Study of the Impact of Parental Note Taking on the Effectiveness of Anticipatory Guidance

September 20, 2012 updated by: Boston Medical Center

A Randomized Controlled Trial of The Impact of Parental Note Taking on the Effectiveness of Anticipatory Guidance: the Suzuki Music Model Applied to Urban Pediatrics

The delivery of anticipatory guidance is an essential component of pediatric practice. Given the large amount of information to be shared during each encounter and the limited time available, there is a need for an effective and efficient means of communication between health care providers and families. The investigators hypothesize that more active parental participation in the form of note taking during the delivery of anticipatory guidance will lead to increased knowledge, higher levels of satisfaction with the encounter, and increased adoption of recommended parenting practices.

In this study, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial of the impact of note taking during the delivery of newborn anticipatory guidance on maternal practices related to newborn care. The investigators plan to compare a control group of mothers receiving standard of care anticipatory guidance with an intervention group of mothers who are encouraged to take written notes while receiving the anticipatory guidance. The primary outcome of interest is maternal practice related to infant sleep position, and the secondary outcomes of interest are maternal practice related to breastfeeding initiation and car seat use. The investigators also plan to evaluate the impact of note taking on mothers' knowledge of recommended practices related to newborn care and on mothers' satisfaction with the guidance received.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The importance of communicating effectively with families and children is not unique to medicine. In the field of child music education, research has shown that effective parental involvement is linked to musical achievement [1]. The Suzuki method of music education in particular emphasizes this involvement and regards an effective teacher-child-parent relationship as fundamental to learning [2]. Parental engagement both during the music lesion and at home is key, and parents are routinely encouraged to take notes during the lesson so they can accurately recall the instruction for practice at home [1]. The Suzuki method is based on the idea that this model of education can be used with any family in any environment [3]. We are interested to learn whether a similar approach can be applied to pediatric anticipatory guidance in an urban population.

Note taking has been shown to improve both memory and comprehension in a number of settings. In a study of memory aids, participants taking notes exhibited higher levels of accurate recall of information than participants using other techniques [4]. Another study demonstrated that participants who took notes and then had the notes to review had improved recall of information when compared to participants who were given written information to study but did not take notes themselves [5]. Even doodling has been shown to lead to improved memory and to aid with concentration [6]. Interestingly, patient or family note taking for retention of medical information has not been extensively studied.

A number of studies have been done to look at interventions to improve both the delivery of health information and the retention of the information provided. Randomized controlled trials have looked at the impact of specific training programs for providers [7] and at practice-wide changes in office systems [8], and have shown improvements in the amount and quality of guidance provided. A study looking at the impact of physician advice on behavior change found that patients who had received counseling by their physician prior to receiving related written materials had better recall of information and were more likely to share the materials with others when compared to patients who only received the written material with no counseling [9]. A study on information recall of instructions given in the emergency department for otitis media care showed that parents retained more information at one and three days after the encounter when they received either standardized verbal or written instructions, as opposed to the usual verbal instructions [10].

The effective delivery of health information plays a central role in pediatric primary care. In 1990, the Federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau, along with the American Academy of Pediatrics, launched Bright Futures, a set of health supervision guidelines for pediatric patients aged birth to 21 [11]. The guidelines, which provide a framework for well-patient care, emphasize a partnership between the healthcare team, the family, and the child and highlight a number of recommended topics to be covered at routine visits [12]. This is a standard curriculum for primary care in many pediatric residencies, including the Boston Combined Residency Program.

For many families, the first interaction with a healthcare provider for their child occurs during the newborn evaluation prior to discharge from the hospital. The newborn anticipatory guidance recommended by Bright Futures is divided into the five categories of family readiness, infant behaviors, feeding, safety, and routine newborn care [12]. Included in these topics are recommendations for counseling on prone sleeping position, or "back to sleep," breast feeding support, and car seat use, all of which have been shown to improve infant health and safety [13,14,15]. Despite the recommendations for newborn anticipatory guidance, a national survey of parents with young children showed that 38% of parents reported never having discussed newborn care with a healthcare provider [16]. The authors of the study comment that it is difficult to know whether a portion of these families received information but were unable to remember it at the time of the survey. In the same study, a perceived lack of information was correlated with decreased satisfaction with care. The parents who reported discussing fewer anticipatory guidance topics gave their providers lower overall ratings.

A survey of sleep position of infants seen at an urban primary care center in Washington DC showed that 34.1% of infants were sleeping in the recommended supine position [17]. A subsequent study of sleep position reported by parents of black infants at a WIC clinic in Washington DC showed that 57.7% of the infants were sleeping in the supine position [13]. While there are many factors that impact parental behaviors around sleep position, the most common reasons given for supine sleeping position in this study were concern for SIDS and advice from a health care professional. These findings indicate that improved delivery of anticipatory guidance may play a role in increasing the proportion of infants sleeping on their backs.

At Boston Medical Center (BMC), a group of three nurse practitioners split full-time coverage of the newborn nursery and are responsible for doing a great deal of the newborn teaching with parents. Prior to discharge from the hospital, each infant is evaluated and teaching on newborn care is done using both verbal instruction and written handouts. This teaching, which is based on the Bright Futures recommendations, covers topics including feeding, diaper care, bathing, dressing, umbilical cord care, circumcision care, safety, sleeping, and crying. The providers also review warning signs that may indicate that an infant is sick. At the time this teaching is done, each mother is given a large envelope containing the discharge documents. On the outside of the envelope is a section designated for taking notes, although this is not currently used by the providers or parents.

In our study, a randomized controlled trial, we will draw on the techniques promoted by the Suzuki method of music education to see if the principles of increased parental involvement and parental note taking can improve information retention and impact behavior change. We hypothesize that more active parental participation in the form of note taking during the delivery of anticipatory guidance will lead to increased knowledge, higher levels of satisfaction with the encounter, and increased adoption of recommended parenting practices. Our specific aims are as follows:

Specific Aim 1: To evaluate the impact of note taking during the delivery of newborn anticipatory guidance on maternal behavior. The primary outcome of interest is maternal practice related to infant sleep position, and the secondary outcomes of interest are maternal practice related to breastfeeding initiation and car seat use.

Specific Aim 2: To evaluate the impact of note taking on mothers' knowledge of recommended practices related to newborn care.

Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the impact of note taking during health information delivery on mothers' satisfaction with the guidance received.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • newborn gestational age greater than 35 weeks
  • maternal spoken fluency in either English or Spanish
  • a working telephone in the home.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • either the newborn or the mother has a medical condition requiring hospitalization for longer than 4 days after a cesarean section or 2 days after a vaginal delivery
  • mother not expected to retain custody of the infant at the time of discharge

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual care
Mothers in the control group will receive the nursing discharge newborn information from the nurse practitioner [sometimes via a Spanish interpreter, if required] according to current standard of care, which includes verbal information and written handouts.
EXPERIMENTAL: Note taking
The mothers in the intervention group will be given a pen and encouraged to take written notes in the notes section of the discharge envelope using their language of preference when receiving the standard newborn information.
The mothers in the intervention group will be given a pen and encouraged to take written notes in the notes section of a discharge envelope using their language of preference when receiving standard newborn discharge information.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Primary Outcome of Interest is Maternal Practice Related to Supine Infant Sleep Position.
Time Frame: two days after discharge
This measure assesses maternal report of placing the infant on the back to sleep (supine sleep position) as opposed to putting the infant on its side or stomach.
two days after discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maternal Practice Related to Breastfeeding Initiation
Time Frame: two days after discharge
This measure assesses maternal report of breastfeeding. The number analyzed is the number who reported any breastfeeding.
two days after discharge
Maternal Practice Related to Correct Car Seat Use
Time Frame: two days after discharge
Correct car seat use by all subjects who use cars was defined as placing the car seat in the back seat facing backwards and using the car seat every time the infant travels by car. The number reported is the number who report using the car seat correctly.
two days after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: C. Jason Wang, MD, Boston Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 16, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sudden Infant Death

Clinical Trials on Note taking

3
Subscribe