Evaluation of Patients With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (noCAD)

June 2, 2025 updated by: Jennifer A Tremmel, MD, MS, Stanford University

Evaluation of Patients With Angina in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Patients with angina and non-obstructive CAD are common within clinical practice, but remain a challenge with regard to diagnosis and treatment. When these patients undergo a comprehensive evaluation at the time of invasive coronary angiography, occult coronary abnormalities are frequently found. We hope to learn the overall prevalence and presentation of these occult coronary abnormalities and its long term outcome in this patient population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective registry of patients with chest pain, chest discomfort, breathlessness who do not have a blockage in their heart artery. This condition is known as angina/ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA). The purpose of this registry is to help us understand the prevalence, causes of these conditions, identify effective diagnostic strategy, and long term outcome in this patient population.

Patients will undergo comprehensive invasive evaluation including coronary angiography, intravascular imaging, and physiologic measurements as a standard of care. Details regarding the participant's angiogram, endothelial function testing, microvascular testing, intravascular ultrasound, and myocardial bridge testing, if performed, will be entered into a research database.

Participants may be contacted by email or phone periodically for follow-up information, such as surveys, an update on medical history, and/or a check on their medical status or symptoms. We anticipate gathering these data at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years, and every 5 years thereafter following their enrollment.

The overall objective of this registry study is to identify specific endotypes of ANOCA by invasive evaluation and study long term outcome.

Specific goals include:

  1. Describe the prevalence of the following ANOCA endotypes: endothelial dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic angina, myocardial bridging (MB), and other disorders of coronary physiology, and non-cardiac chest pain;
  2. Characterize the natural history and outcomes of patients with ANOCA and determine variables associated with major adverse cardiovascular events

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Recruiting
        • Stanford University School of Medicine
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Vedant S Pargaonkar, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alan CY Yeung, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult women and men with angina who have been referred for an elective coronary angiogram because of a reasonable clinical suspicion of coronary ischemia.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient referred for elective coronary angiography because of a reasonable clinical suspicion of coronary ischemia.
  2. Presence of angina or an anginal equivalent (including chest, back, shoulder, arm, neck, jaw discomfort, or shortness of breath brought on by physical exertion, emotional stress, or certain times of day/month).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Asymptomatic (such as a pre-op cath)
  2. Status-post heart transplant
  3. Age <18
  4. Renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.5)
  5. Presence of an acute coronary syndrome (STEMI or NSTEMI), Tako-tsubo, an abnormal ejection fraction (EF<55%), cardiogenic shock, or recent VT/VF
  6. Presence of another likely explanation of chest pain, such as pulmonary hypertension or aortic stenosis
  7. History of adverse reaction to any of the medications being used (acetylcholine, nitroglycerin, adenosine, or heparin)
  8. Currently taking vasoactive medication (such as nitroglycerin)
  9. Inability to provide an informed consent, including an inability to speak, read, or understand English, Spanish, Chinese, Farsi, Japanese, Korean, Russian, or Vietnamese
  10. A hearing impairment that won't allow for a typical verbal conversation or a visual impairment that won't allow for reading of the written consent
  11. Participation in another study (with the exception of the Stanford Gene-PAD study)
  12. A potentially vulnerable subject (including minors, pregnant women, economically and educationally disadvantaged, decisionally impaired, and homeless people)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sex Differences in Endothelial Dysfunction, Microvascular Dysfunction, and Diffuse Plaque
Time Frame: Day of procedure (study day one)
This outcome is to measure the prevalence of angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) endotypes
Day of procedure (study day one)
Number of participants with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Time Frame: 15 years
MACE - death, heart attack, revascularization, stroke
15 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Seattle angina questionnaire score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 3 year, every 5 years thereafter
Scores range from 0 - 100, higher score means better outcome
Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 3 year, every 5 years thereafter
Number of patients with cardiovascular rehospitalization
Time Frame: 15 years
15 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer A Tremmel, MD, MS, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2047

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2047

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2009

First Posted (Estimated)

January 15, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemia

Clinical Trials on 30 cc blood draw

Subscribe