Efficacy of L-Ornithine L-Aspartate in Acute Hepatic Encephalopathy.

May 6, 2021 updated by: Dr. Claudia Isabel Blanco Vela, Centro Regional para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Digestivas

The Infusion of L-Ornithine L-aspart is as Effective as Nonabsorbable Disaccharides in the Management of Acute Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Hepatic encephalopathy is caused by the effects on the brain of substances that under normal circumstances are efficiently metabolized in the liver. The hyperammonemia is the main factor responsible for the development of hepatic encephalopathy. In patients with cirrhosis, the reduction in hepatocellular function and generation of portosystemic shunts contribute to increase serum ammonium. The current therapeutic approaches, are aimed at reducing blood ammonium levels.

Administration of the non-absorbable disaccharides, have become standard treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.There are no adequate clinical trials comparing the efficacy of L-Ornithine-L-Aspartate (LOLA) infusion against lactose enemas in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The main impact of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis is not related to costs, but its association with decreased survival and quality of life and should therefore clearly established the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions used in this disorder.

At the end of the nineteenth century to the ammonium was identified as the main agent responsible for the development of the syndrome of hepatic encephalopathy. Since then, reduced nitrogen compounds from the intestine are considered the main therapeutic measure. On this conceptual base, nonabsorbable disaccharides are the first line therapy in hepatic encephalopathy.

Current knowledge indicates that other organs such as muscle, brain and kidney are involved in the generation of ammonium, which has set the pace for the development of new treatments, able to act systemically in metabolism and elimination of ammonia . L-ornithine L-aspartate (LOLA) lowers ammonium concentrations in animal and humans models with hyperammonemia. There are no adequate clinical trials comparing the efficacy of LOLA infusion against lactose enemas in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64460
        • Hospital Universitario "José Eleuterio González"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cirrhosis of any etiology, diagnosed by ultrasound,clinical and / or histologic criteria
  • Patients over 18 years and under 75
  • Patients with hepatic encephalopathy grade 3-4 according to the criteria of West Haven
  • Patients with hyperammonemia >10 µmol/l

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of neurological or psychiatric illness
  • Use of drugs affecting the central nervous system
  • Withdrawal Syndrome
  • Anorectal disease that interferes with the administration of enemas

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intravenous infusion of L- Ornithine L- Aspartate
a) 20 g L-ornithine-L-aspartate
a) Intravenous infusion of 20 g L-ornithine-L-aspartate (4 ampules of 10 mL each) in 250 mL sodium chloride solution administered daily in 4 hours for 3 consecutive days, plus the placebo b) Water enemas, 1000 mL of water and given as retention enema every 12 hours for 3 consecutive days.
Other Names:
  • LOLA
Active Comparator: Lactose enemas
b) 20% Lactose enemas
a) 20% Lactose enemas, 200 g Lactose diluted with 700 mL of water and given as retention enema every 12 hours for 3 consecutive days, plus intravenous placebo b)250 mL sodium chloride solution, infusion for 4 hours for 3 consecutive days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of at least one grade in mental state based on the West Haven Criteria
Time Frame: 72 hours
Improvement was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The mental state was scored from trivial lack of awareness to deep coma from grade 1 to grade 4.
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of at least one grade in mental state assessed by the Glasgow Coma Scale
Time Frame: 72 hours
Improvement was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The Glasgow Coma Scale assesses three aspects of responsiveness: eye-opening, motor, and verbal responses. The eye-opening was quantified from 1 to 4 points, the motor response from 1 to 6 points and the verbal response from 1 to 5 points.
72 hours
Improvement of at least one grade in mental state assessed by the Clinical Hepatic Encephalopathy Staging Scale (CHESS)
Time Frame: 72 hours
Improvement was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The CHESS scale has 9 dichotomous questions that assess mental state, intellectual function, behavior, verbal and motor response and orientation. It was quantified from 0 to 9 points.
72 hours
Improvement of asterixis grade
Time Frame: 72 hours
Improvement was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. Asterixis was graded as follows: Grade 0 = without flapping motion, Grade 1 ≤ 5 flaps per minute, Grade 2 = 6 to 10 flaps per minute, Grade 3 = 11 to 20 flaps per minute and Grade 4, continuous flap or patient in coma unable to maintain wrist dorsiflexion. Asterixis grade was evaluated at 0. 24, 48 and 72 hours.
72 hours
Improvement in electroencephalographic tracing grade
Time Frame: 72 hours
Improvement was assessed at 0 and 72 hours. EEG tracing was graduated from 0 to 4: Grade 0 = normal alpha rhythm, Grade 1 =7 to 8 cycles per second, Grade 2= 5 to 6 cycles per second, Grade 3 = 3 to 4.5 cycles per second and Grade 4 < than 3 cycles per second or delta rhythm. EEG was assessed at 0 and 72 hours.
72 hours
Improvement in serum ammonia
Time Frame: 72 hours
Ammonia determination was performed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours.
72 hours
Improvement in Number connection tests
Time Frame: 72 hours
The mental state of the patients included in the study did not allow them to perform the number connection test, therefore, they were all assigned to the worst score (Grade 4)
72 hours
Improvement in Portosystemic Encephalopathy Index.
Time Frame: 72 hours
Improvement was assessed at 0 and 72 hours. The PSE Index was calculated by multiplying the grade of mental state by a factor of 3; and the grades of asterixis, number connection tests, serum ammonia and EEG were multiplied times a factor of 1. The results were divided by the maximal possible PSE sum.
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Francisco J Bosques, MD, PhD, Centro Regional para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Digestivas
  • Principal Investigator: Claudia Isabel Blanco Vela, MD, Hospital Juarez de Mexico

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 1, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatic Encephalopathy

Clinical Trials on L-ornithine-L-aspartate

Subscribe