The Effect of Neutral Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Solution With Minimal Glucose-Degradation-Product (GDP) on Fluid Status and Body Composition

September 4, 2014 updated by: Cheuk-Chun SZETO, Chinese University of Hong Kong

The Effect of Neutral Peritoneal Dialysis Solution With Minimal Glucose-Degradation-Product on the Fluid Status and Body Composition - A Randomized Control Trial

Chronic utilization of bio-incompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution has been implicated as a cause of progressive loss of peritoneal permeability and recurrent fluid overload in PD patients. Previous studies show that PD solution with neutral pH and low GDP resulted in a superior profile of PD effluent mesothelial cell marker and a lower degree of systemic inflammation as compared to conventional PD solution. The investigators propose a prospective randomized control study to compare the arterial stiffness, nutrition and body fluid status between PD patients treated with conventional solution and those with neutral pH low GDP solution. The investigators plan to study 100 new PD patients. They will be randomized to be treated with neutral pH low GDP solution or conventional solution. All patients will be followed for 52 weeks. In addition to routine clinical measurements, the investigators will measure their body water composition by bioimpedance spectroscopic method, arterial pulse wave velocity by pressure transduction method, as well as radiographic parameters of intravascular volume status, based on the routine chest radiograph. The study would help to define the clinical benefit of biocompatible PD solution.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

(see above)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sha Tin, Hong Kong
        • Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • new adult continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, both diabetic and non-diabetic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unlikely to survive, planned to have elective living-related kidney transplant, or transfer to other renal center within 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Balance group
peritoneal dialysis with neutral peritoneal dialysis solution with minimal glucose-degradation-product
2-L exchange; three times a day
Other Names:
  • Stay-Safe Balance system
Active Comparator: Control group
conventional PD solution
2-L exchange; three times a day
Other Names:
  • Stay-Safe, Fresenius

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
body composition
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
arterial pulse wave velocity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
nutritional and adequacy indices
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
peritoneal transport characteristics
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
residual renal function
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
peritonitis-free survival, actuarial and technique survival
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
hospitalization
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cheuk Chun Szeto, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Study Director: Philip KT Li, MD, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Balance BCM

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease

Clinical Trials on double-chamber bag Stay-Safe Balance system

Subscribe