A Study to Assess the Effect of Tocilizumab on Signs and Symptoms in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

June 28, 2017 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

An Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Reduction in Signs and Symptoms During Treatment With Tocilizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

This single arm, open label study will assess the safety and efficacy, with regard to reduction of signs and symptoms,of treatment with tocilizumab in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients will receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. Patients already receiving methotrexate at entry into the study may continue with their treatment together with tocilizumab.The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is <100 individuals.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Manila, Philippines, 1000
        • Manila Doctors Hospital; Rheumatology Section
      • Manila, Philippines, 1003
        • Jose Reyes Memorial Medical Center
      • Muntinlupa, Philippines, 1770
        • Alabang Medical Center
      • San Fernando, Philippines, 2000
        • Our Lady of Mount Carmel Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients,>=18 years of age;
  • rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed >8 weeks and <4 years prior to baseline;
  • naive to, or not responding well to, methotrexate;
  • swollen joint count >=8 (66 joint count) and tender joint count>=8 (68 joint count) at screening and baseline.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis;
  • patients with functional class IV rheumatoid arthritis;
  • history of, or current, inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis, or other systemic autoimmune disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Percent (%) Improvement (ACR20 Response) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at each visit.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50 Response) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
ACR50 response: ≥50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (VAS), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a HAQ, and 5) ESR at each visit.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70 Response) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
ACR70 response: ≥70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (VAS), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a HAQ, and 5) ESR at each visit.
Week 24
HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline and Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
HAQ-DI is a participant-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To calculate HAQ-DI the participant must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Baseline and Week 24
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Baseline and Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participants response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the health status.
Baseline and Week 24
Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Baseline and Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤)3.2 equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Disease Remission at Week 24 Assessed Using DAS28-ESR
Time Frame: Week 24
DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 <2.6=remission.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity at Week 24 Assessed Using DAS28-ESR
Time Frame: Week 24
DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 >2.6 and <3.2=low disease activity.
Week 24
Time to Onset of ACR20/50/70 Response
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Time to onset of ACR 20/50/70 response was calculated as the number of weeks from the administration of the first dose of study drug until the date of first achievement of ACR 20/50/70 per criteria.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 31, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

Subscribe