The Effect of a New Emulsion in Dry Eye Patients on Tear Layer Aberrometry, Contrast Sensitivity, and Reading Ability

The Effect of a New Emulsion in Dry Eye Patients on Tear Layer Aberrometry, Contrast Sensitivity, and Reading Ability.

The purpose of this study is to investigate how the addition of a new emulsion artificial tear to the tear layer of dry eye and normal patients affects aberrometry, contrast sensitivity, and reading ability over time. Previous studies have indicated that daily use of artificial tears over a two week period decreases the short term affect of drop application on aberrometry and contrast sensitivity measurements. The present study will examine the effects of 4 weeks of artificial tear use to determine when the responses stabilize.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dry eye patients experience symptoms such as; irritation, dryness, a scratchy sensation, and blur. These symptoms are the result of an insufficient tear layer. Blur can occur in dry eye patients because of an irregular tear film surface.

Artificial tears are applied to the eye to treat a variety of eye conditions. These conditions typically are associated with dry eyes and include tear film deficiency due to ocular or systemic disease, lid resurfacing problems, and contact lens wear. The artificial tears are used to alleviate the dry eye symptoms.

Dry eye is a frequently encountered ocular condition. Recent studies estimate that 7.8% of women and 4.8% of men over the age of 50 suffer from dry eye. The administration of an artificial tear to the eye can disrupt the tear layer and this disruption could then result in a change in contrast sensitivity for a few moments. Aberrometry is a technique that is able to monitor tear layer disruption and its results may correlate with contrast sensitivity changes.

Tear layer disruption results in a decrease in the modulation transfer function (MTF) for the eye. Since the tear layer is the first refracting surface of the eye, its disruption can also result in a change in contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and aberrometry. Previous work has demonstrated that higher order aberrations increase 1.44 fold after the tear film breaks up in normal subjects. Dry eye subjects demonstrate a significant increase in higher order aberrations (i.e., total S3+4+5, spherical-like S4, and coma-like S3+5) when compared to normal subjects. This has been interpreted to be the result of increased tear irregularities in the dry eye subjects.

When an artificial tear (i.e., Vismed) was applied to the tear layer of dry eye subjects, the optical aberrations decreased. This previous study only examined the short term affect (less than 10 minutes) of a single administration of an artificial tear. In this study, we propose to examine the short and long term effects of a new emulsion on contrast sensitivity, optical aberrations, and reading ability after administration into the tear layer of normal and dry eye subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Fullerton, California, United States, 92831
        • Southern California College of Optometry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mild, moderate, or severe symptoms of dry eye

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled systemic disease
  • contact lens wear
  • participation in another clinical trial
  • best corrected visual acuity poorer than 20/25

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Optive, Soothe, New Emulsion
Subjects do not use artificial tears for one week followed by 1 month using Optive two times per day. One week washout then 1 month Soothe two times per day followed by one week washout and one month New Emulsion 2 times per day.
One week without artificial tear use followed by Optive use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by Soothe use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by the New Emulsion use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month.
Experimental: Soothe, New Emulsion, Optive
Subjects do not use artificial tears for one week followed by 1 month using Soothe two times per day. One week washout then 1 month New Emulsion two times per day followed by one week washout and one month Optive 2 times per day.
One week without artificial tear use followed by Soothe use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by New Emulsion use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by the Optive use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month.
Experimental: New Emulsion, Optive, Soothe
Subjects do not use artificial tears for one week followed by 1 month using New Emulsion two times per day. One week washout then 1 month Optive two times per day followed by one week washout and one month Soothe 2 times per day.
One week without artificial tear use followed by New Emulsion use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by Optive use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by the Soothe use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Change in contrast sensitivity with administration of the artificial tear. During a visit, contrast sensitivity is initially monitored for several minutes (i.e., pre-artificial tear application contrast sensitivity) and the artificial tear is then applied and the contrast sensitivity is continually measured for several more minutes (post-artificial tear application contrast sensitivity). The administration of the artificial tear decreases contrast sensitivity for approximately a minute. The data reported in the table is the change in contrast sensitivity from pre-artificial tear administration to the peak loss in contrast sensitivity after the artificial tear administration (negative values). This procedure is carried out before the subjects use artificial tears on a daily basis (i.e., baseline data) and for several weeks after using artificial tears on a daily basis (i.e., weeks 1, 2, and 4) to determine if there is an adaptation to the artificial tear.
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
dry eye questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, week 1, week 2, week 4
baseline, week 1, week 2, week 4
slit lamp exam
Time Frame: baseline, week 4
baseline, week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William H. Ridder, OD, PhD, Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2009

First Posted (Estimated)

November 13, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All data is available upon request.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Optive, Soothe, New Emulsion

Subscribe