The Automated Fluid Shunt (AFS)in Chronic Congestive Heart Failure

December 16, 2011 updated by: NovaShunt AG
A 28-week, feasibility study to investigate the safety and efficiency of the Automatic Fluid Shunt in patients with chronic congestive heart failure, ascites and diuretic resistance.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Göteborg, Sweden, 41345
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female or male patients ≥ 18 years of age
  • A clinical diagnosis of chronic congestive heart failure > 6 months
  • At least one episode of documented ADHF during the previous 6 months
  • NYHA functional class III-IV
  • Circulating levels of NT-proBNP ≥ 800 ng/L.
  • Stable, optimized therapy for heart failure for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Echocardiography performed within 3 months
  • Detectable ascites by ultrasound and/or computed tomography
  • Diuretic resistance defined as a daily dose of furosemide > 80 mg, torsemide > 40 mg or bumetanide > 2 mg
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Present or recurring systemic or local infection, such as peritonitis, urinary tract infection, or abdominal skin infection.
  • Ongoing malignant disease with adverse prognosis
  • Evidence of firmly loculated peritoneal effusion.
  • Obstructive uropathy
  • Severely reduced renal function (S-Creatinine 300 mol/l) or end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis
  • Severe liver disease (ASAT and/or ALAT and/or total bilirubin three times upper limit of normal range laboratory values)
  • Pregnancy
  • Requirement for intravenous inotropes
  • Acute coronary syndrome or any condition requiring emergency treatment
  • Heart disease requiring surgical intervention during the course of the study
  • Any other clinically significant disease that could be adversely affected by study participation judged by the Investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patient condition pre-implant
Fully implantable peritoneal catheter, bladder catheter, and pump
Other Names:
  • AFS System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To evaluate safety of the Automated Fluid Shunt device during a 28-week follow-up and to evaluate its efficacy by measuring change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 16 weeks, in patients with chronic congestive heart failure, ascites and diuretic resistance.
Time Frame: 16 and 28 weeks
16 and 28 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine the effect of AFS-treatment on functional capacity (NYHA class and 6-min. walking distance) compared from baseline to 16 and 28 weeks
Time Frame: 16 and 28 weeks
16 and 28 weeks
To determine change in LV volumes and LVEF (echocardiography) compared from baseline to 16 and 28 weeks
Time Frame: 16 and 28 weeks
16 and 28 weeks
To determine change in ascites, hydrothorax and leg edema (based on CT evaluation) compared from baseline to 16 and 28 weeks
Time Frame: 16 and 28 weeks
16 and 28 weeks
To determine change in renal function (GFR) compared from baseline to 16 and 28 weeks
Time Frame: 16 and 28 weeks
16 and 28 weeks
To determine change in quality of life based on Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) compared from baseline to 4, 12 and 28 weeks
Time Frame: baseline to 4, 12 and 28 week
baseline to 4, 12 and 28 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristjan Karason, MD, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2011

Last Verified

December 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2008-CHF-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ascites

Clinical Trials on Automatic Fluid Shunt System

Subscribe