Safety and Efficacy of Patient Controlled Analgesia in the Emergency Department

December 26, 2019 updated by: Albert Einstein College of Medicine
The aims of this study are to assess efficacy and safety of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) when applied to the Emergency Department setting and to compare the efficacy and safety of two PCA dosing regimens.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The safety, efficacy, and dosing of PCA will be assessed in a randomized trial with three treatment arms:

  1. PCA with 1.0 mg morphine demand dosing every 6 minutes,
  2. PCA with 1.5 mg demand dosing every 6 minutes and
  3. a non-PCA comparison group.

All patients will receive a loading dose of 0.1 mg/kg morphine. All patients can receive additional analgesics as needed, at the discretion of the provider.

We hypothesize that morphine supplied via PCA will provide superior analgesia without a greater incidence of adverse events when compared to non-PCA pain management; and that PCA demand dosing of 1.5 mg will be superior to 1.0 mg without more adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

211

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Jacobi Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting to the ED with a chief complaint of abdominal pain of less than or equal to 7 days duration
  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • Patient deemed by the ED attending physician to require IV opioid analgesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of prescription or non-prescription opioids
  • Long-term use of opioids, chronic pain syndrome
  • Clinician suspicion of opioid dependence/abuse
  • Clinical suspicion of intoxication
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of sleep apnea, oxygen saturation < 97%
  • Systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg
  • Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, phenothiazines, or tricyclic antidepressants
  • History of renal insufficiency/renal failure
  • Prior allergic reaction to morphine
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Previous entry of patient into study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient-controlled analgesia 1 mg demand dose
0.1 mg/kg morphine loading dose plus PCA with 1.0 mg morphine demand dosing every 6 minutes
Intravenous morphine delivered via Curlin painsmart PCA device
Other Names:
  • PCA
Intravenous morphine
Experimental: Patient-controlled analgesia 1.5 mg demand dose
0.1 mg/kg morphine loading dose plus PCA with 1.5 mg morphine demand dosing every 6 minutes
Intravenous morphine delivered via Curlin painsmart PCA device
Other Names:
  • PCA
Intravenous morphine
Active Comparator: Non-Patient-controlled analgesia comparison group
0.1 mg/kg morphine loading dose plus additional analgesia as needed
Intravenous morphine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Term Efficacy: Change in Pain Intensity as Assessed by Patient Self Report on Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 minutes post treatment
Participants will complete a survey in which they rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst imaginable pain, higher scores indicate worse pain. Change is measured by subtracting the 30 minute NRS score from the Baseline NRS score, thus higher numbers indicate greater decrease in pain, negative numbers indicate increase in pain from baseline to 30 minutes post-baseline.
Baseline and 30 minutes post treatment
Participants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 Minutes
Time Frame: 30 minutes post treatment
Pain Intensity measured on Likert Scale. Participants self report pain level according to the scale by selecting from No relief, Slight relief, Moderate relief, A lot of relief, and Complete relief)
30 minutes post treatment
Long Term Efficacy: Total Analgesia Provided Over 2 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120 post-treatment

Participants will complete a survey in which they rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst imaginable pain, higher scores indicate worse pain

Total analgesia is measured by a summary of change in pain that varies from 0 - no change to

Baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120 post-treatment
Long Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 Minutes
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Participants aksed to and give range
120 minutes
Safety: Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 2 hours
Adverse Events defined as: oxygen saturation < 92%; respiratory rate <10 breaths/min; systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg)
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for Supplementary Analgesia
Time Frame: 2 hours post treatment
count of participants who needed or did not needed additional analgesia
2 hours post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adrienne J Birnbaum, MD, MS, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Polly E Bijur, PhD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Patient-controlled analgesia

Subscribe