Low Level Laser Light Therapy and Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain

April 2, 2014 updated by: Erchonia Corporation

Study of the Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on the Reduction of Chronic Pain Associated With Neck and Shoulder Pain of Musculoskeletal Origin.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the application of low level laser light therapy to the neck and shoulder region is effective in reducing chronic neck and shoulder pain of musculoskeletal origin.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic neck and shoulder pain arising from osteoarthritis, chronic muscle spasms or thoracic or cervical spine sprain strain can be seriously debilitating. Currently available treatment options such as pain relief medication, ice pack, massage, physical therapy and chiropractic are typically of limited effectiveness. More permanent options such as surgery are invasive with long recovery periods and side-effects and complications of their own. Low level laser light therapy, with its proven anti-inflammatory ability, offers a simple non-invasive option for the reduction of chronic neck and shoulder pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Location of pain is on the right and/or left side of the neck and/or shoulder and/or the back of the neck.
  • Etiology of pain is osteoarthritis/Degenerative Joint Disorder (DJD); chronic muscle spasms or cervical and thoracic spine sprain strain, determined according to subject medical history, medication use history, previous records review, physical examination of the cervical spine and shoulder.
  • Stage of injury is chronic, having prevailed for longer than 30 days.
  • Degree of Pain self-rating of 50 or greater on the 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
  • 18-65 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stage of injury is acute, having prevailed for less than 30 days.
  • Known herniated disc injury.
  • Any other disease or condition that may cause or contribute to the chronic pain condition.
  • Presence of infection or open wound at the treatment areas.
  • Use of steroids or narcotics.
  • Use of over-the-counter (OTC) medication for the relief of pain within the 24-hour period prior to participating in the treatment phase of the study, or prescription medication for the relief of pain within the 48-hour period prior to participating in the treatment phase of the study.
  • pregnant or lactating.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo laser
inactive laser light
Inactive laser light
Active Comparator: Erchonia PL2000
The Erchonia PL2000 Laser emits 1 milliWatt (mW) of red (635nm wavelength) light via an electric diode energy source. It is a hand-held device that uses rechargeable batteries or a separate power adapter.
The Erchonia PL2000 Laser emits 1 mW of red (635nm wavelength) light via an electric diode energy source. It is a hand-held device that uses rechargeable batteries or a separate power adapter.
Other Names:
  • Erchonia PL5000
  • Erchonia EVRL Laser

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants Whose Self-reported Pain Rating in the Neck and Shoulder Area on the 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Decreased by 30% or More From Baseline to One Day After Study Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and one day
Participants self-rated the degree of pain experienced in the neck-shoulder region on the 0-100 standardized Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and one day post-treatment. The VAS is a 100mm long horizontal scale ranging from '0: no pain at all' on one end to '100: worst pain imaginable' on the other end. The participant marked the point along the scale that best showed the pain level they experienced in the neck-shoulder area at each point in time. The higher the number marked, the greater the pain level.
baseline and one day
Change in Self-reported Pain Rating in the Neck and Shoulder Area on the 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS)From Baseline to One Day Post-treatment
Time Frame: baseline and one day
Participants self-rated the degree of pain experienced in the neck-shoulder region on the 0-100 standardized Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and one day post-treatment. The VAS is a 100mm long horizontal scale ranging from '0: no pain at all' on one end to '100: worst pain imaginable' on the other end. The participant marked the point along the scale that best showed the pain level they experienced in the neck-shoulder area at that point in time. The higher the number marked, the greater the pain level.
baseline and one day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Range of Motion of the Neck and Shoulders
Time Frame: one day
one day
Muscle Trigger Points of the Cervical Spine
Time Frame: one day
one day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregory C Roche, DO
  • Principal Investigator: Douglas D Dedo, MD
  • Principal Investigator: Edward B Lack, MD

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2001

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2001

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo laser

Subscribe