/day was reached.
Placebo Comparator: EVL alone
Patients assigned to the EVL group underwent variceal band ligation alone till variceal obliteration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Primary end points of the study were bleeding and death.
Time Frame: During the study period
During the study period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complications, UGI bleeding due to causes not related to PHT, and adverse effects that required the discontinuation of therapy.
Time Frame: During the study period
During the study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2008

Last Verified

October 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Portal Hypertension

Clinical Trials on EVL + Propranolol + Isosorbide 5 mononitrate

3
Subscribe