Comparing Two Sets of Bladder-Filling Instructions in Treating Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy For Prostate Cancer. ICORG 05-04

December 30, 2014 updated by: Cancer Trials Ireland

A Randomised Trial Comparing The Bladder Volume Consistency Achieved With Two Bladder-Filling Protocols in Prostate Conformal Radiotherapy

RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. Having a full bladder may improve the effectiveness of radiation therapy to the bladder. It is not yet known which set of bladder-filling instructions is more effective in helping patients keep their bladder full during radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is comparing two sets of bladder-filling instructions in treating patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiation therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To compare the consistency in bladder volumes in patients with prostate cancer undergoing conformal radiotherapy, when randomized to one of two sets of bladder-filling instructions.

Secondary

  • To compare the incidence of acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients treated with these methods.
  • To determine patient satisfaction with the bladder-filling instructions.
  • To determine satisfaction of bladder-filling protocols amongst radiation therapists and doctors.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients empty their bladders and consume 6 cups of water 30 minutes before undergoing radiotherapy. Patients also undergo bladder volume measurements using a bladder volume instrument (BVI) periodically during treatment.
  • Arm II: Patients empty their bladders and consume 3 cups of water 30 minutes before undergoing radiotherapy. Patients also undergo bladder volume measurements using a BVI periodically during treatment.

In both arms, patients follow their bladder filling instructions and then undergo conformal radiation therapy daily for about 8 weeks.

Patients' perception of symptoms, quality of life, and urinary symptoms are assessed periodically by the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS). Patients' satisfaction with the bladder-filling instructions (i.e., ability to comply with the bladder-filling protocol, the number of incidents of wetting accidents, number of incidents of having to repeat the water drinking on the same day due to machine breakdown or the patient's inability to retain the full bladder for the required amount of time, and the level of frustration) is assessed periodically by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Staff satisfaction with bladder-filling interventions (i.e., patient compliance with the protocols, acceptance of bladder dose-volume histograms [DVHs], need for re-scan with a fuller bladder, amount of disruption to the therapist's work schedule, number of incidents of wetting accidents, number of incidents of having to repeat the water drinking on the same day due to machine breakdown or the patient's inability to retain the full bladder for the required amount of time, and the level of satisfaction or frustration) is assessed periodically.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 4 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

183

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dublin, Ireland, 6
        • Saint Luke's Radiation Oncology Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • Undergoing a radical course of radiotherapy

    • Planned treatment in the supine position

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Karnofsky performance status 60-100%
  • No history of urinary incontinence or urinary catheterization
  • No evidence of any other significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial or if it is felt by the research/medical team that the patient may not be able to comply with the protocol
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No previous surgery for urinary conditions, except transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
  • Prior transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) allowed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm I
Patients empty their bladders and consume 6 cups of water 30 minutes before undergoing radiotherapy. Patients also undergo bladder volume measurements using a bladder volume instrument (BVI) periodically during treatment.
Patients empty their bladders and consume 6 cups or 3 cups of water 30 minutes before undergoing radiotherapy.
Experimental: Arm II
Patients empty their bladders and consume 3 cups of water 30 minutes before undergoing radiotherapy. Patients also undergo bladder volume measurements using a BVI periodically during treatment.
Patients empty their bladders and consume 6 cups or 3 cups of water 30 minutes before undergoing radiotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Consistency of bladder volumes
Time Frame: 2011
2011

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity
Time Frame: 4 years
4 years
Patient satisfaction with bladder-filling instructions
Time Frame: 2011
2011
Staff satisfaction of bladder-filling protocols
Time Frame: 2011
2011

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Thirion, MD, Saint Luke's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: John Gerard Armstrong, MD, MB, MRCPI, Saint Luke's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on pre-procedural preparation

Subscribe