Efficacy of Topical Azelaic Acid 15% Gel Plus Anti-inflammatory Dose Doxycycline or Metronidazole Gel 1% Plus Anti-inflammatory Dose Doxycycline in Moderate Papulopustular Rosacea

March 30, 2020 updated by: LEO Pharma

An Exploratory, Multicenter, Investigator-blinded, Active-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Topical Azelaic Acid (AzA)15% Gel Twice Daily or Metronidazole Topical Gel 1% Once Daily, Plus Anti-inflammatory Dose Doxycycline (40mg) Once Daily in Subjects With Moderate Papulopustular Rosacea

Subjects with moderate papulopustular rosacea will be treated either with azelaic acid 15% gel topically plus an anti-inflammatory dose of doxycyline (40mg) daily or with metronidazole 1% gel topically once daily plus an anti-inflammatory dose of doxycycline (40mg) over at total of twelve weeks to determine the rapidity of improvement, and the length of time to reach 25%, 50% and 75% clearing compared to baseline.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The change in inflammatory lesion count will be assessed at each post-baseline visit by an analysis of variance model (ANOVA) with factors treatment and center, but not including treatment-by-center interaction.

Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of papulopustular rosacea (static score): 0 - Clear (Virtually no rosacea ie, no papules and/or pustules; no or residual erythema; no or mild to moderate degree of telangiectasia may be present); 1 - Minimal (Rare papules and/or pustules; residual to mild erythema; mild to moderate degree of telangiectasia may be present); 2 - Mild (Few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; mild to moderate degree of telangiectasia may be present); 3 - Mild to moderate (Distinct number of papules and/or pustules; mild to moderate erythema; mild to moderate degree of telangiectasia may be present); 4 - Moderate (Pronounced number of papules and/or pustules; moderate erythema; mild to moderate degree of telangiectasia may be present); 5 - Moderate to severe (Many papules and/or pustules, occasionally with large inflamed lesions; moderate erythema; moderate degree of telangiectasia may be present); 6 - Severe (Numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate or severe erythema; moderate or severe degree of telangiectasia may be present).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

207

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80209
    • Florida
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114-2517
    • Michigan
      • Warren, Michigan, United States, 48088
    • Minnesota
      • Fridley, Minnesota, United States, 55432
    • Nevada
      • Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89052
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11790
    • Ohio
      • Mason, Ohio, United States, 45040
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97223
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77056
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Moderate papulopustular rosacea (IGA>4) with a minimum of 10 and no more than 50 inflammatory lesions and persistent erythema with or without telangiectasia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sensitivity to any of the treatments used
  • Co-existing conditions that would unfavorably influence the course of the disease
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Severe rosacea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Azelaic acid (Finacea, BAY39-6251) plus Doxycycline (Oracea)
Participants received topical azelaic acid gel 15% twice daily and doxycycline 40 mg once daily for 12 weeks
Participants received topical azelaic acid gel 15% twice daily for 12 weeks
Participants received systemic doxycycline 40 mg once daily for 12 week
Active Comparator: Metronidazole (Metrogel) plus Doxycycline (Oracea)
Participants received topical metronidazole 1% gel once daily and doxycycline 40 mg once daily for 12 weeks
Participants received systemic doxycycline 40 mg once daily for 12 week
Participants received topical metronidazole 1% gel once daily for 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count (Sum of Papules and Pustules) at Week 2 (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2
NOTE: Negative mean values represent an improvement (decrease of inflammatory lesions)
Baseline and Week 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Inflammatory Lesions at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Nominal Change From Baseline in IL Count at Weeks 4, 6, 8 and 12 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 6, 8 and 12
NOTE: Negative mean values represent an improvement (decrease of inflammatory lesions)
Baseline and Week 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in IL Count at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
NOTE: Negative mean values represent an improvement (decrease of inflammatory lesions)
Baseline and Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 25%, 50%, or 75% Improvement in Facial IL Counts From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3 - Mild to moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe (refer to Detailed Description field in Protocol section for more information) / Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal (0 or 1).
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With IGA Based Patient Response at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3 - Mild to moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe (refer to Detailed Description field in Protocol section for more information) / Patient response is defined as an IGA score of clear, minimal, or mild (0, 1, or 2)
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Respective Disease Severity Measured by IGA Scores at Week 2
Time Frame: At Week 2
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3 - Mild to moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe (refer to Detailed Description field in Protocol section for more information).
At Week 2
Percentage of Participants With Respective Disease Severity Measured by IGA Scores at Week 4
Time Frame: At Week 4
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3 - Mild to moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe (refer to Detailed Description field in Protocol section for more information).
At Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Respective Disease Severity Measured by IGA Scores at Week 6
Time Frame: At Week 6
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3 - Mild to moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe (refer to Detailed Description field in Protocol section for more information).
At Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Respective Disease Severity Measured by IGA Scores at Week 8
Time Frame: At Week 8
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3 - Mild to moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe (refer to Detailed Description field in Protocol section for more information).
At Week 8
Percentage of Participants With Respective Disease Severity Measured by IGA Scores at Week 12
Time Frame: At Week 12
IGA categories: 0 - Clear; 1 - Minimal; 2 - Mild; 3 - Mild to moderate; 4 - Moderate; 5 - Moderate to severe; 6 - Severe (refer to Detailed Description field in Protocol section for more information).
At Week 12
Investigator Rating of Overall Improvement at End of Study (Week 12)
Time Frame: Week 12
Week 12
Patient Rating of Overall Improvement at End of Study (Week 12)
Time Frame: Week 12
Week 12
Patient Opinion of Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Study (Week 12)
Time Frame: Week 12
Week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient Opinion of Local Tolerability
Time Frame: Week 12
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14366
  • 1402604 (Other Identifier: Intendis GmbH)
  • 256-0024 (Other Identifier: Intendis GmbH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Papulopustular Rosacea

Clinical Trials on Azelaic acid (Finacea, BAY39-6251)

Subscribe