Maintenance Vitamin D Therapy for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (2HPT)

December 16, 2015 updated by: Masataka Adachi, Kumamoto University

A Study of Maintenance Therapy After Intravenous Maxacalcitol for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

There are still no established protocols for maintenance therapy with intravenous or oral vitamin D preparations after the iPTH target has been achieved.

Therefore, the present study compared the efficacy of two maintenance therapy protocols, i.e., oral administration of alfacalcidol (an oral vitamin D preparation) at a dose of 1.0 ug/day (higher-dose group) or at a dose of 0.25 ug/day (lower-dose group), in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism who responded to initial maxacalcitol therapy, resulting in the control of iPTH to < 150 pg/mL.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) causes various bone mineral disorders, which have recently been named CKD mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). CKD-MBD presents a spectrum of skeletal abnormalities ranging from high bone turnover state such as osteitis fibrosa, which is seen with SHPT, to states of low bone turnover, which includes osteomalacia and adynamic bone disease. This disease not only increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, but also increases the risk of fracture. Therefore, it is important to correct the serum inorganic phosphorus (Pi), calcium (Ca) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in dialysis patients, to achieve both appropriate bone turnover and to improve mortality.

The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines recommend that the target range of iPTH level for vitamin D therapy should be set at 150-300 pg/mL. In Japan, the mortality risk was significantly lower in the group of patients with iPTH levels < 120 pg/mL than in the standard group set at 180 pg/mL < iPTH < 360 pg/mL, and lowest in the group of patients with 60 pg/mL < iPTH < 120 pg/mL . Based on these findings, Japanese guideline recommend that the target range of iPTH should be set at 60-180 pg/mL .

The efficacies of various oral and intravenous vitamin D preparations for treating SHPT in hemodialysis patients have been reported. and oral or intravenous vitamin D pulse therapy has been clinically applied, especially for patients with severe SHPT.

Up to now, the effectiveness of an oral daily alfacalcidol on SHPT has been confirmed at the dose of 0.25-0.5 μg /day (average 0.364μg /day), 0.5 μg /day, and 1.0 μg /day. The effective dose of OCT has also been verified, and furthermore, it has also been reported that intravenous vitamin D was more effective than oral vitamin D for suppressing PTH secretion. Accordingly, at present intravenous vitamin D therapy is the standard treatment for SHPT, and there are established protocols with regard to dosage and administration. However, no protocols have been established for maintenance therapy using intravenous or oral vitamin D preparations after the control of iPTH target range has been achieved.

Therefore, the present study compared the efficacy of two maintenance therapy protocols for patients with SHPT who responded to initial OCT therapy, resulting in the control of iPTH to <150pg/mL. One was oral administration of alfacalcidol (an oral vitamin D preparation) at a dose of 1.0 μg/day (higher-dose group) and the other was at a dose of 0.25 μg/day (lower-dose group), both of which are clinically effective doses for HD patients with SHPT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kumamoto, Japan, 860-8556
        • Kumamoto University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism (iPTH >200 pg/mL to <500 pg/mL)
  • Serum Ca < 11.0 mg/dL, and serum P < 7.0 mg/dL.
  • At least one year of regular hemodialysis therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any ingredient of maxacalcitol
  • Patients who had received parathyroidectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1.0 μg/day Alfacalcidol
Alfacalcidol 1.0 μg capsule by mouth, every day for 6 months
We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 1.0 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to < 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.
Other Names:
  • One alpha
Other: 0.25 μg/day Alfacalcidol
Alfacalcidol 0.25 μg capsule by mouth, every day for 6 months
We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 0.25 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to < 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.
Other Names:
  • One alpha

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Participants With iPTH Levels Maintained at the Target Levels of 60-180 pg/mL iPTH Level
Time Frame: Participants were followed for 24 weeks
Participants were followed for 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Masataka Adachi, M.D., Ph.D., Department nephrology Kumamoto University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Clinical Trials on 1.0 μg/day Alfacalcidol

Subscribe