The Value of Traction in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy

November 14, 2014 updated by: Shauna Bruun, Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

The Value of Mechanical Traction in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of adding mechanical traction to standard physical therapy treatments for patients with neck and arm pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cervical traction is an intervention frequently recommended for the treatment of patients with neck pain. Systematic reviews have not endorsed the use of mechanical traction for patients with neck pain, however these reviews note the poor methodological quality of available research. Trials that have been performed have examined heterogeneous samples of patients with neck pain. It may be that cervical traction has not shown to be effective because only a specific subgroup may benefit from it. Most experts believe that traction is most beneficial for individuals with neck pain extending into the upper extremity who have signs of nerve root compression. Randomized clinical trials examining the effectiveness of traction for patients with these specific characteristics have not been performed. Preliminary studies support the hypothesis that there exists a specific subgroup of patients with neck pain likely to benefit from traction

The current study will address 3 important questions:

  1. Will the existence of a more specific subgroup of patients who benefit from traction along with a standard exercise program be validated in a second sample of patients?
  2. Is cervical traction a critical component of the treatment necessary to maximize outcomes for patients in this subgroup?
  3. Do two commonly used traction protocols differ in their effectiveness for patients in this subgroup? (Specifically, we study will compare supine mechanical traction to over-the-door traction.)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Lackland AFB, Texas, United States, 78235
        • Wilford Hall Medical Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84119
        • Intermountain Healthcare, Rehab Agency

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Primary complaint of neck pain with symptoms (pain and/or numbness) extending distal to the acromioclavicular joint or caudal to the superior border of the scapula (may be unilateral or bilateral).
  2. Age between 18-70 years old
  3. Neck Disability Score score >10 points

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Red flags indicative of a serious or non-musculoskeletal condition (i.e. tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, RA, osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use, etc.)
  2. Diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis based on CT or MRI imaging
  3. Evidence of cervical myelopathy or central nervous system involvement, (e.g., hyperreflexia, intrinsic muscle wasting of the hands, unsteadiness during gait, nystagmus, loss of visual acuity, impaired sensation of the face, altered taste, presence of pathologic reflexes (i.e. positive Hoffman's or Babinski reflex).
  4. Prior surgery to the neck or thoracic spine
  5. Inability to comply with treatment and follow-up schedule

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard exercise
Subjects will be instructed in neck and postural exercises.
Mechanical cervical traction will be applied at a moderate force and adjusted based on symptom relief. In addition, subjects will be trained in cervical and postural exercises.
Other Names:
  • Saunders 3D Active Trac
Subjects will be instructed in use of an over-the-door traction unit utilizing weights up to 20 pounds in sitting. In addition, subjects will be trained in neck and postural exercises.
Subjects will be instructed in neck and postural exercises.
Experimental: Over-door traction and exercise.
Subjects will receive traction utilizing an over-the-door traction unit in addition to neck and postural exercises.
Mechanical cervical traction will be applied at a moderate force and adjusted based on symptom relief. In addition, subjects will be trained in cervical and postural exercises.
Other Names:
  • Saunders 3D Active Trac
Subjects will be instructed in use of an over-the-door traction unit utilizing weights up to 20 pounds in sitting. In addition, subjects will be trained in neck and postural exercises.
Subjects will be instructed in neck and postural exercises.
Experimental: Mechanical traction and exercise
Mechanical cervical traction will be utilized in addition to neck and postural exercises.
Mechanical cervical traction will be applied at a moderate force and adjusted based on symptom relief. In addition, subjects will be trained in cervical and postural exercises.
Other Names:
  • Saunders 3D Active Trac
Subjects will be instructed in use of an over-the-door traction unit utilizing weights up to 20 pounds in sitting. In addition, subjects will be trained in neck and postural exercises.
Subjects will be instructed in neck and postural exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Neck Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months, 1year
Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months, 1year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julie Fritz, IHC Health Services, Inc., Dba: TOSH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 17, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Diseases

Clinical Trials on Physical therapy rehabilitation

Subscribe