Prophylactic Administration of Natural Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery in Twin Pregnancies

December 3, 2014 updated by: Maria de Lourdes Brizot, University of Sao Paulo

Prophylactic Administration of Natural Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Twin pregnancies are at substantial increased risk of preterm delivery. Prophylactic administration of progesterone in singleton pregnancies at risk of preterm delivery has been shown to be effective in reducing the rate of such complication. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of prophylactic administration of natural progesterone in twin pregnancies on the rate of preterm births.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In a double-blind, placebo controlled study performed in our Institution, Fonseca et al., investigated the use of micronized natural progesterone, crafted in vaginal capsules of 100mg, for the prevention of preterm delivery. The study involved 142 singleton pregnancies at high risk for premature birth (previous premature birth, cerclage and uterine malformation). The progesterone was introduced from 24 weeks to 34 weeks gestation. The authors observed a significant reduction of premature birth before 37 weeks (28,1% within the placebo group versus 13,8% within the treated group) and below 34 weeks (18,6% within the placebo group versus 2,8% within the treated group). Also, it was observed a reduction in the frequency of the uterine contractions in the progesterone group.

In the only study performed specifically among twin pregnancies, Anna Lisa et al. in 1980, administrated 250mg of 17αOH-PC or placebo (still oil) weekly, in 70 pregnant women with twin pregnancies, beginning before 28 weeks and continuing up to 37 weeks gestation. Seric levels of progesterone, estradiol, estriol, testosterone, and placental lactogenic hormone were also measured weekly. The differences among the achieved results within both groups, according the average in pregnancy duration (36,9 within the treated group, versus 37,3 within the placebo group), the average birthweight and the perimortality rate were not significantly different, as well as the levels of progesterone, estriol, estradiol, testosterone and placental lactogenic hormone. Nevertheless, this study was criticized for starting the use of progesterone at a late stage of pregnancy, in a considerable number of cases.

These studies suggest that in singleton pregnancies with a previous history of preterm birth progesterone treatment may prevent the patients from having subsequent premature births. Nonetheless, the results of these series must not be generalized to all pregnancies at high risk. Additional studies to evaluate the use of progesterone ovules in multiple pregnancies are necessary, as these pregnancies are increasing due to the advanced maternal age at the conception time and also due to the widespread use of assisted reproductive techniques.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

390

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05403000
        • Hospital das Clinicas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Naturally conceived diamniotic twin pregnancies.
  • Absence of major fetal abnormalities (such as neural tube defects, abdominal wall defects, cardiac defects, hydrocephalus, malformations that course with polyhydramnios) at the anomaly scan.
  • Gestational age between 18 - 21+6weeks at the moment of randomization.
  • Patients that are not allergic to the progesterone capsule excipients (arachis oil, soy and lecithin).
  • Patients who do not use other medicines that can alter the progesterone effects, such as: barbituric, carbamazepine, hydantoin, rifampicin, betablockers, teofiline or ciclosporin.
  • Porphyria, otoscleroses, malignant disease or severe depressive state.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Premature rupture of membranes diagnosed at the moment of recruitment.
  • Subsequent diagnosis of major fetal abnormalities.
  • Twin to twin transfusion syndrome diagnosed during the course of the pregnancy.
  • Presence of ovular infection.
  • Death of one or both fetuses in any time of the pregnancy.
  • Giving up or discontinuing the use of the medication.
  • Elective or iatrogenic premature birth (before 34 weeks).
  • Present or past history of thromboembolic disease
  • Uterine malformation
  • Known or suspected breast or genitals malignancy tumor
  • Plan to move to another city during pregnancy
  • Placenta Previa

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo
group taking placebo
placebo
Active Comparator: study group
group taking progesterone
ovules, 200mg per vagina, once a day from 18 weeks
Other Names:
  • utrogestan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
gestational age at delivery
Time Frame: once at the end of study
once at the end of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Brizot, PhD, Department of Obstetrics, São Paulo University Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 14, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preterm Delivery

Clinical Trials on placebo

Subscribe