Sickle Cell Disease Conditioning for Bone Marrow Transplant

July 24, 2017 updated by: John Horan, Emory University

Toward a Less Toxic Yet Highly Effective Conditioning Regimen in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children and Adolescents With Severe Sickle Cell Disease: A Pilot Study

Most bone marrow transplants for children with sickle cell disease are performed using high doses of two chemotherapy agents: busulfan and cyclophosphamide for the pre-transplant conditioning. This approach produces cure in most cases (approximately 95%). It, however, has serious side effects, including seizures and infertility. The primary goal of this study is to determine how much we can lower the dosages of busulfan and cyclophosphamide by incorporating fludarabine, a safer chemotherapy agent, into conditioning. The secondary goal is to develop a better understanding of how bone marrow transplants cause neurologic problems like seizures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Many children with sickle cell disease are severely affected by acute complications, especially stroke, recurrent and debilitating pain, or recurrent acute chest syndrome. As they become adolescents and young adults, patients with sickle cell disease often develop chronic problems, including renal disease, chronic lung disease and pulmonary hypertension. For children who have an HLA matched related donor, a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), using bone marrow or cord blood is an effective cure; using the standard approach, which relies on high doses of busulfan (BU) and cyclophosphamide (CY) as well as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) for pre-transplant conditioning, the probability of event free survival is now approximately 95%. The standard approach, however, is frequently complicated by acute and often severe neurological events, such as seizure and encephalopathy, as well as hypogonadism. Circumstantial evidence suggests that sickle cell patients are predisposed to transplant related neurological toxicities by disease related cerebrovascular injury, and that the transplant process aggravates this injury, causing cerebral ischemia and, in turn, neurological toxicity. The high dose chemotherapy, which has been shown to induce endothelial injury, appears to be an important contributing factor. The role of high dose chemotherapy in transplant related neurotoxicity needs to be more firmly established. The role of high dose alkylating agents in gonadal injury has been well established. Fludarabine, a non-vasculopathic, non-gonadotoxic agent, amplifies the engraftment promoting effects of Cy; in an effort to lessen the incidence of transplant related neurotoxicity and gonadotoxicity, we will conduct a pilot study in which fludarabine is added to BuCyATG for conditioning, and the dose of Bu and Cy are reduced using a stepwise de-escalation schema. This study will serve as a forerunner to larger trial designed to test the safety and efficacy of a reduced toxicity BuFluCyATG regimen. Central Hypothesis: A safer approach to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be developed for children with sickle cell disease without compromising efficacy. Specific Aims: 1) To begin to develop a reduced dose busulfan and cyclophosphamide based conditioning regimen for children with sickle cell disease that still achieves sustained engraftment at least 90% of the time, by conducting a pilot trial, in which the standard busulfan, cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin conditioning regimen is modified by adding fludarabine, a non-vasculopathic and non-gonadotoxic, yet highly immunosuppressive agent, in order to determine the feasibility of reducing the total dose of cyclophosphamide from its present standard of 200 mg/kg to 90 mg/kg and the busulfan from its present standard of 12.8 mg/kg (IV) to 6.4 mg/kg, using a four step dose de-escalation schema.. 2) a) To begin to assess the vascular, and more specifically, the cerebrovascular effects of pre-transplant, high-dose busulfan and cyclophosphamide in children with sickle cell disease by obtaining preliminary estimates of longitudinal changes in the blood levels biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation (endothelin-1, von Willebrand factor antigen, C-reactive protein, Il-8 thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes) and in the changes in two MRI biomarkers-cortical thickness measurement and diffusion tensor imaging.. b) To begin to assess the long-term effects of replacing sickle erythrocytes with normal erythrocytes (by HSCT) on the vasculature and cerebrovasculature, using the same tests. These estimates will help us to calculate a sample size and refine our testing for the second study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
        • University of Alabama-Birmingham
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, United States
        • Children's National Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33701
        • All Children's Research Institute Inc.
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Tulane University
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Wayne State University
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States
        • University of Mississippi Medical Center
    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, United States
        • Montefiore Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27516
        • University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
        • University of Texas Southwestern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Up to and including the age of 18 years at time of admission for transplant
  2. Hemoglobin SS, or hemoglobin S0 thalassemia
  3. HLA-identical sibling donor (any age) available without HgbSS, SC or S0 thalassemia. As an alternative, HLA identical sibling umbilical cord blood can be used as long as the unit has a pre-cryopreservation TNC dose of greater than 5.0 x 107 TNC/kg recipient weight.
  4. Clinically severe SCD, defined by one of the following:

    1. Previous clinical stroke, as evidenced by a neurological deficit lasting longer than 24 hours, which is accompanied by radiographic evidence of ischemic brain injury and cerebral vasculopathy.
    2. Asymptomatic cerebrovascular disease, as evidenced by one the following:

    (i)Progressive silent cerebral infarction, as evidenced by serial MRI scans that demonstrate the development of a succession of lesions (at least two temporally discreet lesions, each measuring at least 3 mm in greatest dimension on the most recent scan) or the enlargement of a single lesion, initially measuring at least 3 mm). Lesions must be visible on T2-weighted MRI sequences.

    (ii) Cerebral arteriopathy, as evidenced by abnormal TCD testing (confirmed elevated velocities in any single vessel of TAMMV > 200 cm/sec for non-imaging TCD or TAMX > 185 cm/sec for imaging TCD) or by significant vasculopathy on MRA (greater than 50% stenosis of > 2 arterial segments or complete occlusion of any single arterial segment).

    (c) Frequent (≥ 3 per year for preceding 2 years) painful vaso-occlusive episodes (defined as episode lasting ≥ 4 hours and requiring hospitalization or outpatient treatment with parenteral opioids). If patient is on hydroxyurea and its use has been associated with a decrease in the frequency of episodes, the frequency should be gauged from the 2 years prior to the start of this drug.

    (d) Recurrent (≥ 3 in lifetime) acute chest syndrome events that have necessitated erythrocyte transfusion therapy.

    (e) Any combination of ≥ 3 acute chest syndrome episodes and vaso-occlusive pain episodes (defined as above) yearly for 3 years. If patient is on hydroxyurea and its use has been associated with a decrease in the frequency of episodes, the frequency should be gauged from the 3 years prior to the start of this drug.

  5. Must have been evaluated and adequately counseled regarding treatment options for severe sickle cell disease by a pediatric hematologist.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Biopsy proven chronic active hepatitis, portal fibrosis (greater than score I), or cirrhosis, or serologic evidence of active hepatitis.
  2. SCD chronic lung disease stage III (see appendix 1).
  3. Severe renal dysfunction defined as < 50% of predicted normal GFR for age.
  4. Severe cardiac dysfunction defined as shortening fraction < 25%.
  5. Severe residual neurologic impairment other than hemiplegia alone, defined as full-scale IQ 70, quadriplegia or paraplegia, inability to ambulate, inability to communicate without assistive device, or any impairment resulting in decline of Lansky performance score to < 70%.
  6. CNS event occurring within 6 months prior to transplant.
  7. Karnofsky or Lansky functional performance score < 70%.
  8. Confirmed HIV seropositivity.
  9. Patient with unspecified chronic toxicity serious enough to detrimentally affect the patient's capacity to tolerate bone marrow transplantation.
  10. Patient or patient's guardian(s) unable to understand the nature and risks inherent in the BMT process.
  11. History of lack of compliance with medical care that would jeopardize transplant course.
  12. Donor who for psychological, physiologic, or medical reasons is unable to tolerate a bone marrow harvest or receive general anesthesia.
  13. Donor is HIV infected.
  14. Donor is pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose de-escalation
Conduct a pilot trial using a transplant protocol, in which the standard busulfan, cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin conditioning regimen is modified by adding fludarabine, a highly immunosuppressive agent, in order to determine the feasibility of reducing the total dose of cyclophosphamide from its present standard of 200 mg/kg to 90 mg/kg and of busulfan from its present standard of 12.8 mg/kg (IV) to 6.4 mg/kg, using a four step dose de-escalation schema.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Modify the standard dose of busulfan, cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin conditioning regimen by adding fludarabine in order to determine the feasibility of reducing the total dose of cyclophosphamide from its present standard of 200 mg/kg.
Time Frame: 1 year after last patient enrolled
1 year after last patient enrolled

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To gain insight into the processes that give rise to neurologic problems following bone marrow transplantation and to develop surrogate outcomes.
Time Frame: 1 year after last patient enrolled
1 year after last patient enrolled

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Horan, MD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 28, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on fludarabine

3
Subscribe