Electronic Pharmacotherapy Risk Management (ePRM)

March 21, 2010 updated by: University of Utah

Developing a Utah Pharmacotherapy Risk Management System With an Electronic Surveillance Tool (Utah ePRM)

The purpose of the Utah ePRM (electronic Pharmacotherapy Risk Management) project is to improve quality and safety of medication use while simultaneously controlling costs and detecting fraud and abuse.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The ePRM project has two objectives:

  1. Refine and implement a computerized surveillance and trigger tool to support medication therapy and risk management services. The ePRM tool will be used to (1) identify potential drug-therapy problems, which include quality, safety and cost-related problems; (2) select patients and providers for in-depth clinical reviews and possibly direct intervention (i.e., letter, phone call, Medication Therapy Management Services (MTMS), or Academic Detailing); (3) identify potential fraud and diversion of controlled substances; and (4) track patterns of medication use and evaluate ePRM performance, identify improvements, and direct policy change.
  2. Conduct innovative multi-pronged interventions that are guided by the ePRM trigger tool. Clinical areas chosen for review include diabetes therapy, hypertension, asthma, antipsychotic therapy, pain management (opioid narcotics and anticonvulsants) and anticoagulation/antiplatelet drugs. Interventions in these areas will address potential under and overuse, or patient safety concerns. Clinical pharmacists and physicians will implement five types of inter-related interventions: a) provider level reviews, which includes prescribers' profiling and feedback for outlier prescribers; b) patient level reviews and letters to prescribers for high-risk patients; c) phone consultation and Academic Detailing with outlier prescribers; d) MTMS; and e) detecting and pursuing suspected fraud and abuse cases.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

174000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
        • Multi-clinic site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

all medicaid recipients in the salt lake area

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All medicaid recipients and providers with in the salt lake area

Exclusion Criteria:

  • each participant much be a Medicaid recipient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pediatric Asthmatics
Medicaid beneficiaries ≤21 years of age who meet the HEDIS criteria for persistent asthma
The provider-level intervention includes a targeted review of trigger-flagged beneficiaries' drug utilization history and an information packet sent to providers which includes patient-specific pharmacy and medical claims history, patient specific recommendations, and provider comparative profiling.
The patient intervention arm includes the provider-level intervention mentioned above in addition to Medication Therapy Management Services (MTMS), a program that provides patients one-on-one therapy counseling administered by community pharmacists who have completed an MTMS certificate program.
The process-level intervention includes the provider-level intervention plus in-clinic evidence-based quality improvement workshops with opportunity for CME credit
Antipsychotic Therapy
Medicaid beneficiaries ≥18 years of age and enrolled ≥6 months of the past 12 months with enrollment in at least one of the past 3 months and ≥3 antipsychotic Rx within past 12 months
The provider-level intervention includes a targeted review of trigger-flagged beneficiaries' drug utilization history and an information packet sent to providers which includes patient-specific pharmacy and medical claims history, patient specific recommendations, and provider comparative profiling.
The patient intervention arm includes the provider-level intervention mentioned above in addition to Medication Therapy Management Services (MTMS), a program that provides patients one-on-one therapy counseling administered by community pharmacists who have completed an MTMS certificate program.
The process-level intervention includes the provider-level intervention plus in-clinic evidence-based quality improvement workshops with opportunity for CME credit
Bipolar Therapy
Medicaid beneficiaries ≥18 years of age and enrolled ≥6 months of the past 12 months with enrollment in at least one of the past 3 months and a diagnosis of Bipolar in past 3 years, and ≥ 1 antidepressant Rx in past 6 months, and no mood stabilizer in past 6 months.
The provider-level intervention includes a targeted review of trigger-flagged beneficiaries' drug utilization history and an information packet sent to providers which includes patient-specific pharmacy and medical claims history, patient specific recommendations, and provider comparative profiling.
The patient intervention arm includes the provider-level intervention mentioned above in addition to Medication Therapy Management Services (MTMS), a program that provides patients one-on-one therapy counseling administered by community pharmacists who have completed an MTMS certificate program.
The process-level intervention includes the provider-level intervention plus in-clinic evidence-based quality improvement workshops with opportunity for CME credit
Opioid Therapy

Medicaid beneficiaries ≥18 years and enrolled ≥6 of prior 12 months with enrollment in ≥1 of prior 3 months and ≥1 opioid fill in prior 3 months and none of the following in prior 12 months:

Hospice CPT code or Primary diagnosis of cancer or Oncology CPT code

The process-level intervention includes the provider-level intervention plus in-clinic evidence-based quality improvement workshops with opportunity for CME credit
Fraud and Abuse
Medicaid beneficiaries who filled at least 3 opioid Rx in the last 12 months
Pediatric Antipsychtotic Therapy
Medicaid beneficiaries <18 years of age with at least 3 antipsychotic Rx's in the past year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan R Nebeker, M.D., M.S., VASLCHCS
  • Principal Investigator: Gary Oderda, PharmD, M.P.H., University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 23, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2010

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 24987
  • 7570516-1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on provider feedback

Subscribe