Endoscopic Therapy for Bleeding Marginal Ulcers After Gastric Bypass (BleedingMU)

December 28, 2009 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Endoscopic Therapy for Actively Bleeding Marginal Ulcers: Our Experience After 7,020 Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgeries

The objective of this study is to identify the incidence rate; describe the risk factors, clinical presentation, and endoscopic treatment; assess the morbidity, mortality, and overall performance of the management of patients with actively bleeding marginal ulcers after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Marginal ulceration "MU", which presents as an ulcer at the margins of the gastrojejunostomy on the jejunal side, is a common late complication after RYGB. Its incidence after RYGB ranges from as low as 0.6 to as high as 16%. In our hands with the laparoscopic hand-sewn technique for the GJ, the incidence is 1.4%. The presence of specific technical factors - staple-line dehiscence or gastro-gastric fistula, enlarged pouch, foreign material and local ischemia - and environmental factors - tobacco, NSAID´s, alcohol consumption, and H pylori infection among others - have been associated with marginal ulceration however the exact etiopathogenesis has not been completely elucidated.

Similar to peptic ulcer disease (PUD), most marginal ulcers respond to medical therapy, specifically sucralfate and acid-lowering medication. In contrast, complicated marginal ulcers - perforation, bleeding, or chronicity (obstruction, penetration, and intractability)- warrants operative intervention.

Early presentation of hemorrhage after RYGB is mostly related to staple-line failure and may result in either GI or intraabdominal hemorrhage. When indicated, operative interventions consist of either endoscopic therapy, re-operation, or both. In contrast, late presentation of gastrointestinal hemorrhage after RYGB is mostly secondary to a bleeding marginal ulcer however complicated peptic ulcer disease can present in the excluded stomach and duodenum as well.

Most literature available for the management of GI hemorrhage after RYGB is for the early presentation of hemorrhage secondary to staple-line failure. Hence, options for endoscopic hemostatic therapy described in this scenario are I) injection therapy, II) coagulation therapy, III) endoscopic clipping, and IV) a combined modality (for example injection & coagulation or injection and clipping).

The feasibility, reliability, reproducibility, efficacy, validity and safety of the endoscopic hemostatic therapy for acutely bleeding peptic ulcers has been well documented. Multiple risk-stratification tools for upper-GI hemorrhage have also been developed such as the Blatchford, clinical and complete Rockall scores, and the Forrest classification. Moreover, pre and post endoscopic schemes of PPI´s therapy in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers is effective and cost-saving. However, All of them have not been validated in the obese population status post RYGB complicated with a bleeding marginal ulcer.

Summarizing, there is scant information about the management of late complications after gastric bypass especially after the widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach and the modern anatomical construct of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass surgery. We formally analyze the management efficacy of patients with actively bleeding marginal ulcers after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93701
        • UCSF Fresno Center for Medical Education and Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with actively bleeding marginal ulcers after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients status post laparoscopic RYGB surgery with active gastrointestinal hemorrhage secondary to marginal ulcer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bleeding marginal ulcers after other bariatric procedures
  • staple-line bleeding after RYGB
  • iron-deficiency anemia (chronic) secondary to non-actively bleeding marginal ulcer after RYGB
  • other sources of GI bleeding different from marginal ulcer such as from staple-lines, complicated PUD, and other surgical and medical causes of GI hemorrhage
  • missing records and/or unreachable patients with scant information for analysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Bleeding marginal ulcer after RYGB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Morbidity and mortality, overall
Time Frame: throughout follow-up
throughout follow-up
re-bleeding, gastrointestinal hemorrhage secondary to marginal ulceration
Time Frame: throughout follow-up
throughout follow-up
marginal ulcer recurrence
Time Frame: at last follow-up
at last follow-up
Symptom resolution, marginal ulcer
Time Frame: at last follow-up
at last follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
consumption of blood products
Time Frame: during bleeding-related hospitalization
during bleeding-related hospitalization
weight loss expressed as Body Mass Index and Percentage excess weight loss
Time Frame: at the lowest point and yearly intervals
at the lowest point and yearly intervals

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Francisco M Tercero, MD, Research Associate, University of California San Francisco
  • Principal Investigator: Kelvin D Higa, MD, Professor of Surgery, University of California San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 29, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2009

Last Verified

December 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CMC IRB No. 2008081
  • U1111-1112-9849 (Other Identifier: World Health Organization, Universal Trial Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bleeding Marginal Ulcer

Subscribe