The Intermittent Pneumoperitoneum Scheme of Work Breaks in Complex Laparoscopic Surgery (IPP)

November 5, 2009 updated by: Hannover Medical School

Prospective Study on the Effects of the Intermittent Pneumoperitoneum (IPP) Work Break Scheme on Surgeons and Patients.

Many people spanning from air traffic controllers to simple production line workers share regular compulsive breaks to revert fatigue whilst they work. This is uncommon for medical operators - a macho image is still as prevalent in real life as it is in countless TV series.

We report on the first clinical trial on regular intraoperative breaks. For one time we turned our scientific curiosity to ourselves. This included the intraoperative collection of body fluids and required transparency which was not easy to obtain. It was rewarded with striking results: Regular intraoperative breaks lowered significantly the operators stress hormone levels, improved error-performance testing results and musculoskeletal fatigue scores. Subjectively the breaks enhanced the practitioners satisfaction.

Surprisingly the operator's breaks were not at the cost of the patient: because the did not prolong the overall operation time at all and - in our setting- they significantly increased of cardiac output and urine production.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Abstract

Background: Work breaks at close intervals are common in fields with high workload but not yet for medical operators. We evaluated the effects of intraoperative breaks (five minutes every half hour) on the surgeon and on the patient.

Methods: Operations were randomized to either a scheme with intraoperative breaks and release of the pneumoperitoneum (intermittent pneumoperitoneum = IPP) or a conventional conduct (CPP). Stress hormones and α-amylase were determined in the surgeon's saliva pre-, intra- and postoperatively. Mental performance and error scores, musculoskeletal strain and continuous ECG were secondary endpoints. The children's physiology was monitored.

Findings:

Regular intraoperative breaks did not prolong the operation. The surgeon's cortisol levels during the operation were reduced. There were fewer intraoperative events in the IPP vs. the CPP group. The pre- to postoperative increase in the error rates of the bp-concentration test was reduced in the IPP group. The relevant locomotive strain-scores were reduced by IPP.

There was no negative impact on the patient. Interpretation: Our data support the idea that work breaks during complex laparoscopic surgery can reduce psychological stress and preserve performance with at least similar patient outcome compared to the traditional work scheme.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lower Saxony
      • Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany, 30625
        • Hannover Medical School, Pediatric Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 weeks to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • complex laparoscopic operations in children (duration > 100 minutes)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age under 4 weeks
  • operations which had to be performed in an open surgery mode

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: breaks during laparoscopic surgery
Intraoperative Breaks were instituted in the intervention group. The other group operated conventionally without breaks
Institution of intraoperative breaks for the surgeon with release of pneumoperitoneum for patient
Other Names:
  • break schemes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
hormonal stress response of the operating surgeon: cortisol, amylase, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
continuous ECG, concentration and performance (bp-test ), Self ratings of own satisfaction, performance, musculoskeletal system (MSS) and ophthalmologic strain
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Benno M Ure, PhD, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2009

Last Verified

November 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IPP 67
  • 4165; 3-2-2006 (Other Identifier: Ethical Commission Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anuria

Clinical Trials on IPP

Subscribe