Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (NEAT-HFpeF)

October 7, 2016 updated by: Adrian Hernandez
A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study to assess effect of isosorbide mononitrate with dose up-titration on activity tolerance as assessed by (hip-worn, tri-axial) accelerometry.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19718
        • Christiana Care Health Services
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University School Of Medicine
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center
      • West Roxbury, Massachusetts, United States, 02132
        • Boston V.A. Healthcare System
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
        • Metro Health System
    • Pennsylvania
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17604
        • Lancaster General Hospital
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Jefferson Medical College
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
        • Temple University Hospital
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania Health System
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake CIty, Utah, United States, 84148
        • V.A. Medical Center
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05401
        • The University of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 50 years
  2. Symptoms of dyspnea (NYHA class II-IV) without evidence of a non-cardiac or ischemic explanation for dyspnea
  3. Ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% as determined on imaging study within 12 months of enrollment with no change in clinical status suggesting potential for deterioration in systolic function
  4. Stable medical therapy for 30 days as defined by:

    • No addition or removal of ACE, Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or aldosterone antagonists
    • No change in dosage of ACE, ARBs, beta-blockers,CCBs or aldosterone antagonists of more than 100%
  5. One of the following within the last 12 months

    • Previous hospitalization for heart failure (HF) with radiographic evidence of pulmonary congestion (pulmonary venous hypertension, vascular congestion, interstitial edema, pleural effusion) or
    • Catheterization documented elevated filling pressures at rest (LVEDP≥15 or PCWP≥20) or with exercise (PCWP≥25) or
    • Elevated NT-proBNP (> 400 pg/ml) or BNP (> 200 pg/ml) or
    • Echo evidence of diastolic dysfunction / elevated filling pressures (at least two) E/A > 1.5 + decrease in E/A of > 0.5 with valsalva Deceleration time ≤ 140 ms Pulmonary vein velocity in systole < diastole (PVs<PVd)sinus rhythm) E/e'≥15 Left atrial enlargement (≥ moderate) Pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 40 mmHg Evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy
    • LV mass/BSA ≥ 96 (♀) or ≥ 116 (♂) g/m2
    • Relative wall thickness ≥ 0.43 (♂ or ♀) [(IVS+PW)/LVEDD]
    • Posterior wall thickness ≥ 0.9 (♀) or 1.0 (♂) cm
  6. No chronic nitrate therapy or infrequent (≤ 1x week) use of intermittent sublingual nitroglycerin within last 3 months
  7. Ambulatory (not wheelchair / scooter / walker / cane dependent)
  8. HF is the primary factor limiting activity as indicated by answering # 2 to the following question:

My ability to be active is most limited by:

  1. Joint, foot, leg, hip or back pain
  2. Shortness of breath and/or fatigue and/or chest pain
  3. Unsteadiness or dizziness
  4. Lifestyle, weather, or I just don't like to be active

9. Body size allows wearing of the accelerometer belt as confirmed by ability to comfortably fasten the test belt provided for the screening process (belt designed to fit persons with BMI 20-40 Kg/m2 but belt may fit some persons outside this range)

10. Willingness to wear the accelerometer belt for the duration of the trial 11. Willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recent (< 3 months) hospitalization for HF
  2. Hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dl
  3. Glomerular filtration rate < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 on most recent clinical laboratories
  4. SBP < 110 mmHg or > 180 mmHg at consent
  5. Diastolic blood pressure < 40 mmHg or > 100 mmHg at consent
  6. Resting HR > 110 bpm at consent
  7. Previous adverse reaction to nitrates necessitating withdrawal of therapy
  8. Chronic therapy with phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (intermittent use of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction is allowable if the patient is willing to hold for the duration of the trial)
  9. Regularly (> 1x per week) swims or does water aerobics
  10. Significant COPD thought to contribute to dyspnea
  11. Ischemia thought to contribute to dyspnea
  12. Documentation of previous EF < 50%
  13. Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months defined by electrocardiographic changes and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g. troponin) in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent)
  14. Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or new biventricular pacing within past 3 months
  15. Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  16. Infiltrative cardiomyopathy (amyloid)
  17. Constrictive pericarditis or tamponade
  18. Active myocarditis
  19. Complex congenital heart disease
  20. Active collagen vascular disease
  21. More than mild aortic or mitral stenosis
  22. Intrinsic (prolapse, rheumatic) valve disease with moderate to severe or severe mitral, tricuspid or aortic regurgitation
  23. Acute or chronic severe liver disease as evidenced by any of the following: encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, INR > 1.7 in the absence of anticoagulation treatment
  24. Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year
  25. Enrollment or planned enrollment in another therapeutic clinical trial in the next 3 months
  26. Inability to comply with planned study procedures
  27. Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Isosorbide Mononitrate
Isosorbide Mononitrate with dose up-titration (30 to 120 mg/day over 4 weeks)

Dispense phase 1 study drug:

Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg ISMN Week 4: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg ISMN

Dispense phase-2 study drug:

Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg ISMN Week 10: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg ISMN

Other Names:
  • Imdur, ISMO, Monoket
Placebo Comparator: Isosorbide Mononitate Placebo
Isosorbide Mononitrate placebo with dose up-titration (30 to 120 mg/day over 4 weeks)

Dispense phase 1 study drug:

Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg Placebo Week 4: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg Placebo

Dispense phase-2 study drug:

Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg Placebo Week 10: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase I)
Time Frame: 5-6 weeks
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
5-6 weeks
Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase II)
Time Frame: 11-12 weeks
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
11-12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase I)
Time Frame: Week 7
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.
Week 7
Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase II)
Time Frame: Week 13
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.
Week 13
Patient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.
Time Frame: Week 13
Self reported participant preference for study period 1 vs. study period 2.
Week 13
Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase I)
Time Frame: Week 7
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.
Week 7
Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase II)
Time Frame: Week 13
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.
Week 13
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase I)
Time Frame: Week 7
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).
Week 7
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase II)
Time Frame: Week 13
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. • The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).Higher values of the overall KCCQ score are considered to be better than lower values.
Week 13
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase I)
Time Frame: Week 7
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo
Week 7
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase II)
Time Frame: Week 13
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo
Week 13
Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase I)
Time Frame: 5-6 weeks
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug
5-6 weeks
Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase II)
Time Frame: 11-12 weeks
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug
11-12 weeks
Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase I)
Time Frame: 3-6 weeks
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
3-6 weeks
Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase II)
Time Frame: 9-12 weeks
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
9-12 weeks
Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase I)
Time Frame: 3-6 weeks
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28
3-6 weeks
Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase II)
Time Frame: 9-12 weeks
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28
9-12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Anstrom, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

After the study results have been published, site-specific participant data will be shared with sites upon request. Sites are expected to follow their specific institutional policies regarding sharing results with their participants.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Isosorbide Mononitrate

3
Subscribe