A Study of Degarelix in Patients With Prostate Cancer

October 21, 2016 updated by: Ferring Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Degarelix Given Intermittently vs Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Lupron or Degarelix in Patients With Prostate Cancer With Prior Treatment Failure After Localized Treatment

The purpose of this study was to see if giving Degarelix every month for 7 months then stop treatment for 7 months (intermittent therapy) would show a reduction of negative effects of androgen deprivation therapy by increasing the quality of life while keeping prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels suppressed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This was an open-label, randomized, parallel-arm, multicenter study to determine if degarelix intermittent therapy was non-inferior to continuous androgen deprivation therapy (combination of treatment groups receiving continuous degarelix and leuprolide therapy, respectively) in maintaining PSA levels at ≤ 4.0 ng/mL at 14 months.

The study consisted of two phases, Phase A and B. During Phase A, patients in the degarelix intermittent and degarelix continuous arms received 7 months of therapy with degarelix one-month depot formulation and patients in the leuprolide continuous arm received leuprolide one-month depot injection (7.5 mg) followed by two 3-month depot (22.5 mg) injections. After 7 months of treatment, patients with a PSA ≤2 ng/mL continued into Phase B.

During Phase B, patients in the degarelix intermittent arm had a 7-month off-treatment period. Patients randomized to the degarelix continuous arm and the leuprolide continuous arm continued to receive degarelix or leuprolide depot as in Phase A for the remainder of the 14 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

409

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Alexander City, Alabama, United States
        • Alabama Clinical Research, Inc
      • Homewood, Alabama, United States
        • Urology Center of Alabama, PC
    • California
      • Anaheim, California, United States
        • Advanced Urology Medical Center
      • Atherton, California, United States
        • Peninsula Urology Medical Center
      • Fresno, California, United States
        • Urology Associates of Central California
      • Laguna Hills, California, United States
        • South Orange County Medical Research Center
      • Long Beach, California, United States
        • Atlantic Urology Medical Group
      • San Bernardino, California, United States
        • San Bernardino Urological Associates
      • San Diego, California, United States
        • San Diego Uro-Research
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States
        • Santa Barbara Clinical Research
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States
        • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
        • The Urology Center of Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States
        • Urology Associates Research
    • Connecticut
      • Middlebury, Connecticut, United States
        • Connecticut Clinical Research Center
      • New Britain, Connecticut, United States
        • Grove Hill Medical Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
        • Walter Reed Army Hospital Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States
        • South Florida Medical Research
      • Celebration, Florida, United States
        • Urology Health Solutions, Inc
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States
        • Florida Urology Physicians
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States
        • University of Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States
        • Winter Park Urology Associates
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States
        • Southeastern Urology Center, PA
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
        • Tampa Bay Urology
      • Trinity, Florida, United States
        • Advanced Research Institute, Inc
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States
        • Urology Enterprises
    • Illinois
      • Melrose Park, Illinois, United States
        • Midwest Urology/RMD Clinical Research Institute
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States
        • Deaconess Clinic Inc
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
        • Northeast Indiana Research
      • Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States
        • Metropolitan Urology, PSC
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
        • Regional Urology, Lic
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
        • Chesapeake Urology Associates
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
        • Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
      • Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States
        • Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
      • Greenbelt, Maryland, United States
        • Myron Murdock M.D. LLC
      • Towson, Maryland, United States
        • Chesapeake Urology Associates, PA
    • New Jersey
      • Englewood, New Jersey, United States
        • Urology Associates of Englewood
      • Hamilton, New Jersey, United States
        • Hamilton Urology PA
      • Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States
        • Lawrenceville Urology
      • Perth Amboy, New Jersey, United States
        • Nationsmed Clinical Research
      • Voorhees, New Jersey, United States
        • Center for Urologic Care
      • Westampton, New Jersey, United States
        • Delaware Valley Urology LLC
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States
        • The Urological Institute of NE NY, CCP
      • Bay Shore, New York, United States
        • Medical & Clinical Research Associates
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
        • Brooklyn Heights Urology Associates, P.C.
      • New York, New York, United States
        • University Urology Associates
      • Poughkeepsie, New York, United States
        • Hudson Valley Urology P.C.
    • North Carolina
      • Concord, North Carolina, United States
        • Northeast Urology Research
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
        • Alliance Urology Specialists
    • Pennsylvania
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Urological Association of Lancaster
      • State College, Pennsylvania, United States
        • State College Urologic Association
    • South Carolina
      • Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States
        • Carolina Urologic Research Center
      • West Columbia, South Carolina, United States
        • Lexington Urological Associates, PA
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
        • Urology Associates
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Lackland Air Force base
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States
        • Urology of Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States
        • Virginia Urology Center
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States
        • Virginal Urology
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States
        • Seattle Urology Research Center
      • Spokane, Washington, United States
        • Roger D. Fincher, PS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older.
  • Raising PSA after prior treatment failure of localized prostate cancer.
  • Has a histological confirmed non-metastatic cancer of the prostate (Gleason graded) based on the most current biopsy.
  • Has a screening testosterone within normal range (≥1.5 ng/mL).
  • Has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of ≤2.
  • Bone scan or CT scan report documenting no evidence of metastasis to the bone or internal organs.
  • Life expectancy of at least 15 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taken hormone therapy in the last 6 months prior to entering this study.
  • Being treated with 5-alpha reductase inhibitor at time of enrolment and remained on a stable dose throughout the trial.
  • Has a history of severe uncontrolled asthma, anaphylactic reactions, or severe urticaria and/or angioedema.
  • Has hypersensitivity towards any component of the study drug.
  • Has a previous history or presence of another malignancy other than prostate cancer or treated squamous/basal cell carcinoma of the skin within the last five years.
  • Has abnormal laboratory results which in the judgement of the Investigator would affect the patient's health or the outcome of the trial.
  • Has a clinically significant medical condition (other than prostate cancer) including but not limited to; renal, haematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, cardiac, neurological or psychiatric disease and alcohol or drug abuse or any other condition which may affect the patient's health or the outcome of the trial as judged by the Investigator.
  • Has an intellectual incapacity or language barriers precluding adequate understanding or co-operation.
  • Has received an investigational drug within the last 28 days before the Screening visit or longer if considered to possibly influence the outcome of the current trial.
  • Has received ketoconazole or diflucan in the last 28 days preceding the Screening Visit.
  • Has previously participated in any Degarelix trial.
  • Is part of an ongoing trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DI (Degarelix Intermittent)

Patients in this arm received degarelix with a starting dose of 240 mg at a concentration of 40 mg/mL on Day 0 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) into the anterior abdominal wall via two equivalent injections of 120 mg (3 mL) each.

Six maintenance doses of degarelix 80 mg per month at a concentration of 20 mg/mL (4 mL) at Days 28 to 168 were administered.

During Phase B of the trial, If a patient had Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≥2 ng/mL at any visit, additional doses of degarelix 240 mg followed by 80 mg maintenance dose(s) were administered.

Degarelix treatment provided for first seven months (one starting dose and six maintenance doses) followed by no treatment for next seven months period.
Degarelix treatment provided for complete study period (one starting dose and 13 maintenance doses).
Experimental: DC (Degarelix Continuous)

Patients in this arm received degarelix with a starting dose of 240 mg at a concentration of 40 mg/mL administered on Day 0 (Visit 1) s.c. into the anterior abdominal wall via two equivalent injections of 120 mg (3 mL) each.

Thirteen maintenance doses of degarelix 80 mg per month at a concentration of 20 mg/mL (4 mL) at Days 28 to 364, administered s.c. into the anterior abdominal wall

Degarelix treatment provided for first seven months (one starting dose and six maintenance doses) followed by no treatment for next seven months period.
Degarelix treatment provided for complete study period (one starting dose and 13 maintenance doses).
Active Comparator: LC (Leuprolide Continuous)

Patients in this arm received leuprolide 7.5 mg one-month depot injection on Day 0, administered intramuscular (i.m.) into a large muscle, as per manufacturer's labeling directions.

One injection of 22.5 mg leuprolide 3-month depot was administered i.m. as per manufacturer's labeling directions at Day 28 and every 3 months afterwards for 4 additional doses (i.e at Days 112, 196, 280, and 364, respectively).

On Investigator's discretion, patients in the arm could take bicalutamide (Casodex®) for a maximum of 28 days to alleviate increased signs and symptoms due to initial upsurge in testosterone levels.

Leuprolide treatment for complete study period (one starting dose and 5 maintenance doses of 3-month depot each)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With Serum PSA Levels ≤4.0 ng/mL
Time Frame: At 14 month
Percentage of patients with serum PSA levels ≤4.0 ng/mL at 14 month was presented.
At 14 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute Change From Baseline in Serum PSA Levels
Time Frame: Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.
Absolute change from Baseline in serum PSA levels during the study period was measured.
Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum PSA Levels
Time Frame: Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.
Percent change from Baseline in serum PSA levels during the study period was measured.
Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) : Physical Well-being
Time Frame: During 14 months

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.

Physical well-being consist of 7 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the physical well-being sub scale ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores represent better QoL.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Emotional Well-being
Time Frame: During 14 months

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.

Emotional well-being consist of 6 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the emotional well-being sub scale ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores represent better QoL.Higher scores represent better QoL.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Social Well-being
Time Frame: During 14 months

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.

Social well-being consist of 7 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the social well-being sub scale ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores represent better QoL.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Functional Well-being
Time Frame: During 14 months

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.

Functional well-being consist of 7 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the functional well-being sub scale ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores represent better QoL.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Additional Concerns
Time Frame: During 14 months

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.

Additional concerns consist of 12 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the additional concerns ranges from 0 to 48. Higher scores represent better QoL.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P: Total FACT-P Score
Time Frame: During 14 months
The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score. Total FACT-P scores ranges from 0 to 156. Higher scores represent better QoL.
During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the Sexual Function Index (SFI): Sexual Drive
Time Frame: During 14 months

The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.

Sexual drive domain consist of 2 questions and are scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). Total score for the sexual drive domain ranges from 0 to 8. A higher scores represent better sexual function.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Erection
Time Frame: During 14 months

The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.

Erection domain consist of 3 questions and are scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). Total score for the erection domain ranges from 0 to 12. A higher scores represent better sexual function.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Ejaculation
Time Frame: During 14 months

The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.

Ejaculation domain consist of 2 questions and are scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). Total score for the ejaculation domain ranges from 0 to 8. A higher scores represent better sexual function.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Problem Assessment
Time Frame: During 14 months

The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.

Problem assessment domain consist of 2 questions and are scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). Total score for the problem assessment domain ranges from 0 to 8. A higher scores represent better sexual function.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Overall Satisfaction With Sex Life
Time Frame: During 14 months

The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.

Overall satisfaction domain consist of single question and is scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). A higher score represent better sexual function.

During 14 months
Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Total SFI Score
Time Frame: During 14 months
The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function. Total SFI score ranges from 0 to 44. A higher scores represent better sexual function.
During 14 months
Percentage of Subjects With a Serum PSA Level ≤4.0 ng/mL
Time Frame: At 14 months
Percentage of Subjects With a Serum PSA Level ≤4.0 ng/mL was measured during the study period.
At 14 months
Time to Return to Testosterone >0.5 ng/mL Level in the DI Treatment Group
Time Frame: During Phase B
The time to testosterone >0.5 ng/mL level in the DI group was counted from the start of Phase B at Day 196 (i.e. 28 days after last injection of degarelix)
During Phase B
Time to Return to Normal Range (≥1.5 ng/mL) or Baseline Testosterone Level
Time Frame: During Phase B
The time to return to normal range (≥1.5 ng/mL) or Baseline testosterone level in the DI group was counted from the start of Phase B at Day 196 (i.e. 28 days after last injection of degarelix).
During Phase B
Absolute Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels
Time Frame: Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels was measured.
Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels
Time Frame: Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.
Percent change from Baseline in serum testosterone levels was measured.
Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Degarelix

3
Subscribe